Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:08:31.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What kind of selection?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2009

Anne Campbell
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom. [email protected]

Abstract

Supporting a mediating role for fear in inhibiting female aggression, a recent study shows that aversion to “risky” impulsivity completely mediates the sex difference in direct aggression but not in angry acts where dangerous retaliation is unlikely. A more inclusive use of the term “sexual selection” to encompass reproductive advantage would recognise females' crucial role in nurturing and protecting offspring.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, A. (1999) Staying alive: Evolution, culture and women's intra-sexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:203–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. (2002) A mind of her own: The evolutionary psychology of women. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. & Muncer, S.(in press) Can “risky” impulsivity explain sex differences in aggression? Personality and Individual Differences.Google Scholar
Carranza, J. (2009) Defining sexual selection as sex-dependent selection. Animal Behaviour 77:749–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2007) Sexual selection in males and females. Science 318:1882–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daly, M. & Wilson, M. (1988) Homicide. Aldine de Gruyter.Google ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. (1871/2004) The descent of man: And selection in relation to sex. Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1871.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (1999) Mother Nature: Natural selection and the female of the species. Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, E. (2006) Debating sexual selection and mating strategies. Science 312:689–97.Google Scholar
Lassek, W. D. & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2008) Waist-hip ratio and cognitive ability: Is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources? Evolution and Human Behavior 29:2634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlowski, B. & Grabarczyk, M. (2003) Center of body mass and the evolution of female body shape. American Journal of Human Biology 15:144–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roughgarden, J., Oisha, M. & Akcay, E. (2006) Reproductive social behavior: Cooperative games to replace sexual selection. Science 311:965–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tovee, M. J. & Cornelissen, P. L. (1999) The mystery of female beauty. Nature 399(6733):215–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, D. W. & Shepard, G. H. (1999) The mystery of female beauty: Reply. Nature 399(6733):216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar