Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-r2nwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-04T02:45:21.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Causes of the Legitimacy-Conferring and Republican Schoolmaster Capabilities of Courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Benjamin Woodson
Benjamin Woodson*
Affiliation:
University of Missouri–Kansas City
*
Contact the author at [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some studies examining the effect of court decisions on public opinion examine their legitimacy-conferring role or ability to cause the public to accept specific policies. Others examine when courts act as a “republican schoolmaster” and change substantive policy attitudes. Using two studies, this article shows that these two effects are driven by different processes and caused by a different form of support. Legitimacy perceptions or diffuse support drives the process that causes people to accept specific policies. The process that changes a person’s substantive policy stance is driven by a person’s evaluation of the court’s previous policy decisions or specific support.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , Fall 2019 , pp. 281 - 303
Copyright
© 2019 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, Vanessa A., and Debra, Javeline. 2007. “The Persuasive Power of Russian Courts.” Political Research Quarterly 60:429–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Brandon L., and Christopher, D. Johnston. 2013. “On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public.” American Journal of Political Science 57:184–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Brandon L., and Diana, C. Mutz. 2009. “Explaining Processes of Institutional Opinion Leadership.” Journal of Politics 71:249–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benesh, Sarah. 2006. “Understanding Public Confidence in American Courts.” Journal of Politics 68:697–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Gregory, A. Huber, and Gabriel, S. Lenz. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20:351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boddery, Scott S., and Jeff, Yates. 2014. “Do Policy Messengers Matter? Majority Opinion Writers as Policy Cues in Public Agreement with Supreme Court Decisions.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (4): 851–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, Chris W., and Melinda, Gann Hall. 2009. In Defense of Judicial Elections. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickman, Danette and David A. M. Peterson. 2006. “Public Opinion Reaction to Repeated Events: Citizen Response to Multiple Supreme Court Abortion Decisions.” Political Behavior 28:87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhrmester, Michael, Tracy Kwang and Samuel, D. Gosling. 2011. “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 (1): 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and James, L. Gibson. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 36:635–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cann, Damon and Jeff, Yates. 2008. “Homegrown Institutional Legitimacy: Assessing Citizens’ Diffuse Support for State Courts.” American Politics Research 36:297–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, Gregory. 1974. “The Supreme Court and Myth: An Empirical Investigation.” Law and Society Review 8:385–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casler, Krista, Lydia Bickel and Elizabeth, Hackett. 2013. “Separate but Equal? A Comparison of Participants and Data Gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, Social Media, and Face-to-Face Behavioral Testing.” Computers in Human Behavior 29:2156–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaiken, Shelly, Akiva Liberman and Alice, Eagly. 1989. “Heuristic and Systematic Processing within and beyond the Persuasion Context.” In Unintended Thought, ed. James S. Uleman and John A. Bargh. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Christenson, Dino P., and David, M. Glick. 2015. “Issue-Specific Opinion Change: The Supreme Court and Health Care Reform.” Public Opinion Quarterly 79 (4): 881–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Tom S., and Jonathan, P. Kastellec. 2015. “Source Cues and Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Politics Research 43 (3): 504–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clawson, Rosalee A., Elizabeth, R. Kegler, and Eric, N. Waltenburg. 2001. “The Legitimacy-Conferring Authority of the U.S. Supreme Court: An Experimental Design.” American Politics Research 29:566–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Geoffrey L. 2003. “Party over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85:808–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6:279–95.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Firth, Krin, David A. Hoffman and Tess, Wilkinson-Ryan. 2018. “Law and Psychology Grows Up, Goes Online, and Replicates.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 15 (2): 320–55.Google Scholar
Fontana, David and Donald, Braman. 2012. “Judicial Backlash or Just Backlash? Evidence from a National Experiment.” Columbia Law Review 112:731–99.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles H., and Liane, C. Kosaki. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review 83:751–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gash, Alison and Michael, H. Murakami. 2015. “Venue Effects: How State Policy Source Influences Policy Support.” Politics and Policy 43:679–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1989. “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance.” Law and Society Review 23:469–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2012. Electing Judges: The Surprising Effects of Campaigning on Judicial Legitimacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Gregory, A. Caldeira. 1995. “The Legitimacy of Transnational Legal Institutions: Compliance, Support, and the European Court of Justice.” American Journal of Political Science 39:459–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Gregory, A. Caldeira. 2003. “Defenders of Democracy? Legitimacy, Popular Acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court.” Journal of Politics 65:1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Gregory, A. Caldeira, and Vanessa, A. Baird. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review 92:343–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Gregory, A. Caldeira, and Lester, Kenyatta Spence. 2003. “Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 47:354–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Gregory, A. Caldeira, and Lester, Kenyatta Spence. 2005. “Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment.” Political Research Quarterly 58:187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Michael, J. Nelson. 2015. “Is the U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology?” American Journal of Political Science 59:162–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin and Naomi, Marukawa. 2002. “Elite Cues and Political Attitude Formation.” In Research in Micropolitics, ed. Delli Carpini, Michael X., Huddy, Leonie, and Shapiro., Robert Y. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hanley, John, Michael Salamone and Matthew, Wright. 2012. “Reviving the Schoolmaster: Reevaluating Public Opinion in the Wake of Roe v. Wade.” Political Research Quarterly 65:408–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth, Theiss-Morse. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J., and Jeffery, A. Segal. 1996. “The Shepherding of Local Public Opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb’s Chapel.” Journal of Politics 58 (4): 1079–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, Robert J. 2011. “State Courts and Policy Legitimation: An Experimental Study of the Ability of State Courts to Change Opinion.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 42:211–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall and Bruce, Hardy. 2008. “Will Ignorance and Partisan Elections of Judges Undermine Public Trust in the Judiciary?” Daedalus 137:11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Timothy R., and Andrew, D. Martin. 1998. “The Public’s Conditional Response to Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 92:299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreitzer, Rebecca J., Allison, J. Hamilton, and Caroline, J. Tolbert. 2014. “Does Policy Adoption Change Opinions on Minority Rights? The Effects of Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage.” Political Research Quarterly 67:795–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Ralph. 1967. “The Supreme Court as Republican Schoolmaster.” Supreme Court Review 1967:127–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur and Mathew, D. McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1990 “Perceived Legitimacy of Supreme Court Decisions: Three Functions of Source Credibility.” Political Behavior 12:363–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1994 “Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court: The Sources and Contexts of Legitimation.” Political Research Quarterly 47:675–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P., and Thomas, G. Hansford. 2014. “Partisans in Robes: Party Cues and Public Acceptance of Supreme Court Decisions.” American Journal of Political Science 58:620–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, Richard E., and John, T. Cacioppo. 1980. “Effects of Issue Involvement on Attitudes in an Advertising Context.” In Proceedings of the Division 23 Program, ed. G. Gorn and M. Goldberg. Montreal: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Petty, Richard E., and Jon, A. Krosnick. 1995. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. New York: Psychology.Google Scholar
Petty, Richard E., and Duane, T. Wegener. 1999. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current Status and Controversies.” In Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, ed. Shelly Chaiken and Yaacov Trope. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Price, Vincent and Anca, Romantan. 2004. “Confidence in Institutions before, during, and after ‘Indecision 2000.’” Journal of Politics 66:939–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salamone, Michael. 2014. “Judicial Consensus and Public Opinion: Conditional Response to Supreme Court Majority Size.” Political Research Quarterly 67:320–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, James, Shaun Bowler and David, Lanoue. 2003. “The Sources of Public Confidence in State Courts: Experience and Institutions.” American Politics Research 31:191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zink, James R., James R. Spriggs II, and John, T. Scott. 2009. “Courting the Public: The Influence of Decision Attributes on Individuals’ Views of Court Opinions.” Journal of Politics 71:909–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Woodson Supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 509.5 KB