Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T00:19:39.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The children of preterm survivors: shyness, parenting, and parental stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2019

Ryan J. Van Lieshout*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, OntarioCanada
Lindsay Favotto
Affiliation:
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Mark Ferro
Affiliation:
School of Public Health and Healthy Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Alison Niccols
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, OntarioCanada
Saroj Saigal
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Katherine M. Morrison
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Louis A. Schmidt
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
*
Address for correspondence: Ryan Van Lieshout, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences McMaster University, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, West 5th Campus, 100 West 5th Street, Hamilton ON, L8N 3K7, Canada. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) survivors have higher rates of shyness, a risk factor for poorer outcomes across the life span. Due to advances in fetal and neonatal medicine, the first generation of ELBW survivors have survived to adulthood and become parents. However, no studies have investigated the transmission of their stress vulnerability to their offspring. We explored this phenomenon using a population-based cohort of ELBW survivors and normal birth weight (NBW) controls. Using data from three generations, we examined whether the shyness and parenting stress of ELBW and NBW participants (Generation 2) mediated the relation between the parenting style of their parents (Generation 1) and shyness in their offspring (Generation 3), and the extent to which exposure to perinatal adversity (Generation 2) moderated this mediating effect. We found that among ELBW survivors, parenting stress (in Generation 2) mediated the relation between overprotective parenting style in Generation 1 (grandparents) and child shyness in Generation 3. These findings suggest that perinatal adversity and stress may be transmitted to the next generation in humans, as reflected in their perceptions of their children as shy and socially anxious, a personality phenotype that may subsequently place their children at risk of later mental and physical health problems.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Waxman, JA, Van Lieshout, RJ, Boyle, MH, et al. Linking extremely low birth weight and internalizing behaviors in adult survivors: Influences of neuroendocrine dysregulation. Dev Psychobiol. 2015; 57: 486496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Lieshout, RJ, Boyle, MH, Saigal, S, et al. Mental health of extremely low birth weight survivors in their 30s. Pediatrics. 135. Epub ahead of print 2015. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-3143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saigal, S, Feeny, D, Rosenbaum, P, et al. Self-perceived health status and health-related quality of life of extremely low-birth weight infants at adolescence. JAMA. 1996; 276: 453459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saigal, S, Szatmari, P, Rosenbaum, P, et al. Cognitive abilities and school performance of extremely low birth weight children and matched term control children at age 8 years: a regional study. J Pediatr. 1991; 118: 751760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, DC, Plomin, R.Temperament in early childhood. J Pers Assess. 1977; 41: 150156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, AH, Plomin, R.Temperament: Early Developing Personality Traits, 1984. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Abidin, R.Parenting Stress Index: Professional Manual, Third Edition 1995. Lutz, Florida: Psychology Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Reitman, D, Currier, RO, Stickle, TR.A critical evaluation of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF) in a Head Start population. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2002; 31: 384392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruch, MA., Gorsky, JM, Collins, TM, et al. Shyness and sociability reexamined: a multicomponent analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989; 57: 904915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheek, JM.The Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness Scale, 1983. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley College.Google Scholar
Cheek, JM, Buss, AH.Shyness and sociability. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1981; 41: 330339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G.The parental bonding Instrument: psychometric properties reviewed. Psychiatr Dev . 1989; 7: 317335.Google ScholarPubMed
Parker, G, Mater, R.Predicting schizophrenic relapse: a comparison of two measures. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1986; 20: 8286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilhelm, K, Niven, H, Parker, G, et al. The stability of the parental bonding instrument over a 20-year period. Psychol Med . 2005; 35: 387393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsuaki, MN, Leve, LD, Neiderhiser, JM, et al. Intergenerational transmission of risk for social inhibition: the interplay between parental responsiveness and genetic influences. Dev Psychopathol. 2013; 25: 261274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradburn, NM.The Structure of Psychological Well-Being, 1969. Chicago, IL: Aidine Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hollingshead, AB.Two-Factor Index of Social Interaction, 1969. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, DP.Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis, 2008. Hoboken, NJ, US: Erlbaum Psych Press.Google Scholar
Zou, G, Donner, A.Construction of confidence limits about effect measures: a general approach. Stat Med. 2008; 27: 16931702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schreiber, JB, Nora, A, Stage, FK, et al. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J Educ Res. 2006; 99: 323337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assel, MA, Landry, SH, Swank, PR, et al. How do mothers’ childrearing histories, stress and parenting affect children’s behavioural outcomes? Child Care Health Dev. 2002; 28: 359368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tully, LA, Arseneault, L, Caspi, A, et al. Does maternal warmth moderate the effects of birth weight on twins’ attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms and low IQ? J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004; 72: 218226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, JJ, McLeod, BD, Sigman, M, et al. Parenting and childhood anxiety: theory, empirical findings, and future directions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003; 44: 134–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, J, Rether, K, Gröger, N, et al. Perinatal programming of emotional brain circuits: an integrative view from systems to molecules. Front Neurosci. 2014; 8: 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Den Bergh, BRH.Developmental programming of early brain and behaviour development and mental health: a conceptual framework. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011; 53: 1923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gluckman, PD, Hanson, MA, Cooper, C, et al. Effect of In Utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 6173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Donnell, KJ, Meaney, MJ.Fetal origins of mental health: the developmental origins of health and disease hypothesis. Am J Psychiatry. 2017; 174: 319328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, R, O’Connor, T, Dunn, J, et al. The effects of child sexual abuse in later family life; mental health, parenting and adjustment of offspring. Child Abus Negl. 2004; 28: 525545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, AL, Chen, Y, Slopen, N, et al. Maternal experience of abuse in childhood and depressive symptoms in adolescent and adult offspring: a 21-year longitudinal study. Depress Anxiety. 2015; 32: 709719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, J, Wainstock, T, Braun, K, et al. Stress in Utero: prenatal programming of brain plasticity and cognition. Biol Psychiatry. 2015; 78: 315326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klosin, A, Casas, E, Hidalgo-Carcedo, C, et al. Transgenerational transmission of environmental information in C. elegans. Science (80). 2017; 356: 320323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crudo, A, Petropoulos, S, Moisiadis, VG, et al. Prenatal synthetic glucocorticoid treatment changes DNA methylation states in male organ systems: multigenerational effects. Endocrinology. 2012; 153: 32693283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, F, Harold, GT, Boivin, J, et al. The links between prenatal stress and offspring development and psychopathology: disentangling environmental and inherited influences. Psychol Med. 2010; 40: 335–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, KM, Ramsingh, L, Gunn, E, et al. Cardiometabolic health in adults born premature with extremely low birth weight. Pediatrics. Epub ahead of print 2016: 138. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-0515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, TL, Johnson, SB, Goodman, E. Breaking the intergenerational cycle of disadvantage: The three generation approach. Pediatrics; Epub ahead of print 2016 137. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-2467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar