Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:11:24.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III. Cases Before The Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2008

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

1. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide {Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia and Montenegro).

Type
Current Developments
Information
International & Comparative Law Quarterly , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , July 2005 , pp. 794 - 799
Copyright
Copyright © British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ICJ Rep 1993, 3.Google Scholar

2 ibid 325.

3 See C, GrayCase Note (1994) 43 ICLQ 705.Google Scholar

4 ICJ Rep 1993, 29.Google Scholar

5 ICJ Rep 1993 470.Google Scholar

6 ICJ Rep 1995, 80.Google Scholar

7 ICJ Rep 1996, 595. See C, GrayCase Note (1997) 46 ICLQ 688. On 24 Apr 2001 Yugoslavia filed an application for revision of this judgment which the Court declared inadmissible in its judgment of 3 Feb 2003. SeeGoogle ScholarN, TsagouriasCase Note (2004) 53 ICLQ 759.Google Scholar

8 ICJ Rep 1996, 797.Google Scholar

9 ICJ Rep 1997, 243.Google Scholar

10 ICJ Rep 2001, 572.Google Scholar

11 ICJ Rep 1997, 243.Google Scholar

12 ICJ Rep 1998, 3.Google Scholar

13 ICJ Rep 1998 743.Google Scholar

14 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2004/37.Google Scholar

15 ICJ Rep 1997, 7.Google Scholar

16 See PN, OkowaCase Note (1998) 47 ICLQ 688.Google Scholar

17 ICJ Press Communiqué No 98/28.Google Scholar

18 ICJ Press Communiqué No 98/31.Google Scholar

19 ICJ Rep 1999, 1042.Google Scholar

20 ICJ Rep 2000, 146.Google Scholar

21 ICJ Rep 2002, 607.Google Scholar

22 ICJ Rep 1999, 1022.Google Scholar

23 ICJ Rep 2000, 111 and see D, KritsiotisCase Note (2001) 50 ICLQ 662.Google Scholar

24 ICJ Rep 2001, 660.Google Scholar

25 ICJ Rep 2002, 604.Google Scholar

26 ICJ Rep 2003, 3.Google Scholar

27 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2003/24.Google Scholar

28 Press Communiqué No 2003/39.Google Scholar

29 Press Communiqué No 2004/36.Google Scholar

30 ICJ Rep 1999, 1015.Google Scholar

31 ICJ Rep 2000, 3.Google Scholar

32 ICJ Rep 108.Google Scholar

33 ICJ Rep 2002, 610.Google Scholar

34 ICJ Rep 2000, 6.Google Scholar

35 ICJ Rep 2002, 216.Google Scholar

36 ICJ Rep 2001, 565.Google Scholar

37 ICJ Rep 2002, 296.Google Scholar

38 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2004/21.Google Scholar

39 ICJ Rep No 2005/4.Google Scholar

40 Press Communiqué No 2001/34.Google Scholar

41 ICJ Rep 2002, 189.Google Scholar

42 ICJ Rep 2003, 158.Google Scholar

43 ICJ Rep 2002, 613.Google Scholar

44 ICJ Rep 2003, 155.Google Scholar

45 ICJ Rep 2004, 133.Google Scholar

46 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2005/6.Google Scholar

47 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2005/7.Google Scholar

48 ICJ Rep 2002, 219. See C, BrownCase Note (2003) 52 ICLQ 781.Google Scholar

49 ICJ Rep 2002, 299.Google Scholar

50 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2002/37.Google Scholar

51 Press Communiqué No 2003/14.Google Scholar

52 ICJ Rep 2003, 102. See D, TurnsCase Note (2004) 53 ICLQ 775.Google Scholar

53 ICJ Rep 2003, 143.Google Scholar

54 ICJ Rep 2004, 130.Google Scholar

55 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2004/38.Google Scholar

56 Press Communiqué No 2005/1.Google Scholar

57 ICJ Rep 2003, 146.Google Scholar

58 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2005/3.Google Scholar

59 Press Communiqué No 2004/34.Google Scholar