Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:05:38.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revisiting Judicial Empowerment in the European Union

Limits of Empowerment, Logics of Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Tommaso Pavone
Tommaso Pavone*
Affiliation:
Princeton University
*
Contact the author at [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Judicial empowerment is often cited as a driver of transnational governance, particularly in the European Union. In this view, lower national courts enthusiastically began referring cases to the European Court of Justice to acquire new powers of judicial review. Revisiting this argument, I argue that path dependent, everyday practices within domestic judiciaries stemming from insufficient training in European Union law, workload pressures, and cultural aversions to judicial review can resist Europeanization even when it would lead to empowerment. The argument is evaluated via a critical case study of judicial practice in Italy that is placed in a broader comparative context.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , Fall 2018 , pp. 303 - 331
Copyright
© 2018 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am indebted to Kim Lane Scheppele, R. Daniel Kelemen, Fernanda Nicola, William Phelan, Juan Mayoral, Jan Komárek, Fabien Terpan, Daniele Gallo, Nicola Lupo, Cristina Fasone, Pietro Faraguna, David Klein, and three anonymous reviewers for very helpful feedback provided in earlier iterations of this article. Funding for this research was generously provided by the National Science Foundation’s Law and Social Sciences Program through a Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant (no. 1628301) and by a fieldwork grant from the Mamdouha S. Bobst Center for Peace and Justice. The usual disclaimer applies, and all errors are my own.

