Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:31:13.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monolingual and bilingual children's processing of coarticulation cues during spoken word recognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2020

Félix DESMEULES-TRUDEL Open the ORCID record for Félix DESMEULES-TRUDEL [Opens in a new window] ,
Charlotte MOORE  and
Tania S. ZAMUNER
Félix DESMEULES-TRUDEL*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Ottawa Department of Psychology (Brain and Mind Institute), University of Western Ontario
Charlotte MOORE
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Duke University
Tania S. ZAMUNER
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Ottawa
*
*Corresponding author: Western Interdisciplinary Research Building 5182 University of Western Ontario London, ONN6A 3K7Canada E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bilingual children cope with a significant amount of phonetic variability when processing speech, and must learn to weigh phonetic cues differently depending on the cues’ respective roles in their two languages. For example, vowel nasalization is coarticulatory and contrastive in French, but coarticulatory-only in English. In this study, we extended an investigation of the processing of coarticulation in two- to three-year-old English monolingual children (Zamuner, Moore & Desmeules-Trudel, 2016) to a group of four- to six-year-old English monolingual children and age-matched English–French bilingual children. Using eye tracking, we found that older monolingual children and age-matched bilingual children showed more sensitivity to coarticulation cues than the younger children. Moreover, when comparing the older monolinguals and bilinguals, we found no statistical differences between the two groups. These results offer support for the specification of coarticulation in word representations, and indicate that, in some cases, bilingual children possess language processing skills similar to monolinguals.

Keywords

coarticulation processinglanguage developmentbilingualismeye tracking
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 47 , Issue 6 , November 2020 , pp. 1189 - 1206
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archangeli, D. (1988). Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology, 5(2), 183–207. doi:10.1017/s0952675700002268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, L. M. D., & Joanisse, M. F. (2011). Electrophysiological responses to coarticulatory and word level miscues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(4), 1275–1291. doi:10.1037/a0023506Google ScholarPubMed
Baayen, R. H., van Rij, J., de Cat, C., & Wood, S. (2018). Autocorrelated Errors in Experimental Data in the Language Sciences: Some Solutions Offered by Generalized Additive Mixed Models. In Speelman, D., Heylen, K., & Geeraerts, D. (Eds.), Mixed-Effects Regression Models in Linguistics, (pp. 49–69). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69830-4_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barcroft, J., & Sommers, M. S. (2005). Effects of acoustic variability on second language vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(3), 387–414. doi:10.1017/s0272263105050175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J. (2008). Analyzing “visual world” eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 457–474. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddor, P. S. (2009). A coarticulatory path to sound change. Language, 85(4), 785–821. doi:10.1353/lan.0.0165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddor, P. S., McGowan, K. B., Boland, J. E., Coetzee, A. W., & Brasher, A. (2013). The time course of perception of coarticulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(4), 2350–2366. doi:10.1121/1.4794366CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brasileiro Reis Pereira, I. (2009). The Effects of Bilingualism on Children's Perception of Speech Sounds. Utrecht, NL: LOT.Google Scholar
Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. M. (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology, 3, 219–252. doi:10.1017/s0952675700000658Google Scholar
Buckler, H., & Fikkert, P. (2016). Dutch and German 3-year-olds’ representations of voicing alternations. Language and Speech, 59(2), 236–265. doi:10.1177/0023830915587038CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burns, T. C., Yoshida, K. A., Hill, K., & Werker, W. F. (2007). The development of phonetic representation in bilingual and monolingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(3), 455–474. doi:10.1017/s0142716407070257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G. (2012) Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 240–250. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byers-Heinlein, K. (2013). Parental language mixing: Its measurement and the relation of mixed input to young bilingual children's vocabulary size. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 32–48. doi:10.1017/s1366728912000120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers-Heinlein, K., & Fennell, C. T. (2014). Perceptual narrowing in the context of increased variation: Insights from bilingual infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 56(2), 274–291. doi:10.1002/dev.21167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byers-Heinlein, K., Fennell, C. T., & Werker, J. F. (2013). The development of associative word learning in monolingual and bilingual infants. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 198–205. doi:10.1017/S1366728912000417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, A. C. (1990). Phonetic and phonological rules of nasalization (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Cross, A. M., & Joanisse, M. F. (2018). Eyetracking of coarticulatory cue responses in children and adults. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(10), 1315–1324. doi:10.1080/23273798.2018.1484148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahan, D., Magnuson, J. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Hogan, E. M. (2001). Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16(5–6), 507–534. doi:10.1080/01690960143000074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delattre, P. (1965). La nasalité vocalique en français et en anglais. The French Review, 39(1), 92–109.Google Scholar
Desmeules-Trudel, F. (2018). Spoken word recognition in native and second language Canadian French: Phonetic detail and representation of vowel nasalization (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.Google Scholar
Desmeules-Trudel, F., & Brunelle, M. (2018). Phonotactic restrictions condition the realization of vowel nasality and nasal coarticulation: Duration and airflow measurements in Québécois French and Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Phonetics, 69, 43–61. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2018.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmeules-Trudel, F., & Zamuner, T. S. (2019). Gradient and categorical patterns of spoken-word recognition and processing of phonetic details. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01693-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabiano, L., & Goldstein, B. (2005). Phonological cross-linguistic effects in bilingual Spanish – English speaking children. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 3(1), 56–63. doi:10.1080/14769670400027316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical science. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 171–191. doi:10.3758/bf03193146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2007). Language contact in bilingualism: Phonetic system interactions. Laboratory Phonology, 9, 353–382.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. A. (1980). Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujimura, O. (1962). Analysis of nasal consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34(12), 1865–1875. doi:10.1121/1.1909142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gow, D. W. (2003). Feature parsing: Feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(4), 575–590. doi:10.3758/bf03194584CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosjean, F. (1982). Life with two Languages: An Introduction to Bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. (2011). Cascading activation across levels of representation in children's lexical processing. Journal of Child Language, 38(3), 644–661. Doi: 10.1017/s0305000910000206CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, E. K., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2001). Word segmentation by 8-month-olds: When speech cues count more than statistics. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(4), 548–567. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, P. A. (1988). Underspecification in Phonetics. Phonology, 5(02), 275–292. doi:10.1017/s095267570000230xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T. (2008). Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1493), 979–1000. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurowski, K. M., & Blumstein, S. E. (1993). Acoustic properties for the perception of nasal consonants. In Huffman, M. K. & Krakow, R. A. (Eds.), Nasals, Nasalization, and the Velum (pp. 197-222). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lahiri, A., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1991). The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition, 38, 245–294. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90008-RCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legacy, J., Zesinger, P., Friend, M., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2018). Vocabulary size and speed of word recognition in very young French-English bilinguals: A longitudinal study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(1), 137–149. doi:10.1017/S1366728916000833CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, L., & Kager, R. (2018). Monolingual and bilingual infants’ ability to use non-native tone for word learning deteriorates by the second year After birth. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00117Google ScholarPubMed
Macleod, A. A. N., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (2009). The use of voice onset time by early bilinguals to distinguish homorganic stops in Canadian English and Canadian French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(1), 53–77. doi:10.1017/s0142716408090036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maeda, S. (1993). Acoustics of vowel nasalization and articulatory shift in French nasal vowels. In Huffman, M. K. & Krakow, R. A. (Eds.), Nasals, Nasalization, and the Velum (pp. 147–167). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mahr, T., McMillan, B. T. M., Saffran, J. R., Ellis Weismer, S., & Edwards, J. (2015). Anticipatory coarticulation facilitates word recognition in toddlers. Cognition, 142, 345–350. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMurray, B., Clayards, M. A., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2008). Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(6), 1064–1071. doi:10.3758/pbr.15.6.1064CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition, 86(2), B33–B42. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00157-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paquette-Smith, M., Fecher, N., & Johnson, E. K. (2016). Two-year-olds’ sensitivity to subphonemic mismatch during online spoken word recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(8), 2329–2340. doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1186-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradis, J. (2001). Do bilingual two-year-olds have separate phonological systems? International Journal of Bilingualism, 5(1), 19–38. doi:10.1177/13670069010050010201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelham, S. D., & Abrams, L. (2014). Cognitive advantages and disadvantages in early and late bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 313–325. doi:10.1037/a0035224Google ScholarPubMed
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2002). Word-specific phonetics. In Gussenhoven, C. & Warner, N. (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7 (pp. 101-139). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Porretta, V., Kyröläinen, A.-J., van Rij, J., & Järvikivi, J. (2018). Visual World Paradigm data: From preprocessing to nonlinear time-course analysis. In I. Czarnowski, R. J. Howlett, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Intelligent Decision Technologies 2017, 268–277. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59424-8_25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porretta, V., Tucker, B. V., & Järvikivi, J. (2016). The influence of gradient foreign accentedness and listener experience on word recognition. Journal of Phonetics, 58, 1–21. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2016.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramon-Casas, M., Fennell, C. T., & Bosch, L. (2017). Minimal-pair word learning by bilingual toddlers: the Catalan /e/-/ɛ/ contrast revisited. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(3), 649–656. doi:10.1017/s1366728916001115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramon-Casas, M., Swingley, D., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2009). Vowel categorization during word recognition in bilingual toddlers. Cognitive Psychology, 59(1), 96–121. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigler, H., Farris-Trimble, A., Greiner, L., Walker, J., Tomblin, J. B., & McMurray, B. (2015). The slow developmental time course of real-time spoken word recognition. Developmental Psychology, 51(12), 1690–1703. doi:10.1037/dev0000044CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rost, G. C., & McMurray, B. (2009). Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning. Developmental Science, 12(2), 339–349. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00786.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salverda, A. P., Kleinschmidt, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2014). Immediate effects of anticipatory coarticulation in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 71(1), 145–163. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.11.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sekerina, I. A., & Brooks, P. J. (2007). Eye movements during spoken word recognition in Russian children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98(1), 20–45. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.04.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steriade, D. (1995). Underspecification and markedness. In Goldsmith, J. (Ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory (pp. 114–175). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sundara, M., Polka, L., & Genesee, F. (2006). Language-experience facilitates discrimination of /d-/ in monolingual and bilingual acquisition of English. Cognition, 100(2), 369–388. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swingley, D., Pinto, J. P., & Fernald, A. (1999). Continuous processing in word recognition at 24 months. Cognition, 71(2), 73–108. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00021-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Rij, J., Wieling, M., Baayen, R., & van Rijn, H. (2017). itsdaug: Interpreting Time Series and Autocorrelated Data Using GAMMs. [R package]Google Scholar
Wood, S. N. (2017). Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamuner, T. S., Moore, C., & Desmeules-Trudel, F. (2016). Toddlers’ sensitivity to within-word coarticulation during spoken word recognition: Developmental differences in lexical competition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 152, 136–148. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.07.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed