Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:04:33.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FREEDOM UNDER AN INDIFFERENT DICTATOR: INTENTIONALITY AND RESPONSIBILITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2016

Frank Hindriks
Frank Hindriks*
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, Faculty of Philosophy, Oude Boteringestraat 52, 9712GL Groningen, the Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]. URL: http://www.rug.nl/staff/f.a.hindriks/.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Freedom is often analysed in terms of the absence of intentionally imposed constraints. I defend the alternative view on which the relevant constraints are those for which some agent can be held morally responsible. I argue that this best captures the relation between freedom and respect. Berlin (1969) correctly points out that intentional restrictions exhibit ill will and hence are disrespectful. However, the same holds, I argue, for restrictions that are due to indifference. Berlin also observed that it would be counterintuitive if an agent could increase her freedom by changing her preferences. I criticize the argument that Dowding and Van Hees (2007, 2008) present according to which this observation counts in favour of explicating freedom in terms of intentionality.

Keywords

freedomindifferenceintentional actionmoral responsibility
Type
Articles
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 25 - 41
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, F. 1986. Intention and intentional action: the simple view. Mind and Language 1: 281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arpaly, N. 2002. Moral worth. Journal of Philosophy 99: 223–245.Google Scholar
Benn, S. I. 1975. Freedom, autonomy, and the concept of a person. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 76: 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benn, S. I. 1988. A Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. 1981. Morality and consequences. In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 2, ed. McMurrin, S., 45–116. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bratman, M. 1987. Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, I. 1999. A Measure of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, I. 2008. How are power and unfreedom related? Republicanism and Political Theory, ed. Laborde, C. and Mayoner, J., 58–82. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carter, I. and Kramer, M.. 2008. How changes in one's preferences can affect one's freedom (and how they cannot): a reply to Dowding and Van Hees. Economics and Philosophy 24: 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bruin, B. 2009. Liberal and republican freedom. Journal of Political Philosophy 17: 418–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowding, K. and van Hees, M.. 2007. Counterfactual success and negative freedom. Economics and Philosophy 23: 141–162.Google Scholar
Dowding, K. and van Hees, M.. 2008. Counterfactual success again: response to Carter and Kramer. Economics and Philosophy 24: 97–103.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. 1990. Intention, Agency and Criminal Liability: Philosophy of Action and the Criminal Law. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Enç, B. 2003. How We Act: Causes, Reasons, and Intentions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, G. 1976. Practical reasoning. Review of Metaphysics 29: 431–463.Google Scholar
Hindriks, F. 2008. Intentional action and the praise-blame asymmetry. Philosophical Quarterly 58: 630–641.Google Scholar
Hindriks, F. 2009. Freedom and unanticipated consequences. Homo Oeconomicus 26: 235–247.Google Scholar
Holton, R. 2010. Norms and the Knobe effect. Analysis 70: 417–424.Google Scholar
Knobe, J. 2003. Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis 63: 190–194.Google Scholar
Knobe, J. 2010. Person as scientist, person as moralist. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33: 315–365.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. 2003. The Quality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. 1992. Social freedom and the test of moral responsibility. Ethics 103: 104–116.Google Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. 1996. Social Freedom. The Responsibility View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lanteri, A. 2009. Judgments of intentionality and moral worth. Philosophical Quarterly 59: 713–720.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. 1978. Neither intentional nor unintentional. Analysis 38: 117–118.Google Scholar
Malle, B. F. and Nelson, S. E.. 2003. Judging mens rea: the tension between folk concepts and legal concepts of intentionality. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 21: 563–580.Google Scholar
Miller, D. 1983. Constraints on freedom. Ethics 94: 66–86.Google Scholar
Morriss, P. 2002. Power: A Philosophical Analysis, Second Edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Morriss, P. 2012. What is freedom if not power? Theoria 59: 1–25.Google Scholar
Moya, C. J. 1991. The Philosophy of Action: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Nadelhoffer, T. 2004. Praise, side effects, and intentional action. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 24: 196–213.Google Scholar
Nado, J. 2008. Effects of moral cognition on judgments of intentionality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59: 709–731.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 1997. Republicanism . A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 2001. A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 2012. On the People's Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitcher, G. 1970. In intending and side effects. Journal of Philosophy 67: 659–668.Google Scholar
Quinn, W.S. 1989. Actions, intentions, and consequences: the doctrine of double effect. Philosophy and Public Affairs 18: 334–351.Google Scholar
Scaiffe, R. and Webber, J.. 2013. Intentional side-effects of action. Journal of Moral Philosophy 10: 179–203.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. 2008. Moral Dimensions. Permissibility, Meaning, and Blame. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sripada, C. 2010. The deep self model and asymmetries in folk judgments about intentional action. Philosophical Studies 151: 159–176.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 2003. Opportunity as space for individuality: its value and the impossibility of measuring it. Ethics 113: 783–809.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. J. 1994. Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 2005. From freedom to liberty: the construction of a political value. In In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, 75–96. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar