Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:40:03.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Checklist of the cestode parasites of wild birds of Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2021

F.B. Drago*
Affiliation:
División Zoología Invertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Paseo del Bosque, s/n, 1900La Plata, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la provincia de Buenos Aires (CIC), Calle 526 e/10 y 11 (1900) La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
M. Dueñas Díaz
Affiliation:
División Zoología Invertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Paseo del Bosque, s/n, 1900La Plata, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de Argentina, Godoy Cruz 2290 (C1425FQB) CABA, Argentina
R. Draghi
Affiliation:
División Zoología Invertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Paseo del Bosque, s/n, 1900La Plata, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de Argentina, Godoy Cruz 2290 (C1425FQB) CABA, Argentina
V. Núñez
Affiliation:
División Zoología Invertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Paseo del Bosque, s/n, 1900La Plata, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la provincia de Buenos Aires (CIC), Calle 526 e/10 y 11 (1900) La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
*
Author for correspondence: F.B. Drago, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

An annotated checklist of the cestode parasites of Argentinean wild birds is presented, as the result of a compilation of parasitological papers published between 1900 and April 2021. This review provides data on hosts, geographical distribution, sites of infection, location of material deposited in helminthological collections, references and taxonomic comments. A host/parasite list is also provided. During this period, 38 papers were published that gather information about 34 cestode nominal species and 11 taxa identified at generic level, belonging to three orders, ten families and 35 genera. The highest number of cestode taxa was recorded in the family Hymenolepididae, with 12 nominal species and two taxa identified at generic level, followed by Dilepididae, with eight nominal species and three taxa identified at generic level. Of the 1042 species of birds reported in Argentina, only 29 (2.8%) were reported as hosts of adult cestodes. The families of birds with the highest number of reported taxa were Laridae and Anatidae, with 20 and 14 taxa, respectively.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alves, PV, de Chambrier, A, Scholz, T and Luque, JL (2017) Annotated checklist of fish cestodes from South America. ZooKeys 650, 1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, R (1909) Cotylorhipis furnarii (Del Pont) Nouveau genre de téniadés. Archives de Parasitologie 13, 477482.Google Scholar
Boero, JJ and Led, JE (1968) El parasitismo de la fauna autóctona. III. Los parásitos de las aves Argentinas. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, La Plata 10, 97129.Google Scholar
Boero, JJ, Menéndez, NA, Led, JE and Brandetti, E (1968) Estudios parasitológico y bacteriológico en perdices (Nothura maculosa). Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias de La Plata 10(23), 321330.Google Scholar
Boero, JJ, Led, JE and Brandetti, E (1972a) El parasitismo de la fauna autóctona. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria, Buenos Aires 1, 1729.Google Scholar
Boero, JJ, Led, JE and Brandetti, E (1972b) Algunos parásitos de la avifauna Argentina. Analecta Veterinaria 4, 1734.Google Scholar
Bona, FV (1983a) Variability and growth of cestodes; premises to a biometric analysis. Dendrouterina pilherodiae meridionalis n. subsp., parasite of Egretta alba (Ciconiiformes) in Argentina and redescription of the type of D. pilherodiae Mahon, 1956 (Cestoda, Dilepididae) Part I. Rivista di Parassitologia 4(2), 279297.Google Scholar
Bona, FV (1983b) Variability and growth of cestodes; premises to a biometric analysis. Dendrouterina pilherodiae meridionalis n. subsp., parasite of Egretta alba (Ciconiiformes) in Argentina and redescription of the type of D. pilherodiae Mahon, 1956 (Cestoda Dilepididae) Part II. Rivista di Parassitologia 44(3), 425469.Google Scholar
Bona, F (1994) Three new species and genera of Dilepididae (Cestoda, Cyclophyllidea) from neotropical Picidae (Aves). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 101(1), 195213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bona, FV and Maffi, AV (1984a) La estructura del género Paruterina Fuhrm., 1906 y Fuhrm., 1902, Proparuterina Fuhrm., 1911 y Sphaeruterina Johnston, 1914 (Cestoda, Paruterinidae). Bollettino del Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali di Torino 2(2), 411444.Google Scholar
Bona, FV and Maffi, AV (1984b) Paruterina similita n. sp. (Cestoda, Paruterinidae) en Cuculidae (Aves) del Norte de Argentina. Bollettino del Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali di Torino 2(1), 181198.Google Scholar
Bona, FV and Maffi, AV (1985) Redescripción y variabilidad de Paruterina similis (Ransom, 1909) (Cestoda, Paruterinidae), recolectada en un neuvo hospedador, Coccyzus melacoryphus (Cuculiformes) en el norte de Argentina. Rivista di Parassitologia 46, 115139.Google Scholar
Bona, FV, Bosco, MC and Maffi, A (1986) Tre nuove specie del genera Paruterina (Cestoda, Paruterinidae) in Trogoniformi (Aves) neotropicali. Bollettino del Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali di Torino 4(1), 161.Google Scholar
Bondarenko, SK and Kontrimavichus, VL (2001) Aploparaksis americanensis sp. nov. and A. paraspinosus sp. nov., two new species of cestodes (Hymenolepididae) from snipe in America. Zoologicheskiy Zhurnal 80(3), 269277.Google Scholar
Bondarenko, SK and Kontrimavichus, VL (2018) Revision of Aploparaksis Clerc, 1903 (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea, Aploparaksidae), with keys to the species of the genus. Biologija 64(1), 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bump, G and Bump, JW (1969) A study of the spotted tinamous and the pale spotted tinamous of Argentina. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife 120, 1160.Google Scholar
Caira, JN and Jensen, K (2017) Planetary biodiversity inventory (2008–2017): tapeworms from the vertebrate bowels of the earth. Lawrence, Kansas, University of Kansas, Natural History Museum, Special Publication No. 25. p. 463.Google Scholar
Caira, JN, Jensen, K and Barbeau, E (2012) Global cestode database. Available at http://tapeworms.uconn.edu/index.html (accessed 1 April 2021).Google Scholar
Carlson, CJ, Dallas, TA, Alexander, LW, Phelan, AL and Phillips, AJ (2020) What would it take to describe the global diversity of parasites? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 287, 20201841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casalins, L, Arbetman, M, Semenas, L, Veleizán, A, Flores, VR and Viozzi, G (2015) Difilobotriosis en gaviota. Pasado y presente de esta zoonosis en Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi. Revista Argentina de Zoonosis y Enfernedades Infecciosas Emergentes 10(1), 3839.Google Scholar
Diaz, JI, Cremonte, F and Navone, GT (2010) Helminths of the Magellanic penguin, Spheniscus magellanicus (Sphenisciformes), during the breeding season in Patagonian Coast, Chubut, Argentina. Comparative Parasitology 77(2), 172177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, JI, Cremonte, F and Navone, GT (2011) Helminths of the kelp gull, Larus dominicanus, from the northern Patagonian coast. Parasitology Research 109, 15551562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Digiani, MC (2000) Digeneans and cestodes parasitic in the white–faced ibis Plegadis chihi (Aves: Threskiornithidae) from Argentina. Folia Parasitologica 47, 195204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drago, FB and Lunaschi, LI (2015) Update of checklist of digenean parasites of wild birds from Argentina, with comments about the extent of their inventory. Neotropical Helminthology 9(2), 325350.Google Scholar
Drago, FB, Núñez, V and Dueñas Díaz, M (2020) Checklist of the nematode parasites of wild birds from Argentina. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 127(1), 4361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estebon de Ulibarrie, M and Beltzer, AH (1998) Presencia de Hymenolepis coronula (Cyclophyllidea: Hymenolepididae) en aves de la especie Butorides striatus (Aves: Ardeidae). Revista Ceres 45(259), 293294.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O (1900) Neue eigenthümliche Vogeltäenien (Ein getrenntgeschlechtiger Cestode). Zoologischer Anzeiger Bd 23 H 605, 4851.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O (1901) Neue eigenthümliche Bogeltaenien. Zoologischer Anzeiger. Band. XXIII 606, 4851.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O (1907) Bekannte und neue Arten und Genera von Vögeltaenien. Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde und Infektionskranheiten, Abteilung I 45, 516536.Google Scholar
Gibson, DI, Bray, RA and Harris, EA (2005) Host–Parasite Database of the Natural History Museum, London. Available at https://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/scientific-resources/taxonomy-systematics/host-parasites/database/index.jsp (accessed 3 April 2021).Google Scholar
Guagliardo, SE, Graff, ME, Gigola, G and Tanzola, RD (2020) Biological aspects of the life history of Confluaria podicipina (Cestoda, Hymenolepididae) from a hypersaline pampasic lagoon. Pan–American Journal of Aquatic Sciences 15(1), 5463.Google Scholar
Hernández-Orts, JS, Kuchta, R, Semenas, L, Crespo, EA, González, RA and Aznar, FJ (2019) An annotated list of the Acanthocephala from Argentina. Zootaxa 4663, 164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Justo, MCN, Fernandes, BMM, Knoff, M, Cárdenas, MQ and Cohen, SC (2017) Checklist of Brazilian Cestoda. Neotropical Helminthology 11(1), 187282.Google Scholar
Kreiter, A and Semenas, L (1997) Helmintos parásitos de Larus dominicanus en la Patagonia Argentina. Boletín chileno de parasitología 52, 3942.Google Scholar
Labriola, JB and Suriano, DM (2000) Wardium paucispinosum sp. n. (Eucestoda: Hymenolepididae), parasite of Larus maculipennis (Aves: Laridae) in Mar del Plata, Argentina; with comments on Wardium semiductilis (Szidat, 1964) comb. n. Folia Parasitologica 47, 205210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labriola, JB and Suriano, DM (2001) Community structure of parasitic helminths of birds of the genus Larus from Mar del Plata, Argentina. Vie et Milieu 51, 6776.Google Scholar
Lepage, D (2019) Avibase – bird checklists of the world. Available at http://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/avibase.jsp (accessed 15 May 2021).Google Scholar
Lunaschi, LI, Cremonte, F and Drago, FB (2007) Checklist of digenean parasites of birds from Argentina. Zootaxa 1403, 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcó del Pont, A (1906) Sobre una nueva especie de Taenia (Taenia furnarii). Anales del Círculo Médico Argentino 29(9–10), 239248.Google Scholar
Mariaux, J, Kuchta, R and Hoberg, EP (2017) Tetrabothriidea Baer, 1954. pp. 357370 in Caira, JN and K, Jensen (Eds) Planetary biodiversity inventory (2008–2017): tapeworms from vertebrate bowels of the earth. Lawrence, University of Kansas, Natural History Museum, Special Publication No. 25.Google Scholar
Oyarzún-Ruiz, P and González-Acuña, D (2021) Checklist and state of knowledge of helminths in wild birds from Chile: an update. Austral Journal of Veterinary Sciences 53, 6372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parona, C (1900) Di alcuni Elminti del Museo Nacional di Buenos Aires. Comunicaciones del Museo Nacional de Buenos Aires 1, 190196.Google Scholar
Pazos, GE, Laurenti, S and Diaz, JI (2003) Helmintofauna del pingüino de magallanes (Spheniscus magellanicus) en Península Valdés, provincia del Chubut. Resultados preliminares. Historia Natural (Segunda Serie) 2(10), 8594.Google Scholar
Rausch, R and Morgan, BB (1947) The genus Anonchotaenia (Cestoda: Dilepididae) from North American birds, with the description of a new species. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 66(2), 203211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rocka, A (2017) Cestodes and nematodes of Antarctic fishes and birds. pp. 77107 in Klimpel, S, T, Kuhn and H, Mehlhorn (Eds) Biodiversity and evolution of parasitic life in the Southern Ocean, parasitology research monographs. Switzerland, Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roesler, F and González Táboas, F (2016) Lista de las aves Argentinas. p. 68. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Aves Argentinas/AOP.Google Scholar
Semenas, L, Viozzi, G and Arbetman, M (2021) Regional study of the zoonotic broad tapeworm Dibothriocephalus spp. in Northwestern Patagonia (Argentina): origin of fishes and coastal cities as factors affecting infection in fishes. Parasitology Research 120, 2415–2427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silveira, EF and Amato, SB (2008) Diploposthe laevis (Bloch) Jacobi (Eucestoda, Hymenolepididae) from Netta peposaca (Vieillot) (Aves: Anatidae): first record for the Neotropical Region and a new host. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 25(1), 8388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silveira, EF and Amato, SB (2010) Microsomacanthus hopkinsi (Eucestoda, Hymenolepididae) in Netta peposaca (Aves, Anatidae) in South America. Neotropical Helminthology 4(2), 105111.Google Scholar
Szidat, L (1964) Vergleichende Helminthologische untersuchungen an den argentinischen grossmöwen Larus marinus dominicanus Lichtenstein und Larus ridibundus maculipennis Lichtenstein nebst neuen beobachtungen über die artbildung bei parasiten. Zeitschrift fur Parasitenkunde 24, 351414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szidat, L and Soria, M (1957) Difilobotriasis en nuestro país. Sobre una nueva especie de Sparganum parásita de salmones y de Diphyllobothrium, parásita de gaviotas del lago Nahuel Huapi. Boletín del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales. Bernardino Rivadavia e Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones de las Ciencias Naturales 9, 128.Google Scholar
Tanzola, RD (1989) Davainea himantopodis Johnston, 1911 (Eucestoda; Davaineidae) parasito del tero real Himantopus melanurus Vieillot, 1817 (Aves; Recurvirostridae), en la Region Neotropical. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 24(1), 913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzola, RD (1992) Diorchis pararansomi sp. n. from Fulica armillata Vieillot in Argentina (Cestoda: Hymeno1epididae). Helminthologia 29, 4548.Google Scholar
Tanzola, RD, Guagliardo, SE and Gigola, G (2019) Dioecocestus paronai Fuhrmann, 1900 (Cestoda, Cyclophyllidea) parasite of the white–tufted grebe Rollandia rolland (Quoy and Gaimard, 1824) (Podicipediformes) and a review of the host specificity in Dioecocestidae. Neotropical Helminthology 13(2), 245252.Google Scholar
Waeschenbach, A, Webster, BL and Littlewood, DT (2012) Adding resolution to ordinal level relationships of tapeworms (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda) with large fragments of mtDNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 63, 834847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waeschenbach, A, Brabec, J, Scholz, T, Littlewood, DTJ and Kuchta, R (2017) The catholic taste of broad tapeworms – multiple routes to human infection. International Journal for Parasitology 47(13), 831843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yorio, P, Marinao, C, Retana, MV and Suárez, N (2013) Differential use of food resources between the Kelp Gull Larus dominicanus and the Threatened Olrog's Gull L. atlanticus. Ardeola 60(1), 2944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zdzitowiecki, K and Cielecka, D (1984) Anomotaenia dominicana (Railliet and Henry, 1912) (Cestoda, Dilepididae) from the Dominican gull Larus dominicanus Licht. of the Antarctic. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 29(1–8), 4958.Google Scholar