Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:23:56.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Infection Prevention Time Required for Construction and Design at a Large Tertiary-Care Hospital, 2019

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2020

Angie Dains
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics
Michael Edmond
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Daniel Diekema
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
Stephanie Holley
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Hospital & Clinics
Oluchi Abosi
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics Holly Meacham, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics
Mary Kukla
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Healthcare
Kyle Jenn
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics
Andy Kuse
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics
Robert Miller
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics
Luke Leiden
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics
Jorge Salinas
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background: Including infection preventionists (IPs) in hospital design, construction, and renovation projects is important. According to the Joint Commission, “Infection control oversights during building design or renovations commonly result in regulatory problems, millions lost and even patient deaths.” We evaluated the number of active major construction projects at our 800-bed hospital with 6.0 IP FTEs and the IP time required for oversight. Methods: We reviewed construction records from October 2018 through October 2019. We classified projects as active if any construction occurred during the study period. We describe the types of projects: inpatient, outpatient, non–patient care, and the potential impact to patient health through infection control risk assessments (ICRA). ICRAs were classified as class I (non–patient-care area and minimal construction activity), class II (patients are not likely to be in the area and work is small scale), class III (patient care area and work requires demolition that generates dust), and class IV (any area requiring environmental precautions). We calculated the time spent visiting construction sites and in design meetings. Results: During October 2018–October 2019, there were 51 active construction projects with an average of 15 active sites per week. These sites included a wide range of projects from a new bone marrow transplant unit, labor and delivery expansion and renovation, space conversion to an inpatient unit to a project for multiple air handler replacements. All 51 projects were classified as class III or class IV. We visited, on average, 4 construction sites each week for 30 minutes per site, leaving 11 sites unobserved due to time constraints. We spent an average of 120 minutes weekly, but 450 minutes would have been required to observe all 15 sites. Yearly, the required hours to observe these active construction sites once weekly would be 390 hours. In addition to the observational hours, 124 hours were spent in design meetings alone, not considering the preparation time and follow-up required for these meetings. Conclusions: In a large academic medical center, IPs had time available to visit only a quarter of active projects on an ongoing basis. Increasing dedicated IP time in construction projects is essential to mitigating infection control risks in large hospitals.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Type
Top Rated Posters Presentations
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.