Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:38:44.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Documenting the acquisition of indigenous languages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2020

Clifton PYE*
Affiliation:
The University of Kansas
*
*Corresponding author: Clifton Pye, University of Kansas - Department of Linguistics, 1541 Lilac Lane, Lawrence, Kansas66045, United States. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

The outstanding property of human language is its diversity, and yet acquisition data is only available for three percent of the world's 6000+ spoken languages. Due to the rapid pace of language loss, it may not be possible to document how children acquire half of the world's indigenous languages in as little as two decades. This loss permanently diminishes the scope of acquisition theory by removing its empirical base. In the face of pervasive language loss, the question of how best to document the language of the last children to acquire indigenous languages assumes critical importance. A collaborative effort by researchers is required to identify the most efficient procedures for documenting children's language, and share them worldwide. This paper makes the case for documenting diversity and outlines steps needed to accomplish this goal.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. V. M. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, J. (1995). The acquisition of stress. In Archibald, J. (Ed.), Phonological acquisition and phonological theory (pp. 81109). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bavin, E., & Stoll, S. (Eds). (2013). The acquisition of ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. (2014). Cross-linguistic comparisons in child language research. Journal of Child Language, 41(1), 2637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernhardt, B. H., & Stemberger, J. P. (1998). Handbook of phonological development: From the perspective of constraint-based nonlinear phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berthiaume, S. (2012). A Phonological Grammar of Northern Pame. SIL ebooks, 37. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Berthiaume, S. (2019). Prosody as seen in the morphological development of Northern Pame (Xi'iuy). DFW Metroplex Linguistics Conference, November 8, 2019, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
Bickel, B., & Nichols, J. (2007). Inflectional morphology. In Shopen, T. (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. 2nd ed., (pp. 169240). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, F. (1911). Introduction. Handbook of the American Indian Languages, 1, 583.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (2011). Linguistic typology and first language acquisition. In Song, J. J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, (pp. 591617). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2001). Shaping meanings for language: universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 475511). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenzinger, M. (Ed.). (2007). Language diversity endangered. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. (1994). The INs and ONs of Tzeltal locative expressions: The semantics of static descriptions of location. Linguistics, 32, 743790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. (1998). Children's first verbs in Tzeltal: Evidence for an early verb category. Linguistics, 36, 713–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. (2001). Learning to talk about motion UP and DOWN in Tzeltal: Is there a language–specific bias for verb learning? In Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 512543). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., Pfeiler, B., de León, L., & Pye, C. (2013). The acquisition of agreement in four Mayan languages. In Bavin, E. and Stoll, S. (Eds.), The acquisition of ergativity (pp. 271305). John Benjamins: Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L. (2017). On how and why languages become endangered. Language, 93(4), e224e233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L., & Belew, A. (Eds.). (2018). Cataloguing the world's endangered languages. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo Carreón, C. (2007). Early acquisition of split intransitive system in Yukatek. In Pfeiler, B. (Ed.), Learning indigenous languages: Child language acquisition in Mesoamerica (pp. 6983). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (2003). First language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1981). Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cook, E.-D. (2006). The patterns of consonantal acquisition and change in Chipewyan (Dëne Sųłiné). International Journal of American Linguistics 72(2), 236263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. (2000). Language death. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. (2014). Editorial. Journal of Child Language, 41, Supplement 1, v–vi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de León, L. (2001). Why Tzotzil (Mayan) children prefer verbs: The role of linguistic and cultural factors over cognitive determinants. In Almgren, M., Barrena, A., Ezeizabarrena, M.-J., Idiazabal, I., & MacWhinney, B. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th conference of the international association for the study of child language (pp. 947969). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
de León, L. (2007). A preliminary view at Ch'ol (Mayan) early lexicon: The role of language and cultural context. In Pfeiler, B. (Ed.), Learning indigenous languages: Child language acquisition in Mesoamerica (pp. 85101). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de López, K. M. J. (2007). Bcuaa quiang – I stepped HEAD it! The acquisition of Zapotec bodypart locatives. In Pfeiler, B. (Ed.), Learning indigenous languages: Child language acquisition in Mesoamerica (pp. 155182). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J., & de Villiers, P. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 267278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demuth, K. (1996a). The prosodic structure of early words. In Morgan, J. L. & Demuth, K. (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (171184). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. (1996b). Collecting spontaneous production data. In McDaniel, D., McKee, C. & Cairns, H. S. (Eds.), Methods for assessing children's syntax (pp. 322). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. (2001). Prosodic constraints on morphological development. In Weissenborn, J. & Höhle, B. (Eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition (pp. 321). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiCanio, C., & Bennett, R. (in press). Prosody in Mesoamerican languages. In Gussenhoven, C. & Chen, A. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language prosody. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dorian, N. C. (2004). Minority and endangered languages. In Bhatia, T. K. & Ritchie, W. C. (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism (pp. 437459). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S., & Haspelmath, M. (Eds.). (2013). The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info, Accessed on 2020-01-14.)Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63, 805855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (Eds). (2019). Ethnologue: Languages of the world. Twenty-second edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International.Google Scholar
Eisenbeiss, S. (2006). Documenting child language. In Austin, P. K. (Ed.), Language documentation and description, Vol. 3 (pp. 106140). London, England: SOAS.Google Scholar
England, N. C. (1983). A grammar of Mam, a Mayan language. The University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
England, N. C. (2003). Mayan language revival and revitalization politics: Linguists and linguistic ideologies. American Anthropologist, 105, 733743. DOI: 10.1525/aa.2003.105.4.733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, N. C. (2007). The influence of Mayan-speaking linguists on the state of Mayan linguistics. In Austin, P. K. & Simpson, A. (Eds), Endangered languages (pp. 93111). Berlin: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
England, N. C., & Martin, L. (2003). Issues in the comparative argument structure analysis in Mayan narratives. In Du Bois, J. W., Kumpf, L. E. & Ashby, W. J. (Eds.), Preferred argument structure (pp. 130155). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fee, E. J. (1995). Segments and syllables in early language acquisition. In Archibald, J. (Ed.), Phonological acquisition and phonological theory (pp. 4361). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fikkert, P. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure (Doctoral dissertation). University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Gehr, S. (2013). Breath of life: Revitalizing California's native languages through archives. San José, CA: San José State University master's thesis. Online: http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/4386.Google Scholar
Gómez López, P. (1998). Factores perceptuales y semánticos en la adquisición de la morfología en huichol. Función, 18, 175204.Google Scholar
Gómez López, P. (2007). Acquisition of referential and relational words in Huichol: From 16 to 24 months of age. In Pfeiler, B. (Ed.), Learning indigenous languages: Child language acquisition in Mesoamerica (pp. 103118). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenoble, L. A., & Whaley, L. J. (Eds). (1998). Endangered languages: Language loss and community response. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinevald, C. (2003). Classifier systems in the context of a typology of nominal classification. In Emmorey, K. (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, (pp. 91110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hale, K. (1966). Kinship reflections in syntax. Word, 22, 318324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, K. (1992). Endangered languages: On endangered languages and the safeguarding of diversity. Language, 68(1), 142.Google Scholar
Hale, K. (1998). On endangered languages and the importance of linguistic diversity. In Grenoble, L. A., & Whaley, L. J. (Eds.), Endangered languages: Language loss and community response (pp. 192216). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, C. (2002). From syntax to discourse: Pronominal clitics, null subjects and infinitives in child language. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2010). How comparative concepts and descriptive linguistic categories are different. Language, 86(3), 663687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2011). The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica, 45(1), 3180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hinton, L. (2001). The use of linguistic archives in language revitalization. In Hinton, L. & Hale, K. (Eds), The green book of language revitalization (pp. 419423). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, N. (2011). Missing subjects in early child language. In de Villiers, J., & Roeper, T. (Eds.), Handbook of generative approaches to language acquisition (pp. 1352). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. (1981). Procedures for the analysis of children's language. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1989). First language acquisition: Method, description and explanation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, B. F., & Nordlinger, R. (2014). Fieldwork and first language acquisition. In Gawne, L. & Vaughan, J. (Eds.), Selected papers from the 44th Conference of the Australian linguistic society, 2013. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/ALS2013Proceedings.Google Scholar
Kelly, B. F., Forshaw, W., Nordlinger, R., & Wigglesworth, G. (2015). Linguistic diversity in first language acquisition research: Moving beyond the challenges. First language, 35(4–5), 286304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, M. E. (1992). The world's languages in crisis. Language, 68(1), 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. (1916). The speech of a Zuñi child. The American Anthropologist, XVIII, 529–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahiri, A. (2001). Metrical patterns. Language Typology and Language Universals, 13, 4767.Google Scholar
Larsen, K. (1949). Huasteco baby talk. El México Antiguo, 7, 295298.Google Scholar
Lieven, E., & Stoll, S. (2013). Early communicative development in two cultures: A comparison of the communicative environments of children from two cultures. Human Development, 56, 178206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lust, B. (2006). Child language: Acquisition and growth. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Snow, C. E. (1985). The child language data exchange system. Journal of Child Language, 12, 271296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McQuown, N. (1955). The indigenous languages of Latin America. American Anthropologist, 57, 501570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, L. (1983). Development of articulatory, phonetic, and phonological capabilities. In Butterworth, B. (Ed.), Language production, vol. 2 (pp. 350). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (1981). Assessing language production in children: Experimental procedures. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. (1987). Observing and analysing natural language: A critical account of sociolinguistic method. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mithun, M. (1989). The acquisition of polysynthesis. Journal of Child Language, 16, 285312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mithun, M. (1998). The significance of diversity in language endangerment and preservation. In Grenoble, L. A. & Whaley, L. J. (Eds.), Endangered languages: Language loss and community response (pp. 163191). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, M. (2014). Morphology: What's in a word? In Genetti, C. (Ed.), How languages work: An introduction to language and linguistics (pp. 7199). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montes Castañeda, F. (2014). Adquisición de la semántica de las raíces léxicas topológicas de contacto y separación: ‘poner(se)’ y ‘quitar(se)’ prendas de vestir en el totonaco de Santa Ana, Chumatlán, Veracrúz. Master's thesis. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social, México.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society of Research in Child Development, 38, no. 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (2014). A matter of meaning: Reflections on forty years of JCL. Journal of Child Language, 41, Supplement 1: 93104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nokony, A. (1978). Word and gesture usage by an Indian child. In Lock, A. (Ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of language (pp. 291307). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nolan, R. (2020). Language barrier: For indigenous people who cross the border, a translation crisis follows. The New Yorker, January 6, 2020 (pp. 26–31).Google Scholar
Pfeiler, B. (2002). Noun and verb acquisition in Yucatec Maya. In Voeikova, M. D. & Dressler, W. U. (Eds.), Pre- and Protomorphology: Early phases of mophological development in nouns and verbs (pp. 7582). Lincom Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 29. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Pfeiler, B. (2003). Early acquisition of the verbal complex in Yucatec Maya. In Bittner, D., Dressler, W. U. & Kilani-Schoch, M. (Eds.), Development of verb inflections on first language acquisition. A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 379399). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pfeiler, B. (2007). Introduction: The view from Mesoamerica. In Pfeiler, B. (Ed.), Learning indigenous languages: Child language acquisition in Mesoamerica (pp. 113). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiler, B., & Pye, C. (2012). The acquisition of pronominal clitics in Teenek Maya (hua). Poster presentation at the 5th Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2012), The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, October 12, 2012.Google Scholar
Port, R., & Leary, A. (2005). Against formal phonology. Language, 81, 927964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, C. (1983). Mayan telegraphese: Intonational determinants of inflectional development in Quiché Mayan. Language, 59, 583604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, C. (1990). The acquisition of ergative languages. Linguistics, 28, 12911330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, C. (2013). A tale of two Mam children: Contact induced language change in Mayan child language. International Journal of American Linguistics, 79 (4), 555575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, C. (2017). The comparative method of language acquisition research. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, C., Ingram, D., & List, H. (1987). A comparison of initial consonant acquisition in English and Quiché. In Nelson, K. and van Kleeck, A. (Eds.), Children's language, vol. 6 (pp. 175190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pye, C., Pfeiler, B., de León, L., Brown, P., & Mateo, P. (2007). Roots or edges?: A comparative study of Mayan children's early verb forms. In Pfeiler, B. (Ed.), Learning indigenous languages: Child language acquisition in Mesoamerica (pp. 1546). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, C., Pfeiler, B., & Mateo Pedro, P. (2013). The acquisition of extended ergativity in Mam, Q'anjob’al and Yucatec. In Bavin, E. & Stoll, S. (Eds.), The acquisition of ergativity, (pp. 307335). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, C., & Pfeiler, B. (2017a). A comparative study of the acquisition of nominative and ergative agreement in European and Mayan languages. In Massam, D., Travis, L. & Coon, J. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity (pp. 665689). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pye, C., Pfeiler, B., & Mateo Pedro, P. (2017b). The acquisition of Mayan languages. In Aissen, J., England, N. & Zavala Maldonado, R. (Eds.), The Mayan languages (pp. 1942). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, C., Pfeiler, B., Mateo Pedro, P., & Stengel, D. (2017c). Analysis of variation in Mayan child phonologies. Lingua, 198, 3852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, C., & Pfeiler, B. (2019). The acquisition of directionals in two Mayan languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2442. [doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02442].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pye, C., Berthiaume, S., & Pfeiler, B. (2020). Northern Pame-Spanish language acquisition in the context of incipient language loss. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(2), 246265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, C., Berthiaume, S., & Pfeiler, B. (In press). The acquisition of noun inflection in Northern Pame (Xi'iuy): Comparing whole word and minimal word accounts. Journal of Child Language.Google Scholar
Ramírez Nava, E. (2005). Adquisición de los prefijos de sujeto y objeto en el nahuatl de la Huasteca Veracruzana. Un estudio de caso de Hueycuatitla, Benito Juárez, Veracruz. MA thesis. México, D.F.: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.Google Scholar
Rescorla, L. A. (1980). Overextension in early language development. Journal of Child Language, 7, 321335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, K., & Avery, P. (1994). Variability in a deterministic model of language acquisition: A theory of segmental elaboration. In Archibald, J. (Ed.), Phonological acquisition and phonological theory (pp. 3364). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Siewierska, A. (2004). Person. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (Ed.). (1967). A field manual for cross-cultural study of the acquisition of communicative competence. Berkeley, CA: Language-Behavior Research Laboratory, University of California.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Introduction: Why study acquisition crosslinguistically? In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 1: The data (pp. 324). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stassen, L. (2011). The problem of cross-linguistic identification. In Song, J. J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology (pp. 9099). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stemberger, J. P., & Chávez–Peón, M. E. (2014). Overgeneralization in the processing of complex forms in Valley Zapotec child language. Semantic considerations of lexical processing. Thematic issue of the mental lexicon, 9(1), 107130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, S. (2016). Studying language acquisition in different linguistic and cultural settings. In Bonvillain, N. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 140158). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stoll, S., & Lieven, E. (2014). Studying language acquisition cross-linguistically. In Winskel, H. & Pradakannaya, P. (Eds.), South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics (pp. 1935). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139084642.004.Google Scholar
Straight, S. H. (1976). The acquisition of Maya phonology: Variation in Yucatec child language. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Stross, B. (1969). Language acquisition by Tenejapa Tzeltal children. Working paper No. 20. Language-Behavior Research Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. (2015). Endangered languages: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, S. G., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Gijn, R., & Zúñiga, F. (2014). Word and the Americanist perspective. Morphology 24 (Special Issue on Word in the Languages of the Americas), 135160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, A. R. (1863). On the physical geography of the Malay archipelago. Journal of the royal geographical society, 33, 217234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. H. (2003). Professor brings Aboriginal languages to life. In MIT News, 22 October 2003.Google Scholar