Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T03:49:22.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CQ Sources/Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

Bette Anton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

These CQ Sources were compiled by Bette Anton.

Type
Special Section: Vulnerability Revisited
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 155 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Bulletin of Medical Ethics 2002(182):17–23.Google Scholar
Draft additional protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, on biomedical research. Journal International de Bioéthique 2004;15(1):107–22.Google Scholar
Agich, G, Smith, D, Levine, R. A challenging case: How should an IRB rule when a protocol calls for using an extremely vulnerable population: The dying? Protecting Human Subjects 2005(12):5–6.Google Scholar
Andrews, J. Research in the ranks: Vulnerable subjects, coercible collaboration, and the hepatitis E vaccine trial in Nepal. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 2006;49(1):35–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, R. A theory of international bioethics: Multiculturalism, postmodernism, and the bankruptcy of fundamentalism. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1998;8(3):201–31.Google Scholar
Baker, R. A theory of international bioethics: The negotiable and the non-negotiable. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1998;8(3):233–73.Google Scholar
Barron, JS, Duffey, PL, Byrd, LJ, Campbell, R, Ferrucci, L. Informed consent for research participation in frail older persons. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 2004;16(1):79–85.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, TL, Jennings, B, Kinney, ED, Levine, RJ. Pharmaceutical research involving the homeless. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2002;27(5):547–64.Google Scholar
Blackmer, J, Haddad, H. The Declaration of Helsinki: An update on paragraph 30. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal 2005;173(9):1052–3, available at http://www.cmaj.ca/.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blustein, J. The history and moral foundations of human-subject research. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2007;86(2):82–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borzekowski, DL, Rickert, VI, Ipp, L, Fortenberry, JD. At what price? The current state of subject payment in adolescent research. Journal of Adolescent Health 2003;33(5):378–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brazier, M. Exploitation and enrichment: The paradox of medical experimentation. Journal of Medical Ethics 2008;34(3):180–3.Google Scholar
Coleman, DL. The legal ethics of pediatric research. Duke Law Journal 2007;57(3):517–624.Google ScholarPubMed
Cook-Deegan, RM. Protecting the vulnerable in brain research. Cerebrum 2000;2(2):73–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, World Health Organization. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS; 2002.Google Scholar
Denny, CC, Grady, C. Clinical research with economically disadvantaged populations. Journal of Medical Ethics 2007;33(7):382–5, available at http://jme.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/33/7/382.Google Scholar
Diamant, JC. The revised Declaration of Helsinki—Is justice served? International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2002;40(2):76–83.Google Scholar
Diniz, D. Vulnerability, scientific research and AIDS. Developing World Bioethics 2001;1(2):153–5.Google Scholar
Edwards, SJ. Restricted treatments, inducements, and research participation. Bioethics 2006;20(2):77–91.Google Scholar
Eide, P, Kahn, D. Ethical issues in the qualitative researcher—Participant relationship. Nursing Ethics 2008;15(2):199–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farmer, P, Campos, NG. New malaise: Bioethics and human rights in the global era. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2004;32(2):243–51, 190–1.Google Scholar
Farrell, K. Human experimentation in developing countries: Improving international practices by identifying vulnerable populations and allocating fair benefits. Journal of Health Care Law and Policy 2006;9(1):136–61.Google Scholar
Fisher, CB, Kornetsky, SZ, Prentice, ED. Determining risk in pediatric research with no prospect of direct benefit: Time for a national consensus on the interpretation of federal regulations. American Journal of Bioethics 2007;7(3):5–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleischman, AR, Wood, EB. Ethical issues in research involving victims of terror. Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 2002;79(3):315–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Forster, HP, Emanuel, E, Grady, C. The 2000 revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: A step forward or more confusion? Lancet 2001;358(9291):1449–53.Google Scholar
Gbadegesin, S, Wendler, D. Protecting communities in health research from exploitation. Bioethics 2006;20(5):248–53.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. Protecting groups from genetic research. Bioethics 2008;22(3):157–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horn, L.Research vulnerability: An illustrative case study from the South African mining industry. Developing World Bioethics 2007;7(3):119–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurst, SA. Vulnerability in research and health care: Describing the elephant in the room? Bioethics 2008;22(4):191–202.Google Scholar
Kasturiaratchi, ND. Addressing vulnerabilities in developing countries. Developing World Bioethics 2001;1(2):148–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kipnis, K. Seven vulnerabilities in the pediatric research subject. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2003;24(2):107–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kishore, RR. Biomedical research and mining of the poor: The need for their exclusion. Science and Engineering Ethics 2006;12(1):175–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kottow, MH. The vulnerable and the susceptible. Bioethics 2003;17(5–6):460–71.Google Scholar
Kottow, MH. Vulnerability: What kind of principle is it? Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 2004;7(3):281–7.Google Scholar
Kottow, MH. Who is my brother's keeper? Journal of Medical Ethics 2002;28(1):24–7.Google Scholar
Lanter, J. Clinical research with cognitively impaired subjects: issues for nurses. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing 2006;25(2):89–92.Google Scholar
Leavitt, FJ. Is any medical research population not vulnerable? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2006;15(1):81–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, BH.Subjects or objects? Prisoners and human experimentation. New England Journal of Medicine 2007;356(18):1806–7.Google Scholar
Leshner, AI. Ethical issues in taking neuroscience research from bench to bedside. Cerebrum 2004;6(4):66–72.Google Scholar
Levine, C, Faden, R, Grady, C, Hammerschmidt, D, Eckenwiler, L, Sugarman, J. The limitations of “vulnerability” as a protection for human research participants. American Journal of Bioethics 2004;4(3):44–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lie, RK, Emanuel, E, Grady, C, Wendler, D. The standard of care debate: The Declaration of Helsinki versus the international consensus opinion. Journal of Medical Ethics 2004;30(2):190–3, available at http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1733825&blobtype=pdf.Google Scholar
Locher, JL, Bronstein, J, Robinson, CO, Williams, C, Ritchie, CS. Ethical issues involving research conducted with homebound older adults. Gerontologist 2006;46(2):160–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macklin, R.After Helsinki: Unresolved issues in international research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2001;11(1):17–36.Google Scholar
Macklin, R.Bioethics, vulnerability, and protection. Bioethics 2003;17(5–6):472–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maschke, KJ. Human research protections: Time for regulatory reform? Hastings Center Report 2008;38(2):19–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molyneux, CS, Wassenaar, DR, Peshu, N, Marsh, K. 'Even if they ask you to stand by a tree all day, you will have to do it (laughter)… !': Community voices on the notion and practice of informed consent for biomedical research in developing countries. Social Science & Medicine 2005;61(2):443–54.Google Scholar
Moodley, K. Microbicide research in developing countries: Have we given the ethical concerns due consideration? BMC Medical Ethics 2007;8:10, available at http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=2082018&blobtype=pdf.Google Scholar
Mooney, G. Why not community values in all health research and for all cultures? Monash Bioethics Review 2006;25(1):72–4.Google Scholar
National Institutes of Health. Office of Human Subjects Research. Directives for Human Experimentation. Nuremberg Code. Reprinted from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181–182. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1949, available at http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html.Google Scholar
Newton, SK, Appiah-Poku, J. Opinions of researchers based in the UK on recruiting subjects from developing countries into randomized controlled trials. Developing World Bioethics 2007;7(3):149–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nickel, PJ. Vulnerable populations in research: The case of the seriously ill. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2006;27(3):245–64.Google Scholar
Quest, T, Marco, CA. Ethics seminars: Vulnerable populations in emergency medicine research. Academic Emergency Medicine 2003;10(11):1294–8.Google Scholar
Quigley, D. A review of improved ethical practices in environmental and public health research: Case examples from native communities. Health Education and Behavior 2006;33(2):130–47.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. Rethinking research ethics. American Journal of Bioethics 2005;5(1):7–28.Google Scholar
Richter, MS, Groft, JN, Prinsloo, L. Ethical issues surrounding studies with vulnerable populations: A case study of South African street children. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health 2007;19(2):117–26.Google Scholar
Roman, J.U.S. medical research in the developing world: Ignoring Nuremberg. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 2002;11(2):441–60.Google Scholar
Rothman, DJ. The shame of medical research. New York Review of Books 2000;47(19):60–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Ruof, MC.Vulnerability, vulnerable populations, and policy. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2004;14(4):411–25.Google Scholar
Schuklenk, U. Protecting the vulnerable: Testing times for clinical research ethics. Social Science and Medicine 2000;51(6):969–77.Google Scholar
Slaughter, S, Cole, D, Jennings, E, Reimer, MA. Consent and assent to participate in research from people with dementia. Nursing Ethics 2007;14(1):27–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sleeboom, M.The Harvard case of Xu Xiping: Exploitation of the people, scientific advance, or genetic theft? New Genetics and Society 2005;24(1):57–78.Google Scholar
Smith, LJ. How ethical is ethical research? Recruiting marginalized, vulnerable groups into health services research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2008;62(2):248–57.Google Scholar
Sutton, LB, Erlen, JA, Glad, JM, Siminoff, LA. Recruiting vulnerable populations for research: Revisiting the ethical issues. Journal of Professional Nursing 2003;19(2):106–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research; 1979 April 18, available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm.Google Scholar
Tollman, SM, Bastian, H, Doll, R, Hirsch, LJ, Guess, HA. What are the effects of the fifth revision of the Declaration of Helsinki? British Medical Journal 2001;323(7326):1417–23, available at http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1121866&blobtype=pdf.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Upshur, RE, Lavery, JV, Tindana, PO. Taking tissue seriously means taking communities seriously. BMC Medical Ethics 2007;8:11, available at http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=2151950&blobtype=pdf.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanderstaay, SL. One hundred dollars and a dead man—Ethical decision making in ethnographic fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 2005;34(4):371–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varma, S, Wendler, D. Research involving wards of the state: Protecting particularly vulnerable children. Journal of Pediatrics 2008;152(1):9–14.Google Scholar
Verastegui, EL. Consenting of the vulnerable: The informed consent procedure in advanced cancer patients in Mexico. BMC Medical Ethics 2006;7:E13, available at http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1764745&blobtype=pdf.Google Scholar
Walker, RL. Human and animal subjects of research: The moral significance of respect versus welfare. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2006;27(4):305–31.Google Scholar
Weinstein, M. A public culture for guinea pigs: US human research subjects after the Tuskegee study. Science as Culture 2001;10(2):195–223.Google Scholar
Wendler, D. Protecting subjects who cannot give consent: Toward a better standard for “minimal” risks. Hastings Center Report 2005;35(5):37–43.Google Scholar
Wendler, D. Risk standards for pediatric research: Rethinking the Grimes ruling. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2004;14(2):187–98.Google Scholar
World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Helsinki: World Medical Association; 2004, available at http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm.Google Scholar
Yan, EG, Munir, KM. Regulatory and ethical principles in research involving children and individuals with developmental disabilities. Ethics and Behavior 2004;14(1):31–49.Google Scholar
Zion, D. Justice as equitable power relations: Beyond the “standard of care” debate and the Declaration of Helsinki. American Journal of Bioethics 2003;3(2):W12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed