Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T06:01:07.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Concrete Review as Indirect Constitutional Complaint in French Constitutional Law: A Comparative Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2010

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1958: a priori review of parliamentary legislation to keep Parliament within its limited legislative competences – 2008: a posteriori review to protect citizens' rights and freedoms – Varieties of concrete review – Originality of the new French procedure – An indirect constitutional complaint: raised by a litigating party, transmitted by an ordinary court and decided by the Constitutional Council – Obstacle to transmission: declaration of conformity in the motives of an earlier decision by Constitutional Council – Conceptual, logical and legal reasons for a strict distinction between normative content and justificatory discourse in judgments – Setting on par of motives and operative part transforms French legal system into a specific form of common law and weakens the Rule of Law

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press and the Authors 2010