Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:04:23.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Management of Ethno-Cultural Diversity in Turkey: Europeanization of Domestic Politics and New Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Ayhan Kaya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Turkey has gone through an enormous process of change in the last decade, especially regarding the political recognition of ethno-cultural and religiously diverse groups. The term “diversity” has become one of the catch words of contemporary political philosophy. Diversity, in its recent forms, whether cultural, political, ethnic, or religious, is a byproduct of globalization. Globalization has made the movements of persons or groups in the ethnoscape easier. It is apparent that the management of diversity has posed a great challenge for nation states as well as for the international and supranational organizations such as the United Nations and the European Union (EU).

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Legal Information , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , Summer 2010 , pp. 214 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the International Association of Law Libraries. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kymlicka, Will. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

2 Id. at 46.Google Scholar

3 Barry, Brian. Culture and Equality. An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000).Google Scholar

4 Id. at 165.Google Scholar

5 Young, Iris Marion. A Critique of Integration as the Remedy for Segregation, in D. Bell and A. Haddour (eds.), City Visions (Harlow: Pearson Education, 2000), 205–218.Google Scholar

6 Id. at 216–217.Google Scholar

7 Id. at 206.Google Scholar

8 For a detailed account of those regulations and laws see Aktar, A., Varlik Vergisi ve Türkle§tirme’ Politikalari, Istanbul: İletişim Yayιinlarιi (2000); Bali, R., Cumhuriyet yillarinda Türkiye Yahudileri: Bir Türkleştirme serüveni (1923–1945), Istanbul: Iletişim Yayinlari (1999); and Yιildιiz, A., Ne mutlu Türküm diyebilene: Türk ulusal kimliğinin etmo-seküler sinirlari (1919–1938), Istanbul: Iletişim Yayιinlarιi (2001).Google Scholar

9 For further information on Turkification policies see Aktar (2000).Google Scholar

10 ‘Muslim nation’ included only the Sunnis, but not the Alevi population in Turkey.Google Scholar

11 Landau, Jacob M. Tekinalp: Bir Türk Yurtseveri (1883–1961). Istanbul: İletişim Yayιinlarιi (1996).Google Scholar

12 See, Yιildιiz, supra at note 8.Google Scholar

13 Yavuz, M. Hakan. “Five Stages of the Construction of Kurdish Nationalism in Turkey,” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, Vol. 7, No. 3 (August 2001): 1–24. See also, Ekinci, Tank Ziya. Avrupa Birliği'nde Azinliklarin Korunmasi Sorunu, Türkiye ve Kürtler. Istanbul: Sümer Yayιincιilιik (2001).Google Scholar

14 Kubicek, Paul. “Turkish Accession to the European Union: Challenges and Opportunities,” World Affairs, Vol. 168, No. 2 (Fall 2005): 67–78.Google Scholar