Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T21:36:22.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Philosophy for the Science of Well-Being, Anna Alexandrova. Oxford University Press, 2017, xlv + 196 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2019

Leah McClimans Open the ORCID record for Leah McClimans [Opens in a new window]
Leah McClimans*
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina and University College Cork, College Rd, University College, Cork T12 K8AF, Ireland. Email: [email protected]. URL: https://sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/artsandsciences/our-people/faculty-staff/mcclimans_leah.php.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , July 2019 , pp. 347 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Biddle, J. B. and Kukla, R. 2017. The geography of epistemic risk. In Exploring Risk: Case Studies of Values in Science, ed. Elliott, K. E. and Richards, T., 215–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cano, S. J. and Hobart, J. C. 2011. The problem with health measurement. Patient Preference and Adherence 5: 279–290.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N., Shomar, T. and Suarez, M.. 1995. The tool box of science: tools for the building of models with a superconductivity example. In Theories and Models in Scientific Processes, ed. Herfel, W. E., Krajewski, W., Niiniluoto, I. and Wojcicki, R., 137–149. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Giuntoli, G., Huges, S., Karban, K. and South, J.. 2015. Towards a middle-range theory of mental health and well-being effects of employment transitions: findings from a qualitative study on unemployment during the 2009–2010 economic recession. Health 19: 389–412.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. 2015. Valuing Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jeevan, R., Browne, J. P., Gulliver-Clarke, C., Pereira, J., Caddy, C. M., van der Meulen, J. H. P. and Cromwell, D. A.. 2017. Surgical determinants of patient-reported outcomes following postmastectomy reconstruction in women with breast cancer. American Society of Plastic Surgeons 139: 1036e–1045e.Google Scholar
Michell, J. 1999. Measurement in Psychology: A Critical History of a Methodological Concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stenner, J., Smith, M. III and Burdick, D. S.. 1983. Toward a theory of construct definition. Journal of Educational Measurement 4: 305–316.Google Scholar
Tal, E. 2017. Measurement in science. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta., E. N. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/measurement-science/>..>Google Scholar