Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T08:30:26.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trade Agreements, Competition and the Environment: Gridlock at the Crossroads: Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Greg Pompelli*
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee

Extract

The southern perspective provided in the Seale and Fairchild paper makes this paper especially interesting as an overview of concerns related to the use of trade policies to advance environmental objectives on a global scale. With the exception of their “World Environmental Bank” idea, it is easy for me to agree with most of their points and their underlying premise that the development of trade policies based on environmental priorities represents an effort to link the inaccurate with the unstable.

Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Freeman, O.L.Meeting the Food Needs of the Coming Decade: Agriculture vs. the Environment.Futurist, 24(6): 1520, 1990.Google Scholar
Pomareda, C. and Schmitz, A.. “Agricultural and Trade Policy Reform As Environmental Protection?” Presentation to the Conference on Natural Resources and Environmental Management in an Interdependent World, San José, Costa Rica, January 23, 1992.Google Scholar
Rogoff, K.Can International Monetary Policy Cooperation Be Counterproductive?Journal of International Economics, 18: 199217, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seale, J. Jr., and Fairchild, G.. “Trade Agreements, Competition, and the Environment: Gridlock at the Crossroads.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 26(1): this issue, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar