Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2022
At least four observationally equivalent theories argue that federal judges follow public opinion when they decide cases. Yet there is mixed empirical support for these theories. Using recently released data on public opinion, we discover that state public opinion exerts a meaningful impact on the votes of federal circuit court judges. Perhaps more important, we leverage a number of different empirical approaches to identify which theory the data support. The data suggest that circuit court judges may change along with society but also that they follow public opinion because they care about their reputations in their home states.
We thank Peter Enns and workshop participants at the University of Maryland, College Park, for helpful feedback. We also thank Deborah Beim, Greg Huber, and workshop participants at the American Politics and Public Policy Workshop at Yale University.