No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 November 2017
This study grew out of my on-the-job blogging. At both the Charleston School of Law and the J. Rueben Clark Law School, I read every opinion from the state and federal appellate courts with jurisdiction over South Carolina and Utah respectively, summarizing the binding authority and posting those summaries online at the Barrister blog and the Binding the Law blog. This has served as excellent current awareness and bar preparation service to the law school communities and a research tool to the legal community generally.
4 Patrick Meyer, Law Firm Legal Research Requirements for New Attorneys 101 LLJ 297.
5 ALL-SIS Task Force on Identifying Skills and Knowledge for Legal Practice A STUDY OF ATTORNEYS’ LEGAL RESEARCH PRACTICES AND OPINIONS OF NEW ASSOCIATES’ RESEARCH SKILLS at 63–64.
6 US Court of Appeals Judicial Business 2014 available at http://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/us-courts-appeals-judicial-business-2014; Court Statistics Project National Center for State Courts at 10–15 available at http://courtstatistics.org/~/media/Microsites/Files/CSP/EWSC_CSP_2015.ashx.
8 See, for example, Sarah Glassmeyer's study of free and open status of state primary authority with state scores http://www.sarahglassmeyer.com/StateLegalInformation/