Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:23:42.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Elephant in the Sales Room: Ivory and the British Antiques Trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2016

Caroline Cox*
Affiliation:
School of Law, Portsmouth Business School, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom; Email: [email protected]

Abstract:

In March 2015, it was reported that His Royal Highness, the Duke of Cambridge would “like to see all the ivory owned by Buckingham Palace destroyed.” In May 2015, the Conservative Party’s manifesto stated that if elected the party would “press for a total ban on ivory sales,” and policy decisions made as part of President Obama’s National Strategy for Combating Wildlife Trafficking saw “all commercial imports of African elephant ivory, including antiques” being prohibited.1 In a changing international environment, the United Kingdom’s antique trade faces a threat to the legitimate sale of pre-1947 worked ivory without the extent of any illegal trade being clear. With only 15 convictions since 1992 for offences relating to the trade in ivory in the English courts, this article examines the two most recent cases, which came to court in 2014.

Type
Case Note
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Neme, L. 2009. Animal Investigators. New York: Scribner Publishers.Google Scholar
Nurse, A. 2012. “Repainting the Thin Green Line: The Enforcement of UK Wildlife Law.” Journal of Criminology: 120, http://www.internetjournalofcriminology.com/Nurse_Repainting_The_Thin_Green_Line_IJC_Oct_2012.pdf (accessed 22 February 2016).Google Scholar
Ogden, J. III. 1977. “The Use and Abuse of Radiocarbon.” Annals of the New York Academy of Science 288: 167–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar