Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:18:21.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commanding Legality

The Juridification of Immigration Policy Making in France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Leila Kawar
Leila Kawar*
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University
*
Contact the author at [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The emergence of constitutional review in France has attracted substantial attention from scholars of public law. Yet little has been written about the political implications of the expansion of rights-based review on the part of France’s highest administrative jurisdiction, the Conseil d’Etat. The argument is made in this article that repeat litigation by French lawyers defending the cause of immigrants is an important site for observing the symbolic power of legal forms. The analysis focuses on cases challenging immigration-related administrative regulations and shows how the process of repeatedly adjudicating these issues has focused attention away from litigants and their claims at the same time that it has reinforced the centrality of the Conseil d’Etat and its formalist jurisprudence in administrative governance. This detailed examination of the practical operation of France’s highest administrative jurisdiction leads to the surprising conclusion that this distinctly nonadversarial form of adjudication has contributed over the long term to institutionalizing a juridification of immigration-related administrative policy making.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , Spring 2014 , pp. 93 - 116
Copyright
© 2014 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author would like to express her thanks to Pamela Brandwein, Lynette Chua, David Klein, Mitchel Lasser, Johann Morri, Michael McCann, and Stephen Wasby for their comments and suggestions in preparing this article for publication. I especially thank Mark Massoud, since it was through our ongoing collaboration that I was prompted to develop and sharpen the theoretical framework in this article. Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Cornell Law School Research Colloquium and at the Western Political Science Association and Law and Society Association annual meetings.

References

Abdelgawad, , Elizabeth, , and Weber, Anne. 2008. “The Reception Process in France and Germany.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, ed. Keller, Helen and Alec Stone Sweet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bissuel, Bertrand. 2007. “Le Conseil d’Etat annule l’arreté du ministre de l’intérieur créant le fichier ELOI” [The Conseil d’Etat annuls the minister of interior’s decision creating the ELOI database]. Le Monde, March 14.Google Scholar
Cole, Joshua. 2003. “Remembering the Battle of Paris: 17 October 1961 in French and Algerian Memory.” French Politics, Culture and Society 21 (3): 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Bo. 1997. “Procedures for Expedited Removal and Asylum Screening under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996.” Connecticut Law Review 29:1501–24.Google Scholar
Couso, , Javier, , Huneeus, Alexandra, and Sieder, Rachel. 2010. Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutin, Susan. 1993. The Culture of Protest: Religious Activism and the U.S. Sanctuary Movement. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Dauvergne, Catherine. 2008. Making People Illegal: What Globalization Means for Migration and Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226772424.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
François, Bastien. 1997. Naissance d’une constitution [The birth of a constitution]. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Genevois, Bruno. 2009. “Le GISTI: Requérant d’habitude? La vision du Conseil d’Etat” [GISTI: A repeat litigator? The vision from the Conseil d’Etat]. In Défendre la cause des etrangers en justice [Defending the cause of foreigners in the courts], ed. GISTI, 65–79. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Ginesy-Galano, Mireille. 1984. Les immigrés hors la cité: Le système d’encadrement dans les foyers [Immigrants outside the city: The system of supervision in the immigrant worker dormitories]. Paris: Editions l’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2012. “Courts and New Democracies: Recent Works.” Law and Social Inquiry 37:720–42.10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01318.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
GISTI (Groupe d’information et de soutien des travailleurs immigrés). 1988. “Les rafistolages du Conseil d’Etat” [The patchwork of the Conseil d’Etat]. Plein Droit 2 (February): 49–51.Google Scholar
GISTI (Groupe d’information et de soutien des travailleurs immigrés). 1992. “Droit d’asile: Suite et … fin?” [The right to asylum: Next and … last?]. Plein Droit, nos. 18–19 (October).Google Scholar
Guiraudon, Virginie. 2000. Les politiques d’Immigration en Europe: Allemagne, France, Pays-Bas [The politics of immigration in Europe: Germany, France, Netherlands]. Collection Logiques politiques. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1986. “Law as Medium and Law as Institution.” In Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State, ed. Teubner, Gunther, 203–20. New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hervo, , Monique, , and Charras, Marie-Ange. 1971. Bidonvilles: l’Enlisement [Bidonvilles: Stalemate]. Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hollifield, James F. 2004. “The Emerging Migration State.” International Migration Review 38 (3): 885–906.10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00223.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. 2001. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674039278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafon, Jacqueline Lucienne. 1994. “La judicialisation de la politique en France” [The judicialization of politics in France]. International Political Science Review 15 (2): 135–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasser, Mitchel. 2004. Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Transparency and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laurens, Sylvain. 2009. Une politisation feutrée: Les hauts fonctionnaires et l’immigration en France, 1962–1981 [A hushed politicization: Elite civil servants and immigration in France, 1962–1981]. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
Law, Anna O. 2010. The Immigration Battle in American Courts. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Mary Dewhurst. 2007. The Boundaries of the Republic: Migrant Rights and the Limits of Universalism in France, 1918–1940. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lochak, Danièle. 1985. Etrangers, de quel droit? Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Lochak, Danièle. 1993. “Quelle legitimité pour le juge administratif?” [What legitimacy for the administrative judge?]. In Droit et politique, ed. Centre Universitaire de Recherches sur l’Action Publique et le Politique, 141–57. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Lochak, Danièle. 2009. “Trente ans de contentieux à l’initiative du GISTI” [Thirty years of GISTI litigation]. In Défendre la cause des etrangers en justice [Defending the cause of foreigners in the courts], ed. GISTI, 43–64. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Martin, David A. 2002. “Behind the Scenes on a Different Set: What Congress Needs to Do in the Aftermath of St. Cyr and Nguyen.” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 16:313–38.Google Scholar
Moreau, Gerard. 2009. “Circulaires et droit.” In Défendre la cause des etrangers en justice [Defending the cause of foreigners in the courts], ed. GISTI, 241–45. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Noiriel, Gerard. 2001. Etat, nation et immigration [State, nation and immigration]. Trans. Laforcarde, Geoffroy de. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Roussel, Violaine. 2002. Affaires de juges: Les magistrats dans les scandales politiques en France [Judicial affairs: Magistrates in political scandals in France]. Paris: La Découverte.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schain, Martin A. 2008. The Politics of Immigration in France, Britain, and the United States. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnapper, Dominique. 2010. Une sociologue au Conseil Constitutionnel [A sociologist at the Constitutional Council]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Gordon. 2009. Law’s Allure: How Law Shapes, Constrains, Saves, and Kills Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siméant, Johanna. 1998. La cause des Sans-Papiers [The cause of the Sans-Papiers]. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Spire, Alexis. 2005. Etrangers á la carte: L’administration de l’immigration en France, 1945–1975. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 1992. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 1999. “Judicialization and the Construction of Governance.” Comparative Political Studies 32:147–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, and Brunell, Thomas L.. 2013. “Judicialization of International Regimes.” Journal of Law and Courts 1 (1): 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Togman, Jeffrey M. 2001. The Ramparts of Nations. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Vallinder, Torbjorn. 1994. “The Judicialization of Politics: A World-Wide Phenomenon; Introduction.” International Political Science Review 15 (2): 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viet, Vincent. 1998. La France immigré: Construction d’une politique, 1914–1997 [Immigrant France: Construction of a politics, 1914–1997]. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Weil, Patrick. 2004. La France et ses etrangers: L’aventure d’une politique de l’immigration, de 1938 à nos jours [France and her foreigners: The adventure of immigration politics, 1938 to the present]. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H. 1994. “A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice and Its Interlocutors.” Comparative Political Studies 26 (January): 510–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Patricia J. 2009. “The Ideational Foundations of Israel’s ‘Constitutional Revolution.’” Political Research Quarterly 62 (4): 811–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Patricia J., and Hilbink, Lisa. 2009. “Comparative Sources of Judicial Empowerment: Ideas and Interests.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (4): 745–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zappi, Sylvia. 2000. “Le Conseil d’Etat annule plusieurs dispositions d’une circulaire sur le droit d’asile territorial” [The Conseil d’Etat annuls several provisions of a circular on the right to territorial asylum]. Le Monde, January 28.Google Scholar
Zappi, Sylvia. 2002. “Bercy veut limiter le cout des pensions des anciens combattants etrangers” [Bercy wants to limit the cost of pensions for foreign veterans]. Le Monde, January 5.Google Scholar