Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T10:02:38.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections in Icus: Is Postdischarge Surveillance Indispensable?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Christine Geffers ,
Petra Gastmeier ,
Helga Bräuer ,
Franz Daschner  and
Henning Rüden
Christine Geffers*
Affiliation:
Institute for Hygiene, Free University of Berlin, Germany German National Reference Center for Hospital Hygiene, Berlin, Germany
Petra Gastmeier
Affiliation:
Institute for Hygiene, Free University of Berlin, Germany German National Reference Center for Hospital Hygiene, Berlin, Germany
Helga Bräuer
Affiliation:
Institute for Hygiene, Free University of Berlin, Germany German National Reference Center for Hospital Hygiene, Berlin, Germany
Franz Daschner
Affiliation:
Institute for Environmental Medicine and Hospital Hygiene, Albert-Ludwigs-University at Freiburg, Germany German National Reference Center for Hospital Hygiene, Berlin, Germany
Henning Rüden
Affiliation:
Institute for Hygiene, Free University of Berlin, Germany German National Reference Center for Hospital Hygiene, Berlin, Germany
*
Zentralbereich Krankenhaushygiene, Charitè, Heubnerweg 6 (Haus II), 14059 Berlin, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To determine how many infections are missed if the postdischarge surveillance (PDS) follow-up of intensive care unit (ICU) patients that is required by the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System method is not done.

Design:

ICU patients were followed up and surveillance results with PDS (gold standard) and without PDS were compared.

Setting:

Surgical or interdisciplinary ICUs in eight German acute-care hospitals.

Patients:

All 1,857 patients within a 6-month period in the participating ICUs (a total of 9,129 ICU-patient–days).

Results:

Without PDS, 45 urinary tract infections (UTIs) were diagnosed, compared with 53 with PDS; thus, 15% of the UTIs were missed if no postdischarge follow-up was performed. Three nosocomial pneumonias (4%) and one bloodstream infection (8%) also were missed if surveillance was carried out without PDS. A total of 198 nosocomial infections (NIs) were recorded with PDS, compared to 175 NIs without PDS. Approximately 12% of all ICU-associated NIs were missed if no follow-up was done.

Conclusions:

Since it is very time-consuming to follow patients after their transfer from the ICU, we do not perform a postdischarge follow-up of patients in the course of routine surveillance.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , March 2001 , pp. 157 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Geffers, C, Koch, J, Sohr, D, Nassauer, A, Daschner, F, Ruden, H, et al. Establishment of a national database for ICU-associated infections. First results from the “Krankenhaus-Infections-Surveillance-System” (KISS). Anaesthesist 2000;49:732–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Emori, TG, Culver, DH, Horan, TC, Jarvis, WR, White, JW, Olson, DR, et al. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS): description of surveillance methods. Am J Infect Control 1991;19:19–35.Google Scholar
3. Horan, TC, Emori, TG. Definitions of key terms used in the NNIS System. Am J Infect Control 1997;25:112–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988 [published erratum appears in Am J Infect Control 1988 Aug;16:177]. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128–140.Google Scholar
5. Gastmeier, P, Geffers, C, Daschner, F, Ruden, H. Diagnostic training for the surveillance of nosocomial infections: what is possible and significant? Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed 1998;201:153–166.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WR. Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:247–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Ferraz, EM, Ferraz, AA, Coelho, HS, Pereira Viana, VP, Sobral, SM, Vasconcelos, MD, et al. Postdischarge surveillance for nosocomial wound infection: does judicious monitoring find cases? Am J Infect Control 1995;23:290–294.Google Scholar
8. Sands, K, Vineyard, G, Platt, R. Surgical site infections occurring after hospital discharge. J Infect Dis 1996;173:963–970.Google Scholar
9. Weigelt, JA, Dryer, D, Haley, RW. The necessity and efficiency of wound surveillance after discharge. Arch Surg 1992;127:77–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Cruse, PJ, Foord, R. A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds. Arch Surg 1973;107:206–210.Google Scholar
11. Lee, JT. Making surgical care better: hard work, small gains. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:6–8.Google Scholar
12. Olson, MM, Lee, JT Jr Continuous, 10-year wound infection surveillance. Results, advantages, and unanswered questions. Arch Surg 1990;125:794–803.Google Scholar
13. Burns, SJ, Dippe, SE. Postoperative wound infections detected during hospitalisation and after discharge in a community hospital. Am J Infect Control 1982;10:60–65.Google Scholar
14. Polk, BF, Tager, IB, Shapiro, M, Goren-White, B, Goldstein, P, Schoenbaum, SC. Randomised clinical trial of perioperative cefazolin in preventing infection after hysterectomy. Lancet 1980;1:437–440.Google Scholar
15. Salem, RJ, Johnson, J, Devitt, P. Short term metronidazole therapy contrasted with povidone-iodine spray in the prevention of wound infection after appendicectomy. Br J Surg 1979;66:430–431.Google Scholar