Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T00:06:35.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Case of AES System and Covenants Not to Compete

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2014

Chana Leib
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Cases
Information
Israel Law Review , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , Spring 2001 , pp. 146 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Shalev, G., “Constitutionalization of Contract Law”, in: Towards a New European Ius Commune: Essays on European, Italian and Israeli Law, In Occasion of 40 Years of the E.U. and 50 Years of the State of Israel (Jerusalem, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1999) 205–235Google Scholar.

2 Yavin Plast v. The National Labor Court, Tony Toama, Techno Gumi 47(iv) P.D. 702.

3 AES System, Bamberger Rosenhiem Inc. v. Moshe Sa'ar, and the State of Israel 54(iii) P.D. 850.

4 In addition, B.R. sued Rephael to return computer equipment that they had lent Rephael and to pay for the time they had used the equipment. Rephael sued B.R. in return to remove the blocking B.R. put on their computer system and to supply equipment they had bought from B.R. but had not received.

5 Contracts (General Part) Law, 5733-1973, 27 L.S.I. 117.