Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T11:18:33.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politicization and the Two Modes of Evaluating Judicial Decisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Benjamin Woodson
Benjamin Woodson*
Affiliation:
University of Missouri–Kansas City
*
Contact the author at [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since courts lack control of the purse and the sword, understanding what causes the public to accept court decisions is essential. Using three studies, this paper shows that the public’s perception of the process judges use to make decisions changes the determinants of acceptance. When judges are perceived as using a principled decision-making process, institutional loyalty determines acceptance. When judges are perceived as using a politicized decision-making process, agreement with the policy implications of a decision determines acceptance. These results emphasize the importance of decision-making process perceptions in ensuring that courts can induce voluntary acceptance of their decisions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , Fall 2015 , pp. 193 - 221
Copyright
© 2015 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamany, David, and Grossman, Joel B.. 1983. “Support for the Supreme Court as a National Policy Maker.” Law and Policy Quarterly 5:405–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, Vanessa A. 2001. “Building Institutional Legitimacy: The Role of Procedural Justice.” Political Research Quarterly 54:333–54.Google Scholar
Baird, Vanessa A., and Amy Gangl. 2006. “Shattering the Myth of Legality: The Impact of the Media’s Framing of Supreme Court Procedures on Perceptions of Fairness.” Political Psychology 27:597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, Vanessa A., and Debra Javeline. 2007. “The Persuasive Power of Russian Courts.” Political Research Quarterly 60:429–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Brandon L., and Johnston, Christopher D.. 2011. “Political Justice? Perceptions of Politicization and Public Preferences toward the Supreme Court Appointment Process.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Bartels, Brandon L., and Mutz, Diana C.. 2009. “Explaining Processes of Institutional Opinion Leadership.” Journal of Politics 71:249–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benesh, Sara C. 2006. “Understanding Public Confidence in American Courts.” Journal of Politics 68:697–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20:351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, Gregory. 1974. “The Supreme Court and Myth: An Empirical Investigation.” Law and Society Review 8:385–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Tom S. 2011. The Limits of Judicial Independence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Tom S., and Kastellec, Jonathan P.. 2015. “Source Cues and Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Politics Research 43:504–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clawson, Rosalee A., Kegler, Elizabeth R., and Waltenburg, Eric N.. 2001. “The Legitimacy-Conferring Authority of the U.S. Supreme Court: An Experimental Design.” American Politics Research 29:566–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clawson, Rosalee A., and Waltenburg, Eric N.. 2003. “Support for a Supreme Court Affirmative Action Decision: A Story in Black and White.” American Politics Research 31:251–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6:279–95.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Farganis, Dion. 2012. “Do Reasons Matter? The Impact of Opinion Content on Supreme Court Legitimacy.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (1): 206–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Charles H., and Kosaki, Liane C.. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review 83:751–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, Andrew, and Jennifer Hill. 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1989. “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice and Political Tolerance.” Law and Society Review 23:469–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1991. “Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Compliance with Supreme Court Decisions: A Question of Causality.” Law and Society Review 25:631–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2008. “Campaigning for the Bench: The Corrosive Effects of Campaign Speech?” Law and Society Review 42:899–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A.. 1995. “The Legitimacy of Transnational Legal Institutions: Compliance, Support, and the European Court of Justice.” American Journal of Political Science 39:459–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2003. “Defenders of Democracy? Legitimacy, Popular Acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court.” Journal of Politics 65:1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2009. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations: Positivity Theory and the Judgments of the American People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2011. “Has Legal Realism Damaged the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court?” Law and Society Review 45:195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Lester Kenyatta Spence. 2003. “Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 47:354–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2005. “Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment.” Political Research Quarterly 58:187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Milton Lodge, and Benjamin Woodson. 2014. “Losing, but Accepting: Legitimacy, Positivity Theory, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority.” Law and Society Review 48 (4): 837–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K. 2011. The Nature of Supreme Court Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hillygus, D. Sunshine, and Shields, Todd G.. 2008. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J. 1995. “The Supreme Court and Opinion Change: An Experimental Study of the Court’s Ability to Change Opinion.” American Politics Research 23:109–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J., and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 1996. “The Shepherding of Local Public Opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb’s Chapel.” Journal of Politics 58:1079–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaros, Dean, and Robert Roper. 1980. “The U.S. Supreme Court: Myth, Diffuse Support, Specific Support and Legitimacy.” American Politics Research 8:85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Timothy R., and Martin, Andrew D.. 1998. “The Public’s Conditional Response to Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 92:299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavine, Howard, Christopher Johnston, and Marco Steenbergen. 2012. The Ambivalent Partisan: How Critical Loyalty Promotes Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles S.. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George, W. Russell Neuman, and Michael Mackuen. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Thomas R. 1989. Public Opinion and the Supreme Court. London: Hyman.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery R. 1990. “Perceived Legitimacy of Supreme Court Decisions: Three Functions of Source Credibility.” Political Behavior 12:363–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery R. 1994. “Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court: The Sources and Contexts of Legitimation.” Political Research Quarterly 47:675–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Walter F., and Joseph Tanenhaus. 1968. “Public Opinion and the United States Supreme Court: Mapping of Some Prerequisites for Court Legitimation of Regime Changes.” Law and Society Review 2:357–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P., and Hansford, Thomas G.. 2014. “Partisans in Robes: Party Cues and Public Acceptance of Supreme Court Decisions.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (3): 620–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheb, John M., II, and William Lyons. 2000. “The Myth of Legality and Public Evaluation of the Supreme Court.” Social Science Quarterly 81:928–40.Google Scholar
Simon, D., and N. Scurich. 2011. “Lay Judgments of Judicial Decision Making.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 8:709–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skitka, Linda J., Bauman, Christopher W., and Lytle, Brad L.. 2009. “Limits on Legitimacy: Moral and Religious Convictions as Constraints on Deference to Authority.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97:567–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, Tom R. 2006. “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation.” Annual Review of Psychology 57:375–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, Tom R., and Kenneth Rasinski. 1991. “Procedural Justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular U.S. Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson.” Law and Society Review 25:621–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, George S. 2005. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 2007. Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zink, James, James Spriggs II, and John Scott. 2009. “Courting the Public: The Influence of Decision Attributes on Individuals’ Views of Court Opinions.” Journal of Politics 71:909–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar