Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T19:29:22.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computational modeling of bilingualism: How can models tell us more about the bilingual mind?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2013

PING LI
PING LI*
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
*
Address for correspondence: Department of Psychology and Center for Brain, Behavior, and Cognition, University Park, PA 16802, USA[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Models are no new beasts to scholars of bilingualism. During the last several decades we have seen many interesting and important models that postulate how the bilingual mind works. But specific, computationally implemented, models are far less common than general, verbal, models of bilingualism. This is because the former require efforts on the part of the researcher to conduct algorithmic and representational implementations, whereas the latter do not. The central question is: What good does implementation do in telling us about the bilingual mind beyond what the verbal models do? This Special Issue is an attempt to address this question with seven computational models of bilingualism from different research labs.

Type
Introduction
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 16 , Issue 2: Computational Modeling of Bilingualism , April 2013 , pp. 241 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Preparation of this article was supported by a grant from the US National Science Foundation (BCS-1057855). I would like to thank Viorica Marian and other colleagues for organizing and participating in the Workshop on Computational Modeling of Bilingualism: Integrating Acquisition and Processing at the 8th International Symposium on Bilingualism (ISB8). Several papers in this Special Issue are based on presentations made at the workshop, including Shook and Marian, Zevin and Yang, and Zhao and Li.

References

Abutalebi, J. (2008). Neural aspects of second language representation and language control. Acta Psychologica, 128, 466–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Addyman, C., & French, R. (2012). Computational modeling in cognitive science: A manifesto for change. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 332–341.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. (1998). The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. In Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition, pp. 189–225. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
French, R., & Jacquet, M. (2004). Understanding bilingual memory. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 87–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, H. (1985). The mind's new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Green, D. (2003). The neural basis of the lexicon and the grammar in L2 acquisition. In van, R. Hout, Hulk, A., Kuiken, F. & Towell, R. (eds.), The interface between syntax and the lexicon in second language acquisition, pp. 197–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F., & Li, P. (2013). The psycholinguistics of bilingualism. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hernandez, A., Li, P., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 220–225.Google Scholar
Johnson, J., & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.Google Scholar
Lewy, N., & Grosjean, F. (2008). The Lewy and Grosjean BIMOLA model. In Grosjean, F. (ed.), Studying bilinguals, pp. 201–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, P., & Farkas, I. (2002). A self-organizing connectionist model of bilingual processing. In Heredia, R. R. & Altarriba, J. (eds.), Bilingual sentence processing, pp. 59–85. Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P., Tan, L.-H., Bates, E., & Tzeng, O. (2006). The handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics (vol. 1): Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P., & Zhao, X. (2012). Connectionism. In Aronoff, M. (ed.), Oxford bibliographies online (Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (www.oxfordbibliographies.com)Google Scholar
Li, P., & Zhao, X. (2013). Connectionism. In Chapelle, C. A. (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Li, P., & Zhao, X. (in press). Connectionist models of second language acquisition. In Mayo, M. P. García (ed.), Contemporary second language acquisition theories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2010). Computational models of child language learning: An introduction. Journal of Child Language, 37, 477–485.Google Scholar
McClelland, J. (2009). The place of modeling in cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 11–38.Google Scholar
Miikkulainen, R. (1997). Dyslexic and category-specific aphasic impairments in a self-organizing feature map model of the lexicon. Brain and Language, 59, 334–366.Google Scholar
Miikkulainen, R., & Kiran, S. (2009). Modeling the bilingual lexicon of an individual subject. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Self-Organizing Maps (WSOM’09) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5629), pp. 191–199.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C., Liu, Y., Fiez, J., Nelson, J., Bolger, D., & Tan, L. (2007). Reading in two writing systems: Accommodation and assimilation of the brain's reading network. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 131–146.Google Scholar
Thomas, M., & van Heuven, W. (2005). Computational models of bilingual comprehension. In Kroll, J. F. & de, A. M. B. Groot (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, pp. 497–515. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, X., & Li, P. (2010). Bilingual lexical interactions in an unsupervised neural network model. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13, 505–524.Google Scholar