Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:07:23.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preparing Adolescents for Life after School (PALS) Project: A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Coaching Intervention for Young People with Acquired Brain Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2018

Robyn L. Tate ,
Michelle Genders ,
Cheryl Soo ,
Ulrike Rosenkoetter ,
Margaret Dunn  and
Rachel Briggs
Robyn L. Tate*
Affiliation:
John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Royal North Shore Hospital and University of Sydney, Australia
Michelle Genders
Affiliation:
John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Royal North Shore Hospital and University of Sydney, Australia
Cheryl Soo
Affiliation:
Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Ulrike Rosenkoetter
Affiliation:
John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Royal North Shore Hospital and University of Sydney, Australia
Margaret Dunn
Affiliation:
John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Royal North Shore Hospital and University of Sydney, Australia
Rachel Briggs
Affiliation:
John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Royal North Shore Hospital and University of Sydney, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Professor Robyn Tate, John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Level 12, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, Pacific Highway, St Leonards, Australia. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Introduction: Existing resources to support adolescents with acquired brain injury (ABI) in transition from school to the ‘adult world’ are variable. This study evaluated an intervention using a coaching approach to support adolescents during this transition phase.

Method: The study design was a parallel-group randomised controlled trial (RCT). Participants (n = 43) aged 14–19 years were randomised to intervention (n = 21) or no-intervention control (n = 21) conditions. The intervention group received six coaching sessions over an average of 22 weeks. Outcome measures evaluated changes reported by the adolescent (satisfaction, emotional functioning and hope) and their parent (participation, behaviour and support needs).

Results: Relative to baseline, there was no significant improvement for those in the intervention group in comparison to the control group on any of the outcome measures.

Conclusion: The results of this RCT do not support coaching as an intervention for adolescents with ABI.

Keywords

Acquired brain injuryhigh school transitionadolescentcoachingrandomised controlled trialintervention
Type
Articles
Information
Brain Impairment , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, V., & Yeates, K.O. (2014). Children and adolescents. In: Levin, L.S., Shum, D.H.K. & Chan, R.C.K. (Eds.), Understanding traumatic brain injury. Current research and future directions (pp. 333–355). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bedell, G.M. (2004). Developing a follow-up survey focused on participation of children and youth with acquired brain injuries discharged from inpatient rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation, 19, 191–205.Google Scholar
Benz, M.R., Lindstrom, L., & Yovanoff, P. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66 (4), 509–529.Google Scholar
Bedell, G.M., & Dumas, H.M. (2004). Social participation of children and youth with acquired brain injuries discharged from inpatient rehabilitation: A follow-up study. Brain Injury, 18 (1), 65–82.Google Scholar
Blosser, J., & DePompei, R. (2003). Pediatric brain injury: Proactive intervention (2nd ed.). New York: Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
Borelli, B. (2011). The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 71, S52–S63.Google Scholar
Bumbarger, B.K. (2014). Understanding and promoting treatment integrity in prevention. In Sanetti, L.M.H. & Kratochwill, T.R. (Eds.), Treatment integrity. A foundation for evidence-based practice in applied psychology (pp. 35–54). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Catroppa, C., Godfrey, C., Clasby, B., & Anderson, V. (2017). Children with traumatic brain injury. In Wilson, B.A., Winegardner, J., van Heugten, C.M. & Ownsworth, T. (Eds.), Neuropsychological rehabilitation. The international handbook (pp. 102–112). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clements, K., & Turpin, G. (1996). The life events scale for students: Validation for use with British samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 747–751.Google Scholar
Connor, K., Dettmer, J., Dise-Lewis, J.E., Murphy, M., Santistevan, B., & Steckinger, B. (2001). Brain injury in children and youth: A manual for educators. Colorado Department of Education State Library and Education Office. Retrieved from https://www.cde.state.co.us/cdesped/tbi_manual_braininjury [cited 2016 Aug 31].Google Scholar
Dawson, P., & Guare, R. (2009). Executive skills in children and adolescents: A practical guide to assessment and intervention. New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49 (1), 71–75.Google Scholar
Dohrenwend, B.S., Krasnoff, L., Askenasy, A.R., & Dohrenwend, B.P. (1978). Exemplification of a method for scaling life events: The PERI life events scale. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19 (2), 205–299.Google Scholar
Epstein, N.B., Bladwin, L.M., & Bishop, D.S. (1983). The McMaster family assessment device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9, 171–180.Google Scholar
Grant, A.M. (2003). The impact of life coaching on goal attainment, metacognition and mental health. Social Behavior and Personality, 31, 253–264.Google Scholar
Green, L.S., Oades, L.G., & Grant, A.M. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral, solution-focused life coaching: Enhancing goal striving, well-being and hope. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 142–149.Google Scholar
Green, S., Grant, A., & Rynsaardt, J. (2007). Evidence based life coaching for senior high school students: Building hardiness and hope. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2, 24–32.Google Scholar
Herth, K. (1991). Development and refinement of an instrument to measure hope. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 5, 39–51.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T.C., Glasziou, P.P., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D.G., . . . Michie, S. (2014). Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIEieR) checklist and guide. BMJ, 348, g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g 1687.Google Scholar
Izumi, S., Ando, K., Ono, M., Suzukamo, Y., Michimata, A., & Fukuhara, S. (2007). Effect of coaching on psychological adjustment in patients with spinocerebellar degeneration: A pilot study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 21, 987–996.Google Scholar
Kelly, G., Todd, J., Simpson, G., Kremer, P., & Martin, C. (2006). The Overt Behaviour Scale (OBS): A tool for measuring challenging behaviours following ABI in community settings. Brain Injury, 20, 307–319.Google Scholar
Kennedy, M.R.T., & Krause, M.O. (2011). Self-regulated learning in a dynamic coaching model for supporting college students with traumatic brain injury: Two case reports. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 26, 212–223.Google Scholar
Lam, C.S., Chan, F., & McMahon, B.T. (1991). Factorial structure of the Change Assessment Questionnaire for individuals with traumatic head injuries. Rehabilitation Psychology, 36, 212–223.Google Scholar
Lam, C.S., McMahon, B.T., Priddy, D.A., & Gehred-Schulz, A. (1988). Deficit awareness and treatment performance among traumatic head injury adults. Brain Injury, 2, 235–242.Google Scholar
Landgraf, J.M., Abetz, L., & Ware, J.E. (1996). The Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ): A user's manual. Boston: Health Institute, New England Medical Center.Google Scholar
Landmark, L.J., Ju, S., & Zhang, D. (2010). Substantiated best practices in transition: Fifteen plus years later. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33 (3), 165–176.Google Scholar
Law, M., Baptiste, S., Carswell, A., McColl, M.A., Polatajko, H., & Pollock, N. (2005). Canadian occupational performance measure. Canada: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists.Google Scholar
Linder, H., Menzies, D., Kelly, J., Taylor, S., & Shearer, M. (2003). Coaching for behaviour change in chronic disease: A review of the literature and implications for coaching as a self-management intervention. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 9, 177–184.Google Scholar
Lovibond, P.F., & Lovibond, S.H. (1995). Manual for the depression, anxiety, stress scales (2nd ed.). Sydney: Psychological Foundation.Google Scholar
Machamer, J., Temkin, N., & Dikmen, S. (2002). Significant other burden and factors related to it in traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 420–433.Google Scholar
Maher, C.G., Sherrington, C., Herbert, R.D., Moseley, A.M., & Elkins, M. (2003). Reliability of the PEDro school for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Physical Therapy, 83, 713–721.Google Scholar
Merriman, D.E., & Codding, R.S. (2008). The effects of coaching on mathematics homework completion and accuracy of high school students with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 339–355.Google Scholar
Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K.F., Montori, V., Gotzsche, P.C., Deveraux, P.J., . . . Altman, , , D.G. (2010). CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trial. BMJ, 340, c896.Google Scholar
Pan, A.W., Chung, L., & Hsin-Hwei, G. (2003). Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for clients with psychiatric disorders in Taiwan. Occupational Therapy International, 10 (4), 269–277.Google Scholar
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). The affective and cognitive context of self-reported measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 28 (1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Reistetter, T.A., Spencer, J.C., Trujillo, L., & Abreu, B.C. (2005). Examining the Community Integration Measure (CIM): a replication study with life satisfaction. NeuroRehabilitation, 20 (2), 139–148.Google Scholar
Sanetti, L.M.H., & Kratochwill, T.R. (Eds.) (2014). Treatment Integrity. A foundation for evidence-based practice in applied psychology. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Sleeper-Triplett, J. (2008). The effectiveness of coaching for children and teens with AD/HD. Pediatric Nursing, 34, 433–435.Google Scholar
Soo, C., Tate, R., Hopman, K., Forman, M., Secheny, T., Aird, V., . . . & Coulston, C. (2007). Reliability of the care and needs scale for assessing support needs after traumatic brain injury. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation, 22 (5), 288–295.Google Scholar
Swartz, S.L., Prevatt, F., & Proctor, B.E. (2005). A coaching intervention for college students with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 647–655.Google Scholar
Swearington, E.M., & Cohen, L.H. (1985). Measurement of adolescent's life event: The junior high life experiences survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 69–85.Google Scholar
Tate, R.L. (2004). Assessing support needs for people with traumatic brain injury: The care and needs scale. Brain Injury, 18, 445–460.Google Scholar
Tate, R.L., & Perdices, M. (in press). Single-case experimental designs for clinical research and neurorehabilitation settings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tate, R.L., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Wakim, D., Godbee, K., Togher, L., & McDonald, S. (2013). Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs and n-of-1 trials: The 15-item risk of bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23 (5), 619–638.Google Scholar
Test, D.W., Fowler, C.H., Richter, S.M., White, J., Mazzotti, V., Walker, A.R., . . . Kortering, L. (2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32 (2), 115–128.Google Scholar
Todis, B., & Glang, A. (2008). Redefining success: Results of a qualitative study of postsecondary transition outcomes for youth with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 23, 252–263.Google Scholar
Waters, E., Salmon, L., Wake, M., Wright, M., & Hesketh, K. (1999). The interpretation guide for the Australian authorised adaptation of the child health questionnaire: Parent/proxy form: CHQ PF-50 and PF-28. Melbourne: Centre for Community Child Health.Google Scholar
Wehman, P. (2006). Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities (4th ed.). Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Wehman, P., Chen, C.C., West, M., & Cifu, G. (2014). Transition planning for youth with traumatic brain injury: Findings from the national longitudinal transition survey-2. NeuroRehabilitation, 34, 365–372.Google Scholar
Ylvisaker, M., McPherson, K., Kayes, N., & Pellet, E. (2008). Metaphoric identity mapping: Facilitating goal setting and engagement in rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18, 713–741.Google Scholar