Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:51:50.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Data before models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2016

SHANA POPLACK  and
RENA TORRES CACOULLOS
SHANA POPLACK*
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
RENA TORRES CACOULLOS
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
*
Address for correspondence: Prof. Shana Poplack, University of Ottawa, Department of Linguistics, 401–70 Laurier Avenue East, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

New theories are a constant of the now vast literature on code-mixing (CM). The Gradient Symbolic Computation model proposed by Goldrick, Putnam and Schwartz (Goldrick, Putnam & Schwartz) will appeal to many, especially those who already espouse constraint-based approaches to grammar. As variationist sociolinguists, we particularly welcome the model's incorporation of “relative probabilities of certain structures”, a feature we believe can enhance our chances of capturing actual CM behavior. We also applaud Goldrick et al.’s efforts to integrate experimental findings on co-activation with grammatical principles. Our questions concern the utility of “doubling constructions” to showcase the model, and by extension, the degree to which it can account for bilinguals’ spontaneous production of CM. A historical perspective on the field shows that none of the myriad theories of CM, often inspired by competing sets of grammatical principles, has yet achieved broad acceptance. In the absence of any widely endorsed evaluation metric – still sadly lacking -– how are we to decide amongst them?

Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 19 , Issue 5 , November 2016 , pp. 893 - 894
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, E. L. (2015). The role of discourse context frequency in phonological variation: A usage-based approach to bilingual speech production. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19, 387–406.Google Scholar
Goldrick, M., Putnam, M., & Schwartz, L. Coactivation in bilingual grammars: A computational account of code mixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. doi: dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000802.Google Scholar
Poplack, S. (1980). Sometimes I'll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en Español. Linguistics, 18, 581–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S., & Meechan, M. (eds.). (1998). Instant loans, easy conditions: the productivity of bilingual borrowing. International Journal of Bilingualism 2, 2.Google Scholar
Poplack, S., Sayahi, L., Mourad, N., & Dion, N. (2015). An exception to the rule? Lone French nouns in Tunisian Arabic. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 21,2: Selected papers from NWAV 43, 175–186.Google Scholar
Poplack, S., Wheeler, S., & Westwood, A. (1987). Distinguishing language contact phenomena: evidence from Finnish-English bilingualism. In Lilius, P. & Saari, M. (eds.), The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 6, pp. 33–56. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Press.Google Scholar
Poplack, S., Zentz, L., & Dion, N. (2012). Phrase-final prepositions in Quebec French: An empirical study of contact, code-switching and resistance to convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, D., Poplack, S., & Vanniarajan, S. (1990). The case of the nonce loan in Tamil. Language Variation and Change, 2, 71–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (2008). The limits of convergence in contact. Journal of Language Contact, 2, 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C. E. (2015). Two languages, one effect: Structural priming in spontaneous code-switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, doi: 10.1017/S1366728914000406. Published online by Cambridge University Press, April 30, 2015.Google Scholar
Travis, C. E., Torres Cacoullos, R., & Kidd, E. (2015). Cross-language priming: A view from bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10.1017/S1366728915000127, Published online by Cambridge University Press, 03 July 2015.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1963). Languages in contact: Findings and problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar