Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:10:01.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antibiosis Mechanism of Resistance to Stem Borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Sorghum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

S. P. Singh  and
A. N. Verma
S. P. Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125004, India
A. N. Verma
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125004, India
Get access

Abstract

The biology of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) was studied on two resistant, IS 2205, IS 5469 and two susceptible, HC 136, ICSV1 sorghum genotypes. Significant differences were observed between resistant and susceptible genotypes in regards to larval mortality in whorl, larval period, larval weight, larval length, per cent pupation, pupal weight, fecundity per female and total life span of this pest. Growth index was also influenced by the resistant genotypes. It has been concluded that high mortality of larvae on resistant lines is due to antibiosis.

The correlations between the characters of the pest biology have been worked out and larval stage was the most important parameter influencing the total pest survival and population build-up in the succeeding generations.

Résumé

La biologie du Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) a èté observée sur deux variètés resistantes (IS 2205, IS 5469) et deux succeptibles (HC 136, ICSV1) du sorgho. Des differences significatives furent observées entre les genotypes resistants et succeptibles en relation avec la mortalité des larves dans le verticille, la periode du developpement, le poids et la longueur des larves, le pourcentage et le poids des chrysalides, la fecondité des femelles et la durée de vie des insectes. L'index de croissance a èté influencé par les genotypes resistants. II a èté conclu que la mortalité elevée des larves sur les souches resistantes est due a l'antibiose. Les correlation entre les charactères de la biologie des insectes ont èté analysés et le stage larvaire fut le plus important parametre qui a influencé la survie des insectes et l'edification des futures generations.

Keywords

Stem borerChilo partellusantibiosisresistancebiologysorghumRongeurs de tigeChilo partellusantibioseresistancebiologiesorgho
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 9 , Issue 5 , October 1988 , pp. 579 - 582
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Jotwani, M. G., Chaudhari, S. and Singh, S. P. (1971) Development of Chilo zonellus (Swinhoe) on three promising resistant varieties and a susceptible hybrid of sorghum. In Investigation on Insect Pests of Sorghum and Millets pp. 147–148. Final Technical Report, Division of Entomology, Indian Agricultural Research Institution, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Jotwani, M. G., Chaudhari, S. and Singh, S. P. (1978) Mechanism of resistance to Chilo partellus Swinhoe in sorghum. Indian J. Ent. 40, 273–276.Google Scholar
Kalode, M. B. and Pant, N. C. (1967) Effect of host plants on the survival, development and behaviour of Chilo partellus (Swin.) under laboratory conditions. Indian J. Ent. 29, 48–57.Google Scholar
Klun, J. A. and Brindley, T. A. (1966) Role of 6-methoxy benzoxazolinone inbred resistance of host plant (maize) to first brood larvae of European corn borer. J. Econ. Ent. 59, 711–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, G. and Sukhani, T. R. (1982) Antibiotic effects of some resistant lines of sorghum on post-larval development of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 52, 127–129.Google Scholar
Painter, R. H. (1951) Insect Resistance in Crop Plants. The Macmillan Company, New York, pp. 520.Google Scholar
Seshu Reddy, K. V. (1985) Integrated approach to the control of sorghum stem borers. Proc. International Sorghum Entomology Workshop, 15–21 July 1984, Texas A&M University College Station, Texas, USA, pp. 205–215.Google Scholar
Singh, S. P. (1986) Screening of forage sorghum genotypes for resistance to shootfly, Atherigona soccata (Rondani) and stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) and to estimate avoidable losses. Ph.D. Thesis submitted to Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India, pp. 135.Google Scholar
Singh, B. U. and Rana, B. S. (1984) Influence of varietal resistance on oviposition and larval development of stalk-borer, Chilo partellus Swin., and its relationship to field resistance in sorghum. Insect Sci. Applic. 5, 286–296.Google Scholar
Srivastava, K. P. (1985) Screening for sorghum stem borer resistance. Proc. International Sorghum Entomology Workshop, 15–21 July, 1984, Texas A&M University College Station, Texas, U.S.A., pp. 189–200.Google Scholar
Swarup, V. and Chaugale, D. S. (1962) A preliminary study on resistance to stem borer, Chilo zonellus (Swin.) infestation on Sorghum vulgare Pers. Curr. Sci. 31, 163–164.Google Scholar
Taneja, S. L. and Leuschner, K. (1985) Methods of rearing, infestation and evaluation for Chilo partellus resistance in sorghum. Proc. International Sorghum Entomology Workshop, 15–21 July 1984, Texas A&M University College Station, Texas, USA, pp. 175–188.Google Scholar
Trehan, K. N. and Butani, D. K. (1949) Notes on the life-history bionomics and control of Chilo zonellus (Swinhoe) in Bombay Province. Indian J. Ent. 11, 47–59.Google Scholar