No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 January 2008
The Confiscation of Corporations, Corporate Rights and Corporate Assets and the Conflict of Laws
In the article by Dr. F. A. Mann in the April 1962 issue of the Quarterly (pp. 471–502) a sentence was inadvertently omitted from footnote 2 (p. 472) as follows:
“Moreover, throughout this paper all takings of property by a State are treated as ‘confiscations,’ though not all of them were in fact confiscations.”
Reception and Rejection of English Law in Israel
In the article by Dr. U. Tadin in the January 1962 issue of the Quarterly (pp. 59–72), in the fifth line of the first complete paragraph on page 70, the word “affirmatively” should be replaced by the word “negatively.”
Ghana: The Criminal Code, 1960
In the note by James S. Read in the January 1962 issue of the Quarterly, at p. 279 it was stated that the Criminal Code of Ghana had been amended by the deletion of sections 262–265, thus abolishing the crime of bigamy and related offences. In fact the Criminal Code (Amendment) Bill, which was introduced with the intention of effecting this amendment, was not in fact passed by the National Assembly. The crimes indicated are therefore still part of the law of Ghana. The author apologises for the error which was due to misinformation.