Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:56:23.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The limits to ‘fuzziness’ in the L2 learner

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2022

Ramesh Kumar Mishra
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , March 2022 , pp. 228 - 229
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhatia, D, Prasad, SG, Sake, K and Mishra, RK (2017). Task irrelevant external cues can influence language selection in voluntary object naming: Evidence from Hindi–English bilinguals. PloS one 12(1), e0169284.10.1371/journal.pone.0169284CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bordag, D, Gor, K and Opitz, A (2021). Ontogenesis model of the L2 lexical representation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000250Google Scholar
Clahsen, H and Felser, C (2006). How native-like is non-native language processing?. Trends in cognitive sciences 10(12), 564–570.10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijkstra, T and Van Heuven, WJ (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and cognition 5(3), 175–197.10.1017/S1366728902003012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, JF and Stewart, E (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of memory and language 33(2), 149–174.10.1006/jmla.1994.1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, RK (2015). Interaction between attention and language systems in humans. New Delhi, India: Springer.10.1007/978-81-322-2592-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P (1995). Attention, memory, and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language learning 45(2), 283–331.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00441.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. Attention and awareness in foreign language learning 9, 1–63.Google Scholar
Shook, A and Marian, V (2013). The bilingual language interaction network for comprehension of speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16(2), 304–324.10.1017/S1366728912000466CrossRefGoogle Scholar