Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:21:57.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A more Sophisticated Understanding of the Politics of Precaution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

David Vogel
David Vogel*
Affiliation:
Haas School of Business and in the Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 321 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Vogel, David, The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Wiener, Jonathan B., Rogers, Michael D., Hammitt, James K., and Sand, Peter H. (eds), The Reality of Precaution: Comparing Risk Regulation in the United States and Europe (Washington, D.C. and London: RFF Press/Earthscan/Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar

3 Rose-Ackerman, Susan, “Precaution, Proportionality, and Cost/Benefit Analysis: False Analogies”, European Journal of Risk Regulation (2013), this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Ibid.

5 Ibid.

6 Burgess, Adam, “Missing the Wood for the Trees”, European Journal of Risk Regulation (2013), this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Ibid.

8 Ibid.

9 Ibid.

10 Ibid.

11 Ibid.

12 Ibid.

13 Majone, Giandomenico, “Political Institutions and the Principle of Precaution”, in Wiener, Jonathan B., Rogers, Michael D., Hammitt, James K., and Sand, Peter H. (eds), The Reality of Precaution: Comparing Risk Regulation in the United States and Europe (Washington, D.C. and London: RFF Press/Earthscan/Routledge, 2011), pp. 411–433.Google Scholar

14 Burgess, “Missing the Wood for the Trees”, supra note 4.

15 Majone, “Political Institutions and the Principle of Precaution”, supra note 11.

16 Winn, Jane K., “Precautionary Schemes”, European Journal of Risk Regulation (2013), this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Ibid.

18 Weimer, Maria, “‘It's the Politics, Stupid’, Or is the Reality more Complex?”, European Journal of Risk Regulation (2013), this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Ibid.

20 Bill Durodié, “Precautionary Tales – Missing the Problem and Its Cause”, European Journal of Risk Regulation, this issue.

21 Ibid.

22 Ibid.

23 Ibid.

24 Ibid.

25 Ibid.

26 Weimer, “It's the Politics, Stupid”, supra note 16. Professor at the Haas School of Business and in the Department of Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley.