Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T23:42:54.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of a Single Plain Finger Ring on the Bacterial Load on the Hands of Healthcare Workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Mette Fagernes ,
Egil Lingaas  and
Per Bjark
Mette Fagernes*
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Vestfold Hospital, Tønsberg, Norway
Egil Lingaas
Affiliation:
Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet, Department of Infection Prevention, Oslo, Norway
Per Bjark
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Prevention, Vestfold Hospital, Tønsberg, Norway
*
Sykehuset i Vestfold, Klinikk Medisin, Postboks 2168, Postterminalen, N-3103 Tønsberg, Norway ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

To investigate the impact of a single plain finger ring on the number and types of bacteria on the hands of healthcare workers (HCWs).

Design.

Nonequivalent control groups, posttest only (preexperimental).

Methods.

A total of 121 HCWs wearing 1 plain ring and 113 HCWs wearing no rings had both hands sampled by the “glove juice” technique. Quantitative culture of the samples was performed and microorganisms were identified.

Setting.

Two Norwegian acute care hospitals.

Participants.

A total of 234 HCWs who had physical contact with patients.

Results.

Total bacterial counts did not differ when hands with rings and hands without rings were compared, both according to nonpaired analysis (which compared the ring-bearing hands of ring-wearing HCWs to the hands of HCWs who did not wear rings [P = .661]) and according to paired analysis (which compared the ring-bearing and ring-free hands of ring-wearing HCWs [P = .071]). Staphylococcus aureus was recovered from 18.6% of the hands sampled, belonging to 26.9% of the HCWs, but neither paired nor nonpaired analysis showed any association with ring wearing. Gram-negative bacteria were recovered from 20.3% of the hands sampled, belonging to 28.6% of the HCWs. Ring-wearing HCWs were significantly more likely to be carriers of Enterobacteriaceae (P = .006), but paired comparison of the ring-bearing and ring-free hands of these HCWs did not show significant differences (P = .180). Carriage of nonfermentative gram-negative rods did not differ between the 2 groups, by either paired or nonpaired analysis.

Conclusions.

Wearing a single plain finger ring did not increase the total bacterial load on the hands, nor was it associated with an increased rate of carriage of S. aureus or nonfermentative gram-negative rods. However, plain rings were associated with an increased rate of Enterobacteriaceae carriage.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 28 , Issue 10 , October 2007 , pp. 1191 - 1195
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Athar, MA, Stafford, L, Woofliff, JS. Bacterial population of ring and control fingers in health care workers. Infect Control Can 1989;4:8-9-, 11–12.Google Scholar
2. Bartlett, GE, Pollard, TC, Bowker, KE, Bannister, GC. Effect of jewellery on surface bacterial counts of operating theatres. J Hosp Infect 2002;52:68–70.Google Scholar
3. Field, EA, McGowan, P, Pearce, PK, Martin, MV. Rings and watches: should they be removed prior to operative dental procedures? J Dent 1996;24:65–69.Google Scholar
4. Hoffman, PN, Cooke, EM, McCarville, MR, Emmerson, AM. Microorganisms isolated from skin under wedding rings worn by hospital staff. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985;290:206–207.Google Scholar
5. Jacobson, G, Thiele, JE, McCune, JH, Farrell, LD. Handwashing: ring-wearing and number of microorganisms. Nurs Res 1985;34:186–188.Google Scholar
6. Kristiansen, M, Laukvik, G, Wiberg, K, Ovrebotten, IM. Har vi et profesjonelt forhold til sykehushygiene? Sykepleien 1989;77:16–20.Google Scholar
7. Lowbury, EJL, Blowers, R, Cunliffe, AC, et al. Aseptic methods in the operating suite. Lancet 1968;1:705–709.Google Scholar
8. Nicholson-Pegg, A. The wearing of wedding rings in the operating department. NATNEWS 1982;19:19–25.Google Scholar
9. Trick, WE, Vernon, MO, Hayes, RA, et al. Impact of ring wearing on hand contamination and comparison of hand hygiene agents in a hospital. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:1383–1390.Google Scholar
10. Salisbury, DM, Hutfilz, P, Treen, LM, Bollin, GE, Gautam, S. The effect of rings on microbial load of health care workers' hands. Am J Infect Control 1997;25:24–27.Google Scholar
11. Waterman, TR, Smeak, DD, Kowalski, J, Hade, EM. Comparison of bacterial counts in glove juice of surgeons wearing smooth band rings versus those without rings. Am J Infect Control 2006;34:421–425.Google Scholar
12. Boyce, JM, Pittet, D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:S3–40.Google Scholar
13. Fagernes, M. Ringbruk i sykepleiepraksis. Norsk tidsskrift for sykepleie-forskning 2000;2:160–169.Google Scholar
14. Fagernes, M, Nord, R. A study of microbial load of different types of finger rings worn by healthcare personnel. Vård i Norden In press.Google Scholar
15. European Committee for Standardization. EN 1499 Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics—hygienic handwash—test methods and requirements (phase 2/step 2). Brussels: European Committee for Standardization;1997.Google Scholar
16. Aly, R, Maibach, HI. Comparative study on the antimicrobial effect of 0.5% Chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol on the normal flora of hands. Appl Environ Microbiol 1979;37:610–613.Google Scholar
17. Cremieux, A, Reverdy, ME, Pons, JL, et al. Standardized method for evaluation of hand disinfection by surgical scrub formulations. Appl Environ Microbiol 1989;55:2944–2948.Google Scholar
18. Larson, E, Aiello, A, Lee, LV, la-Latta, P, Gomez-Duarte, C, Lin, S. Short-and long-term effects of handwashing with antimicrobial or plain soap in the community. J Community Health 2003;28:139–150.Google Scholar
19. Larson, EL, Strom, MS, Evans, CA. Analysis of three variables in sampling solutions used to assay bacteria of hands: type of solution, use of antiseptic neutralizes, and solution temperature. J Clin Microbiol 1980;12:355–360.Google Scholar
20. Larson, EL, Eke, PI, Laughon, BE. Efficacy of alcohol-based hand rinses under frequent-use conditions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1986;30:542–544.Google Scholar
21. Larson, EL, Laughon, BE. Comparison of four antiseptic products containing Chlorhexidine gluconate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987;31:1572–1574.Google Scholar
22. Larson, EL, Hughes, CA, Pyrek, JD, Sparks, SM, Cagatay, EU, Bartkus, JM. Changes in bacterial flora associated with skin damage on hands of health care personnel. Am J Infect Control 1998;26:513–521.Google Scholar
23. Larson, EL, Aiello, AE, Heilman, JM, et al. Comparison of different regimens for surgical hand preparation. AORN J 2001;73:412-418, 420.Google Scholar
24. Spradlin, CT. Bacterial abundance on hands and its implications for clinical trials of surgical scrubs. J Clin Microbiol 1980;11:389–393.Google Scholar
25. Tvedt, C. Håndhygiene. Hovedoppgave i helsefag. Oslo: University of Oslo;2001.Google Scholar
26. Reybrouck, G. Role of the hands in the spread of nosocomial infections 1. J Hosp Infect 1983;4:103–110.Google Scholar
27. McBryde, ES, Bradley, LC, Whitby, M, McElwain, DL. An investigation of contact transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . J Hosp Infect 2004;58:104–108.Google Scholar
28. Casewell, M, Phillips, I. Hands as route of transmission for Klebsiella species. Br Med J 1977;2:1315–1317.Google Scholar
29. Waters, V, Larson, E, Wu, F, et al. Molecular epidemiology of gram-negative bacilli from infected neonates and healthcare workers' hands in neonatal intensive care units. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:1682–1687.Google Scholar
30. Wongworawat, MD, Jones, SG. Influence of rings on the efficacy of hand sanitization and residual bacterial contamination. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:351–353.Google Scholar
31. Rodriguez-Bano, J, Paterson, DL. A change in the epidemiology of infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing organisms. Clin Infect Dis 2006;42:935–937.Google Scholar
32. Ben-Ami, R, Schwaber, MJ, Navon-Venezia, S, et al. Influx of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae into the hospital. Clin Infect Dis 2006;42:925–934.Google Scholar
33. Gunale, A, von, BH, Wendt, C. Survival of cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae on fingers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:974–977.Google Scholar