Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:21:45.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Special Education may be too Special

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Brian E. Richardson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The suggestion is made, in this paper, that too many children have been placed in Special Schools for the physically handicapped. One of the reasons for this has been the tendency for the community to use the terms impairment, disability and handicap, interchangeably. An attempt is made to clarify the difference between these terms. It is claimed that there should be “compelling educational reasons” before a child is placed anywhere other than a regular class in a regular school. Guidelines for determining alternative placements are suggested. The paper claims that, in Australia, there does not exist an appropriate continuum of educationl service provision for children with physical disabilities. It is contended that too little use is made of the special class within a regular school.

Historically it has been the practice to educate a child with a significant physical disability in a special school. Of course there have been some exceptions to this practice, but it has never-the-less been true that a child with, say, athetoid cerebral palsy, would probably have been placed in a “special school for the physically handicapped”. Fortunately that situation is changing and it is appropriate that we look now at both why the special placement model was so popular, and also what factors should be considered in determining an educational placement today.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , November 1982 , pp. 37 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allsop, J. Mainstreaming physically handicapped children. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1980, 13 (4), 37–44.Google Scholar
Blumberg, L. The case for integrated schooling. Exceptional Parent, 1973, 3 (4), 15–17.Google Scholar
Britton, E. Warnock and integration. Educational Research, 1978, 21 (1), 3–9.Google Scholar
Gromek, L., and Scandary, J. Considerations in the educational placement of physically or otherwise health impaired child. Division on the Physically Handicapped, Homebound and Hospitalised Journal, 1977, 3(1), 9–11.Google Scholar
Haskell, S. H., and Anderson, E. M. Physically Handicapped Children: special or normal schooling? Slow Learning Child, 1969, 16 (3), 150–161.Google Scholar
Ingram, T. T. S., Jameson, S., Errington, J., and Mitchell, R. G. Living with cerebral palsy. Clinics in Developmental Medicine, 1964, 14.Google Scholar
Klapper, Z. S., and Birch, H. G. The relation of childhood characteristics to outcome in young adults with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1966, 8, 645–656.Google Scholar
Reynolds, M. C., and Birch, J. W. Teaching exceptional children in all America’s schools. Reston, Virginia: Council for Exceptional Children, 1977.Google Scholar
Stevens, G. D. Taxonomy in special education for children with body disorders. Pittsburgh: Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, 1962.Google Scholar
Wall, W. D. Constructive education for special groups. London: Harrop/Unesco, 1979.Google Scholar