Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:50:06.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P01-69 - Long-term Asenapine Treatment for Bipolar Disorder: a Double-blind 40-week Extension Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

R. McIntyre
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, USA
M. Cohen
Affiliation:
Schering Corp., a Division of Merck & Co., Summit, NJ, USA
J. Zhao
Affiliation:
Schering Corp., a Division of Merck & Co., Summit, NJ, USA
L. Alphs
Affiliation:
Employed at Pfizer Inc. at the time this research was conducted, New York, NY, USA
T. Macek
Affiliation:
Employed at Pfizer Inc. at the time this research was conducted, New York, NY, USA
A. Szegedi
Affiliation:
Schering Corp., a Division of Merck & Co., Summit, NJ, USA
J. Panagides
Affiliation:
Schering Corp., a Division of Merck & Co., Summit, NJ, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives

Asenapine is indicated in adults for acute treatment of schizophrenia and manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder with or without psychotic features. We report the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of asenapine in patients with bipolar I disorder completing up to 52 weeks of treatment.

Methods

Patients completing either of two 3-week efficacy trials and a 9-week double-blind extension were eligible for this 40-week double-blind extension. Patients in the 3-week trials were randomized to flexible-dose asenapine (5 or 10 mg BID), placebo, or olanzapine (5-20 mg QD; included for assay sensitivity only). Patients entering the extension continued their preestablished treatment; those originally randomized to placebo received flexible-dose asenapine (placebo/asenapine, 5 or 10 mg BID). Safety and tolerability endpoints included adverse events (AEs), extrapyramidal symptoms, laboratory values, and anthropometric measures. Efficacy was measured as the change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score from 3-week trial baseline to week 52; the placebo/asenapine group was included in the safety analyses.

Results

Incidence of treatment-emergent AEs was 71.9%, 86.1%, and 79.4% with placebo/asenapine, asenapine, and olanzapine, respectively. The most frequent AEs included headache and somnolence (placebo/asenapine); insomnia, sedation, and depression (asenapine); and weight gain, somnolence, and sedation (olanzapine). Mean ± SD changes in YMRS score at week 52 among observed cases in the intent-to-treat population were -28.6±8.1 for asenapine and -28.2±6.8 for olanzapine.

Conclusions

In this 52-week study, asenapine was well tolerated and long-term maintenance of efficacy was supported in patients initially presenting with bipolar mania.

Type
Affective disorders / Unipolar depression / Bipolar disorder
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2010
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.