Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:33:26.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial analysis for political scientists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2021

Jessica Di Salvatore  and
Andrea Ruggeri Open the ORCID record for Andrea Ruggeri [Opens in a new window]
Jessica Di Salvatore*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Andrea Ruggeri
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

How does space matter in our analyses? How can we evaluate diffusion of phenomena or interdependence among units? How biased can our analysis be if we do not consider spatial relationships? All the above questions are critical theoretical and empirical issues for political scientists belonging to several subfields from Electoral Studies to Comparative Politics, and also for International Relations. In this special issue on methods, our paper introduces political scientists to conceptualizing interdependence between units and how to empirically model these interdependencies using spatial regression. First, the paper presents the building blocks of any feature of spatial data (points, polygons, and raster) and the task of georeferencing. Second, the paper discusses what a spatial matrix (W) is, its varieties and the assumptions we make when choosing one. Third, the paper introduces how to investigate spatial clustering through visualizations (e.g. maps) as well as statistical tests (e.g. Moran's index). Fourth and finally, the paper explains how to model spatial relationships that are of substantive interest to some of our research questions. We conclude by inviting researchers to carefully consider space in their analysis and to reflect on the need, or the lack thereof, to use spatial models.

Keywords

connectionsGISinterdependencespatial dataspatial errorspatial models
Type
Research Article
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 51 , Special Issue 2: Capturing Causation: Issues of Research Design in Political Science , July 2021 , pp. 198 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Società Italiana di Scienza Politica.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anselin, L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis 27, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anselin, L (2005) Exploring Spatial Data with GeoDaTM: A Workbook. Center for spatially integrated social science. https://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/~gisteac/fspat/geodaworkbook.pdf, March 2021.Google Scholar
Anselin, L, Le Gallo, J and Jayet, H (2008) Spatial panel econometrics. In The Econometrics of Panel Data. Berlin: Springer, pp. 625–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arjona, A (2019) Subnational units, the locus of choice, and concept formation. In Giraudy Agustina, Moncada Eduardo and Snyder Richard (eds). Inside Countries: Subnational Research in Comparative Politics, 214. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 214–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, N, Gleditsch, KS and Beardsley, K (2006) Space is more than geography: using spatial econometrics in the study of political economy. International Studies Quarterly 50, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bivand, RS, Pebesma, EJ, Gomez-Rubio, V and Pebesma, EJ (2008) Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R. New york: Springer.Google Scholar
Böhmelt, T, Ruggeri, A and Pilster, U (2017) Counterbalancing, spatial dependence, and peer group effects. Political Science Research and Methods 5, 221–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhaug, H and Gleditsch, KS (2008) Contagion or confusion? Why conflicts cluster in space. International Studies Quarterly 52, 215–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, SJ, Hays, JC and Franzese, R (2015) APSA Conference Paper Model Specification and Spatial Interdependence.Google Scholar
Costalli, S and Ruggeri, A (2015a) Forging political entrepreneurs: civil war effects on post-conflict politics in Italy. Political Geography 44, 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costalli, S and Ruggeri, A (2015b) Indignation, ideologies, and armed mobilization: civil war in Italy, 1943–45. International Security 40, 119–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmofal, D (2006) Spatial econometrics and political science. Society for Political Methodology, 1–40. Society for Political Methodology Working Paper Archive: http://polmeth.wustl.edu/workingpapers.php.Google Scholar
Darmofal, D (2015) Spatial Analysis for the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daxecker, U, Di Salvatore, J and Ruggeri, A (2019) Fraud is what people make of it: election fraud, perceived fraud, and protesting in Nigeria. Journal of Conflict Resolution 63, 2098–2127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Salvatore, J (2016) Inherently vulnerable? Ethnic geography and the intensity of violence in the Bosnian civil war. Political Geography 51, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Salvatore, J (2018) Does criminal violence spread? Contagion and counter-contagion mechanisms of piracy. Political Geography 66, 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, K (2012) In data we trust? A comparison of UCDP GED and ACLED conflict events datasets. Cooperation and Conflict 47, 124–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elhorst, JP (2014) Spatial Econometrics – From Cross-Sectional Data to Spatial Panels. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Elhorst, JP and Vega, SH (2013) On Spatial Econometric Models, Spillover Effects, and W. ERSA conference papers ersa13p222, European Regional Science Association.Google Scholar
Ferwerda, J and Miller, NL (2014) Political devolution and resistance to foreign rule: a natural experiment. American Political Science Review 108, 642–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fotheringham, AS and Wong, DWS (1991) The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and planning A 23, 1025–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzese, RJ and Hays, JC (2008) Interdependence in comparative politics: substance, theory, empirics, substance. Comparative Political Studies 41, 742–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, E, Gleditsch, NP, Lujala, P and Rod, JK (2005) Conflict diamonds: a new dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science 22, 257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, KS and Weidmann, NB (2012) Richardson in the information age: geographic information systems and spatial data in international studies. Annual Review of Political Science 15, 461–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, D (2003) Spatial Autocorrelation and Spatial Filtering: Gaining Understanding Through Theory and Scientific Visualization. Berlin: Springer Science & Business.Google Scholar
Harbers, I (2015) Taxation and the unequal reach of the state: mapping state capacity in Ecuador. Governance 28, 373–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbers, I and Ingram, MC (2017) Geo-nested analysis: mixed-methods research with spatially dependent data. Political Analysis, 25, 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, K (2018) Data Visualization: a Practical Introduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kocher, MA and Monteiro, NP (2016) Lines of demarcation: causation, design-based inference, and historical research. Perspectives on Politics 14, 952–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koktsidis, PI (2014) How conflict spreads: opportunity structures and the diffusion of conflict in the republic of Macedonia. Civil Wars 16, 208–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeSage, JP and Pace, RK (2014) Interpreting spatial econometric models. In Handbook of Regional Science. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 1535–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midlarsky, MI, Crenshaw, M and Yoshida, F (1980) Why violence spreads: the contagion of international terrorism. International Studies Quarterly 24, 262–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, E and Plümper, T (2016) W. Political Science Research and Methods 4, 175–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggeri, A, Gizelis, T-I and Dorussen, H (2011) Events data as Bismarck's sausages? Intercoder reliability, coders’ selection, and data quality. International Interactions 37, 340–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayn, JB (2017) Eigenvector spatial filtering and spatial autoregression. In Encyclopedia of GIS. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 511–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobler, WR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic geography 46(Suppl. 1), 234–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollefsen, AF, Strand, H and Buhaug, H (2012) PRIO-GRID: a unified spatial data structure. Journal of Peace Research 49, 363–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toset, HPW, Gleditsch, NP and Hegre, H (2000) Shared rivers and interstate conflict. Political geography 19, 971–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, MD and Gleditsch, KS (2018) Spatial Regression Models, 2nd Edn. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Weidmann, NB and Schutte, S (2017) Using night light emissions for the prediction of local wealth. Journal of Peace Research 54, 125–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimpy, C, Whitten, GD and Williams, L (2020) X marks the spot: unlocking the treasure of spatial-X models. Journal of Politics. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Wu, A-M and Kemp, KK (2019) Global measures of spatial association. In Wilson, JP (ed.), The Geographic Information Science & Technology Body of Knowledge. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers. 10.22224/gistbok/2019.1.12, March 2021.Google Scholar
Zhukov, YM (2012) Roads and the diffusion of insurgent violence: the logistics of conflict in Russia's North Caucasus. Political Geography 31, 144–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar