Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T06:44:36.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimentation under Hierarchy in Local Conditions: Cases of Political Reform in Guangdong and Sichuan, China*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Wen-Hsuan Tsai  and
Nicola Dean
Wen-Hsuan Tsai*
Affiliation:
Academia Sinica.
Nicola Dean
Affiliation:
National Cheng-chi University. Email: [email protected].
*
Email: [email protected] (corresponding author).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reforms carried out by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) have long followed a traditional model of “experimentation under hierarchy.” This article will attempt to develop this model further by building a framework to illustrate the influence of both the political dynamics of hierarchical central–local relations and local economic circumstances in the introduction of large-scale political reforms. The initiation and expansion of “experimental points” are only permitted in those select few provinces with both favourable political and economic local conditions, allowing the CCP to minimize risk and make informed decisions regarding possibilities for nationwide reform. This article proposes that the hierarchical interaction of central and local political elites, and in particular provincial secretaries, can explain the extent of reforms, whereas the type of reform is linked to distinct provincial economic conditions and the provincial secretary's interpretation of provincial priorities. Put succinctly, the CCP's model of political reform can be specifically characterized as “experimentation under hierarchy in local conditions.” This article presents a detailed discussion of both the political and economic considerations inherent in this concept, and provides examples of reform programmes in Guangdong and Sichuan to illustrate the model in practice.

Keywords

central–local relationsChinaexperimentation under hierarchypolitical reformprovincial secretarypublic nomination and direct electionSuper Department System
Type
Articles
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 218 , June 2014 , pp. 339 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was presented at the Eighth Annual Asian Network for the Study of Local China (ANSLoC) Workshop on 3 May 2013 at Academia Sinica in Taiwan. The authors would like to thank Tse-Kang Leng, Jae Ho Chung, Long Yang, Szue-chin Philip Hsu, Szu-Chien Hsu, John A. Donaldson and Xu-feng Zhu for their insightful and constructive comments. In addition, we are also very grateful to the Ministry of Science and Technology in the Republic of China (ROC) for providing the funding to support our research programme.

References

Baum, Richard, and Shevahenko, Alexel. 1999. “The ‘state of the state’.” In Goldman, Merle and MacFarquhar, Roderick (eds.), The Paradox of China's Post-Mao Reforms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 333–360.Google Scholar
Bo, Zhiyue. 2002. Chinese Provincial Leaders: Economic Performance and Political Mobility since 1949. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Christensen, Tom, and Lægreid, Per. 2003. “Administrative reform policy: the challenges of turning symbols into practice.” Public Organization Review 3(1), 3–27.Google Scholar
Christensen, Tom, Lisheng, Dong and Painter, Martin. 2008. “Administrative reform in China's central government: how much ‘learning from the West’?” International Review of Administrative Sciences 74(3), 351–371.Google Scholar
Chung, Jae Ho. 1995. “Studies of central–provincial relations in the People's Republic of China: a mid-term appraisal.” The China Quarterly 142, 487–508.Google Scholar
Chung, Jae Ho. 2000. Central Control and Local Discretion in China: Leadership and Implementation during Post-Mao Decollectivization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ding, Wang. 2001. “Zengqiang jieban reshen yundong zhengzhi xinxing jueqi” (Enhancing the warm-up to political succession and the rising of new political stars). Touzi Zhongguo 88, 51.Google Scholar
Dittmer, Lowell. 1995. “Chinese informal politics.” The China Journal 34, 1–34.Google Scholar
Donaldson, John A. 2009. “Why do similar areas adopt different developmental strategies? A study of two puzzling Chinese provinces.” Journal of Contemporary China 18(60), 421–444.Google Scholar
Dong, Lisheng, Christensen, Tom and Painter, Martin. 2010. “A case study of China's administrative reform: the importation of the super-department.” The American Review of Public Administration 40(2), 170–188.Google Scholar
Dou, Zijia. 2009. Wang Yang chuan (Biography of Wang Yang). Hong Kong: Mingjing Press.Google Scholar
Fewsmith, Joseph. 2013. The Logic and Limits of Political Reform in China. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Florini, Ann, Lai, Hairong and Tan, Yeling. 2012. China Experiments: From Local Innovations to National Reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Gilley, Bruce. 2004. China's Democratic Future: How It Will Happen and Where It Will Lead. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, David S. G. 2000. “The localism of local leadership cadres in reform Shanxi.” Journal of Contemporary China 9(24), 159–183.Google Scholar
He, Baogang. 2007. Rural Democracy in China: The Role of Village Elections. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Heilmann, Sebastian. 2008a. “From local experiments to national policy: the origins of China's distinctive policy process.” The China Journal 59, 1–30.Google Scholar
Heilmann, Sebastian. 2008b. “Policy experimentation in China's economic rise.” Studies in Comparative International Development 43(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Hu, Jun. 2009. “Shengwei shuji de chengzhang zhi lu” (The path to becoming provincial Party secretary). Juece 11, 36–37.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1969. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Susan V. 1994. “Village representative assemblies: democracy, Chinese style.” The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 32, 61–68.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2002. “Elections without democracy: the rise of competitive authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13(2), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Lianjiang. 2002. “The politics of introducing direct township elections in China.” The China Quarterly 171, 704–723.Google Scholar
Li, Linda Chelan. 1998. Centre and Provinces: China 1978–1993, Power as Non-Zero-Sum. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberthal, Kenneth. 2011. Managing the China Challenge: How to Achieve Corporate Success in the People's Republic. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Ling, Tom. 2002. “Delivering joined-up government in the UK: dimensions, issues and problems.” Public Administration 80(4), 615–642.Google Scholar
Manion, Melanie. 2000. “Chinese democratization in perspective: electorates and selectorates at the township level.” The China Quarterly 163, 764–782.Google Scholar
Montinola, Gabriella, Qian, Yingyi and Weingast, Barry R., 1995. “Federalism, Chinese style: the political basis for economic success in China.” World Politics 48(1), 50–81.Google Scholar
Nathan, Andrew J. 1973. “A factionalism model for CCP politics.” The China Quarterly 53, 34–66.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Kevin J., and Li, Lianjiang. 2000. “Accommodating ‘democracy’ in a one-party state: introducing village elections in China.” The China Quarterly 162, 465–489.Google Scholar
Ogden, Suzanne. 2002. Inklings of Democracy in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oi, Jean C., and Rozelle, Scott. 2000. “Election and power: the locus of decision-making in Chinese villages.” The China Quarterly 162, 513–539.Google Scholar
Ovodenko, Alexander, and Keohane, Robert O.. 2012. “Institutional diffusion in international environmental affairs.” International Affairs 88(3), 523–541.Google Scholar
Patton, Michael Q. 1995. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Pei, Minxin. 2006. China's Trapped Transition: The Limits of Developmental Autocracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy. 1999. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The “New Institutionalism.” London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Limongi, Fernando. 1997. “Modernization: theories and facts.” World Politics 49(2), 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, Lucian W. 1966. Aspects of Political Development. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Saich, Tony, and Yang, Xuedong. 2003. “Innovation in China's local governance: ‘open recommendation and selection’.” Pacific Affairs 76(2), 185–208.Google Scholar
Schurmann, Franz. 1968. Organization and Ideology in Communist China. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Tsai, Wen-Hsuan, and Kao, Peng-Hsiang. 2012. “Public nomination and direct election in China: an adaptive mechanism for Party recruitment and regime perpetuation.” Asian Survey 52(3), 484–503.Google Scholar
Vogel, Ezra F. 1989. One Step Ahead in China: Guangdong under Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Huangxiang. 2009. Zhongguo difang zhengfu chuangxin yu jingzheng de xingwei, zhidu ji qi bianhua yanjiu (The Behaviour and System of Innovation and Competition and its Evolution within Chinese Local Government). Beijing: Guangming Daily Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Chu, and He, Linping. 2010. “Shunde ‘da bu zhi’ bannian tan” (Six-month review of the Shunde district ‘super department system’”), people.com, http://politics.people.com.cn/GB/1026/11295056.html. Accessed 15 April 2014.Google Scholar
Wang, Yi. 2003. “Xiangzhen de zizhi he xianzheng: Sichuan sheng Buyun xiangzhang zhixuan zhihou” (Autonomy and restricted government in town and townships: after the introduction of direct election for the Buyun township mayor in Sichuan province). Dangdai Zhongguo yanjiu 10(4), 40–58.Google Scholar
Wei, Liqun. 2011. Zhongguo xingzheng tizhi gaige baogao (China's Administrative System Reform Report). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar
Whiting, Susan. 2004. “The cadre evaluation system at the grass roots: the paradox of Party rule.” In Naughton, Barry and Yang, Dali L. (eds.), Holding China Together: Diversity and National Integration in the Post-Deng Era. New York: Cambridge University Press, 101–119.Google Scholar
Wong, Christine P. W. 1991. “Central–local relations in an era of fiscal decline: the paradox of fiscal decentralization in post-Mao China.” The China Quarterly 128, 691–715.Google Scholar
Wu, Jiannan, Ma, Liang and Yang, Yuqian. 2007. “Zhongguo difang zhengfu chuangxin de dongyin, tezheng yu jixiao” (The impetus, characteristics and outcomes of innovations in local government in China). Guanli yuekan 8, 43–51.Google Scholar
Xia, Ming. 2000. The Dual Developmental State: Development Strategy and Institutional Arrangements for China's Transition. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Yang, Dali L. 2004. Remaking the Chinese Leviathan: Market Transition and the Politics of Governance in China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Yeo, Yukyung. 2009. “Remaking the Chinese state and the nature of economic governance? The early appraisal of the 2008 ‘super-ministry’ reform.” Journal of Contemporary China 18(62), 729–743.Google Scholar
Zheng, Yongnian. 2007. De Facto Federalism in China: Reform and Dynamics of Central–Local Relations. Hackensack: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Zhikun. 2012. “Difang zhengfu chuangxin jiang: Guangdong da bu men tizhi gaige ming lie bangshou” (Local government innovation award: Guangdong's super department system reform tops the list), people.com, http://politics.people.com.cn/GB/70731/16864845.html.Google Scholar