Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T18:47:04.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

All-inclusive Concurrent Antibiotic Usage Review: A Way to Reduce Misuse Without Formal Controls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Herbert S. Heineman  and
Valerie S. Watt
Herbert S. Heineman*
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control, Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Misericordia Division, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Valerie S. Watt
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control, Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Misericordia Division, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
*
Public Health Laboratory, 500 South Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19146
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During an 11-week period, all antibiotic usage on a 113-bed medical teaching service was reviewed concurrently in weekly sessions between house staff and a review team. Recommendations for change, based on accepted criteria, were communicated by the house officer to the attending physician. In one-half of the patients no change was suggested; in one-third, a recommended change was made; and in only one-sixth was a recommendation not followed. Cost savings were conservatively estimated to approach $10,000 in this pilot study; this extrapolates to almost $300,000 per year for the 714-bed medical center, or more than 18% of the antibiotic expenditures.

This program achieves its objective in a nonthreatening, noncontrolling manner, provides continuing education, and contributes to improved patient care.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , March 1986 , pp. 168 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Kunin, CM, Evaluation of antibiotic usage: A comprehensive look at alternative approaches. Rev Infect Dis 1981;3:745–753.Google Scholar
2.Jones, SR, Barks, J, Bretton, T, et al: The effect of an educational program upon hospital antibiotic use. Am J Med Sci 1977;273:79–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Gilbert, DN, Jackson, J, Effect of an education program on the proper use of gentamicin in a community hospital. Clinical Research 1973;24:112A.Google Scholar
4.Schaffner, W, Ray, WA, Federspiel, CF, Miller, WO, Improving antibiotic prescribing in office practice. A controlled trial of three educational methods. JAMA 1983;250:1728–1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Seligman, SJ: Reduction in antibiotic costs by restricting use of an oral cephalosporin. Am J Med 1981;71:941–944.Google Scholar
6.Craig, WA, Uman, SJ, Shaw, WR, et al: Hospital use of antimicrobial drugs: Survey at 19 hospitals and results of antimicrobial control program. Ann Intern Med 1978;89:793–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.McGowan, JE jr, Finland, M, Usage of antibiotics in a general hospital: Effect of requiring justification. J Infect Dis 1974;130:165–168.Google Scholar
8.Veterans Administration Ad Hoc Interdisciplinary Advisory Committee on Antimicrobial Drug Usage. JAMA 1977;237:1001-1008, 1134-1137, 1241-1245, 1366-1369, 1481-1484, 1605-1608, 1723-1725, 1859-1860, 1967–1970.Google Scholar