Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:42:44.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpretive Approaches to Southeast Asian Languages and Cultures—A Symposium: Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Susan Rogers  and
Richard McGinn
Get access

Abstract

The introduction to the symposium sets out a methodological framework for the apprehension of Southeast Asian rituals, languages, and literary texts so that they are at once open to cross-cultural comparative analysis and recorded in social and symbolic contextual detail. Philosopher Paul Ricoeur's use of the term “interpretation” is central here: he urges students of cultures to combine attention to structural features of language and culture (for example, grammatical patterns) with inquiries into social contextual features (for example, speech usage in real communities). Moving back and forth between the two sorts of analysis allows researchers to bring the insights of the one pole to the investigation of the other; the full hermeneutic process constitutes interpretation. This style of inquiry, a modification of the sort of interpretive social science developed by Geertz and Becker, allows Southeast Asianists to draw on careful ethnography to make crucial “course corrections” in anthropological and linguistic theory building in general.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , August 1985 , pp. 735 - 742
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Becker, A. L. 1979a. “Communication Across Diversity.” In Becker and Yengoyan 1979:1–8.Google Scholar
Becker, A. L. 1979b. “Text-Building, Epistemology, and Aesthetics in Javanese Shadow Theatre.” In Becker and Yengoyan 1979:212–244.Google Scholar
Becker, A. L. 1982. “Modern Philology.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Becker, A. L., and Yengoyan, A., eds. 1979. The Imagination of Reality: Essays in Southeast Asian Coherence Systems. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1972. “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight.” Daedalus 101 (1972): 1–37. Reprinted in Geertz 1973a.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973a. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973b. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” In Geertz 1973a:3–3O.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1976. “From the Native's Point of View: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding.” In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. Basso, Keith and Selby, Henry, pp. 221–237. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1975. What Is a Linguistic Fact? Lisse: Peter De Ridder Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, E. R. 1954. Political Systems of Highland Burma. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leach, E. R. 1982. Social Anthropology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1979. Myth and Meaning. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Mead, Margaret. 1952. Review of Zellig S. Harris, Methods of Structural Linguistics (University Press of Chicago, 1951). International Journal of American Linguistics 18:257–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinow, Paul, and Sullivan, William, eds. 1979. Interpretive Social Science: A Reader. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1976. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1979. “The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as a Text.” In Rabinow and Sullivan 1979:73–102.Google Scholar
Schutz, Noel W. Jr. 1975. On the Autonomy and Comparability of Linguistic and Ethnographic Description. Lisse: Peter De Ridder Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar