Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:48:09.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cumulative semantic interference across unrelated responses in school-age children's picture naming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2020

Monique CHAREST  and
Tieghan BAIRD
Monique CHAREST*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Canada
Tieghan BAIRD
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Canada
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, 2-70 Corbett Hall, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2G4. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Naming semantically related images results in progressively slower responses as more images are named. There is considerable documentation in adults of this phenomenon, known as cumulative semantic interference. Few studies have focused on this phenomenon in children. The present research investigated cumulative semantic interference effects in school-aged children. In Study 1, children named a series of contiguous, semantically related pictures. The results revealed no cumulative interference effects. Study 2 utilized an approach more closely aligned with adult methods, incorporating intervening, unrelated items intermixed with semantically related items within a continuous list. Study 2 showed a linear increase in reaction time as a function of ordinal position within semantic sets. These findings demonstrate cumulative semantic interference effects in young, school-aged children that are consistent with experience-driven changes in the connections that underlie lexical access. They invite further investigation of how children's lexical representation and processing are shaped by speaking experiences.

Keywords

cumulative semantic interferencepicture namingchildrenlexical accessvocabulary
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , May 2021 , pp. 499 - 514
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alario, F. X., & del Prado Martín, F. M. (2010). On the origin of the “cumulative semantic inhibition” effect. Memory & Cognition, 38, 57–66. doi:10.3758/MC.38.1.57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belke, E., Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2005). Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A, 58, 667–692. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belke, E., & Stielow, A. (2013). Cumulative and non-cumulative semantic interference in object naming: Evidence from blocked and continuous manipulations of semantic context. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2135–2160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.775318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, D. V. M., Snowling, M. J., Thompson, P. A., Greenhalgh, T., & the CATALISE-2 consortium. (2017). Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58, 1068–1080. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12721CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boelens, H., & La Heij, W. (2017). The development of semantic blocking in children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 35, 310–315. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12178CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booth, J., & Vitkovitch, M. (2008). Perseverant responding in children's picture naming. Journal of Child Language, 35, 235–246. doi: 10.1017/S030500090700832XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Budd, M.-J., Hanley, R., & Griffiths, Y. (2011). Simulating children's retrieval errors in picture-naming: A test of Foygel and Dell's (2000) semantic/phonological model of speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 74–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charest, M. (2017). Cumulative semantic interference in young children's picture naming. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 835–853. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716416000461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, P. S., & Fenson, L. (1996). Lexical development norms for young children. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28(1), 125–127. doi: 10.3758/BF03203646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershkoff-Stowe, L. (2001). The course of children's naming errors in early word learning. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2, 131–155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD0202_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershkoff-Stowe, L. (2002). Object naming, vocabulary growth, and the development of word retrieval abilities. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 665–687. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershkoff-Stowe, L., Connell, B., & Smith, L. (2006). Priming overgeneralizations in two- and four-year-old children. Journal of Child Language, 33, 461–486. doi: 10.1017/S0305000906007562CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Smith, L. B. (1997). A curvilinear trend in naming errors as a function of early vocabulary growth. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 37–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1997.0664CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, D., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Cole-Virtue, J. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 100, 464–482. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, J. W., & Schnur, T. T. (2017). Facilitation and interference in naming: A consequence of the same learning process?. Cognition, 165, 61–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jerger, S., Martin, R. C., & Damian, M. F. (2002). Semantic and phonological influences on picture naming by children and teenagers. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 229–249. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00002-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, R. N., Dale, P. S., Bleses, D., & Fenson, L. (2010). CLEX: A cross-linguistic lexical norms database. Journal of Child Language, 37, 419–428. doi : 10.1017/S0305000909009544CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladányi, E., & Lukács, Á. (2016). Lexical conflict resolution in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 61, 119–130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.04.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucariello, J., Kyratzis, A., & Nelson, K. (1992). Taxonomic knowledge: What kind and when? Child Development, 63, 978–998. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01676.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, C., McDaniel, D., & Garrett, M. F. (2018). Children's performance abilities: language production. In Fernández, E. M. & S, H.. Cairns, (Eds.), The Handbook of Psycholinguistics, First Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 50A(3), 528–559. doi: 10.1080/027249897392017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarrete, E., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2010). The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition. Acta Psychologica, 134, 279–289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). The dark side of incremental learning: a model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition, 114, 227–252. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide [computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.Google Scholar
Schnur, T. T. (2014). The persistence of cumulative semantic interference during naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 27–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnur, T. T., Schwartz, M. F., Brecher, A., & Hodgson, C. (2006). Semantic interference during blocked-cyclic naming: evidence from aphasia. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 199–227. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiley, S. S., & Brown, A. L. (1979). Conceptual preference for thematic or taxonomic relations: A nonmonotonic age trend from preschool to old age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28, 249–257. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(79)90087-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, H., & Munakata, Y. (2013). So many options, so little control: Abstract representations can reduce selection demands to increase children's self-directed flexibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 659–673. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.07.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waxman, S. R., & Namy, L. L. (1997). Challenging the notion of a thematic preference in young children. Developmental Psychology, 33, 555–567. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.33.3.555CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed