Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T23:59:58.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“CDC Says …”: The Case of IV Tubing Replacement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Charles S. Bryan
Charles S. Bryan*
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina School of Medicine and Richland Memorial Hospital, Columbia, South Carolina
*
Richland Memorial Hospital, ACC 2, Columbia, SC 29203
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Sections
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 8 , Issue 6 , June 1987 , pp. 255 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Buxton, AE, Highsmith, AK, Garner, JS, et al: Contamination of intravenous infusion fluid. Effects of changing administration sets. Ann Intern Med 1979; 90:764–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Band, JD, Maki, DG: Safety of changing intravenous delivery systems at longer than 24 hour intervals. Ann Intern Med 1979; 90:173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Simmons, BP: CDC guidelines for the prevention and control of nosocomial infections. Guideline for prevention of intravascular infections. Am J Infect Control 1983; 11:183–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Josephson, A, Gombert, ME, Sierra, MF, et al: The relationship between intravenous fluid contamination and the frequency of tubing replacement. Infect Control 1985; 6:367–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Maki, DG, Botticelli, J, Leroy, M: Prospective study of replacing IV administration sets at 48-hr vs. 72-hr intervals. Presented at the 26th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 28-October 1, 1986, New Orleans, Louisiana (abstract 1042).Google Scholar
6.Snydman, DR, Donnelly-Reidy, M, Perry, LK, et al: Intravenous tubing containing burettes can be safely changed at 72 hour intervals. Infect Control 1987; 8:113–116.Google Scholar