References

Alter, Karen. 1996. “The European Court’s Political Power.” West European Politics 19 (3): 458–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen. 2000. “The European Union’s Legal System and Domestic Policy.” International Organization 54 (3): 489–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen. 2001. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen, and Laurence Helfer. 2017. Transplanting International Courts. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arksey, Hilary, and Peter Knight. 1999. Interviewing for Social Scientists. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, Antonio, and Angela Guerrieri. 2017. “The Pyrrhic Victory of Mr. Francovich and the Principle of State Liability in the Italian Context.” In EU Law Stories: Contextual and Critical Histories of European Jurisprudence, ed. Fernanda Nicola and Bill Davies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew. 2013. “Causal Mechanisms and Typological Theories in the Study of Civil Conflict.” In Transnational Dynamics of Civil War, ed. Jeffrey T. Checkel. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Jeffrey T. Checkel, eds. 2015. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey M. 2002. “Validity and Reliability Issues in Elite Interviewing.” PS: Political Science and Politics 35 (4): 679–82.Google Scholar
Bobek, Michal. 2014. “Landtová, Holubec, and the Problem of an Uncooperative Court: Implications for the Preliminary Rulings Procedure.” European Constitutional Law Review 10 (1): 54–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burley, Anne-Marie, and Walter Mattli. 1993. “Europe before the Court.” International Organization 47 (1): 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvez, Françoise. 2012. Length of Court Proceedings in the Member States of the Council of Europe Based on the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights. Report prepared for the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), Strasbourg. http://www.marinacastellaneta.it/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Rapport_2012_16_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford, Matthew Gabel, and Charles Hankla. 2008. “Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints.” American Political Science Review 102 (4): 435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford, and Lacey Murrah. 2005. “Legal Integration and Use of the Preliminary Ruling Process in the European Union.” International Organization 59 (2): 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel. 2007. The European Court and Civil Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, Lisa. 2002. Justice Contained. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coughlan, John, Jaroslav Opravil, and Wolfgang Heusel. 2011. Judicial Training in the European Union Member States. Report prepared for the Directorate General for Internal Policies of the European Parliament. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2011/453198/IPOL-JURI_ET(2011)453198(SUM01)_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
Davies, Bill. 2012. Resisting the European Court of Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyevre, Arthur. 2013. “European Integration and National Courts.” European Constitutional Law Review 9:139–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyevre, Arthur. 2017. “Domestic Judicial Defiance and the Authority of International Legal Regimes.” European Journal of Law and Economics 44 (3): 453–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyevre, Arthur, Monika Glavina, and Nicolas Lampach. 2017. “Judicial Agents and Procedural Dismissals in Heterarchical Court Systems.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3041104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyevre, Arthur, and Nicolas Lampach. 2017. “The Choice for Europe: Judicial Behaviour and Legal Integration in the European Union.” https://papers.ssrn.com/Sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2926496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Studies and Theory in Political Science.” In Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7, Political Science: Scope and Theory, ed. Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby, 79–138. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Falkner, Gerda, Oliver Trieb, and Elisabeth Holzleithner. 2008. Compliance in the Enlarged European Union: Living Rights or Dead Letters? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1975. Surveiller et punir. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead.” Law and Society Review 9 (1): 95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garoupa, Nunu, and Tom Ginsburg. 2015. Judicial Reputation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John. 2007. “Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?” Comparative Political Studies 40:231–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John, and Lee Cojocaru. 2016. “Selecting Cases for Intensive Analysis: A Diversity of Goals and Methods.” Sociological Methods and Research 45 (3): 392–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Paul S., John B. Williamson, David A. Karp, and John R. Dalphin. 2007. The Research Imagination: An Introduction to Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terrence, and Gregory Shaffer, eds. 2015. Transnational Legal Orders. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2007. Towards Juristocracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2008. “The Judicialization of Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, ed. Keith E. Whittington, R. Daniel Kelemen, and Gregory A. Caldeira. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel. 2016. “Constructing the European Judiciary.” Paper presented at the Council for European Studies conference, April, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Tommaso Pavone. 2016. “Mapping European Law.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (8): 1118–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel. 2017. “The European Court of Justice’s Evolving Relationship with National Judiciaries.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association annual meeting, August 31–September 3, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel. Forthcoming. “The Political Geography of Legal Integration.” World Politics.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Alec Stone Sweet. 2017. “Assessing The Transformation of Europe: A View from Political Science.” In The Transformation of Europe: Twenty-Five Years On, ed. Miguel Poiares Maduro and Marlene Wind. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2010. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Thirtieth anniversary expanded ed. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Kathleen Thelen. 2010. “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change.” In Explaining Institutional Change, ed. James Mahoney and Kathleen Thelen. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinsen, Dorte. 2015. An Ever More Powerful Court? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayoral, Juan, Urszula Jaremba, and Tobias Nowak. 2014. “Creating EU Law Judges.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (8): 1120–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merryman, John Henry, and Rogelio Perez-Perdomo. 2007. The Civil Law Tradition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Noy, Chaim. 2008. “Sampling Knowledge: The Hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11 (4): 327–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orren, Karen, and Stephen Skowronek. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelan, William. 2015. In Place of Inter-State Retaliation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1996. “The Path to European Integration.” Comparative Political Studies 29 (2): 123–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, Mark. 2013. “The New EU Legal History.” American University International Law Review 28 (5): 1257–1310.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Hjalte. 2007. “Present and Future European Judicial Problems after Enlargement and the Post-2005 Ideological Revolt.” Common Market Law Review 44 (1): 1661–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, George. 1995. Jacques Delors and European Integration. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne. 1992. High-Tech Europe. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Thomas Kearns. 1995. Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sergi Lanau, Anita Tuladhar, Benoît Chevauchez, Gianluca Esposito, Nadege Jassaud, and Stephanie Segal. 2014. Italy: Selected Issues. IMF Country Report no. 14/284. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2014/cr14284.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Martin, and Alec Stone Sweet. 2002. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2004. The Judicial Construction of Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, and Thomas Brunell. 1998a. “Constructing a Supranational Constitution.” American Political Science Review 92 (1): 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 1998b. “The European Court and National Courts.” Journal of European Public Policy 5 (1): 66–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2012. “The European Court of Justice, State Non-compliance, and the Politics of Override.” American Political Science Review 106 (1): 204–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Kathleen Thelen. 2005. Beyond Continuity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tansey, Oisin. 2007. “Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (4): 765–72.Google Scholar
Tribunale di Napoli. 2014. Bilancio sociale 2014. http://www.tribunale.napoli.it/allegatinews/A_7223.pdf.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine. 2015. Brokering Europe: Euro-Lawyers and the Making of a Transnational Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H. 1991. “The Transformation of Europe.” Yale Law Journal 100 (8): 2403–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H. 1994. “A Quiet Revolution.” Comparative Political Studies 26 (4): 510–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wind, Marlene. 2010. “The Nordics, the EU, and the Reluctance towards Supranational Judicial Review.” Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (4): 1039–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zan, Stefano. 2003. Fascicoli e tribunali. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar