Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T22:39:16.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Reliability and Validity of a Scale to Measure Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Integration in an Australian Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Clare Roberts  and
Chris Pratt
Clare Roberts*
Affiliation:
The University of Western Australia
Chris Pratt
Affiliation:
The University of Western Australia
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Clare Roberts at the Clinical Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, W.A. 6009.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates, in an Australian context, the psychometric properties of reliability and construct validity of a scale to measure the attitudes of teachers toward the integration of handicapped children into regular schools. The responses of a sample of 301 primary school staff were factor analysed to determine the factorial validity of the 30-item scale. The scale was found to have an underlying conceptual framework of five factors, which could be used to investigate various aspects of a teacher’s attitude toward integration. The psychometric characteristics of the scale indicate that it is both reliable and factorially valid in an Australian context and that it is valid to make comparisons between American and Australian data using the scale.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , November 1988 , pp. 31 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beasley, K. (Ed.). (1984). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Education in Western Australia. Perth: Department of Education.Google Scholar
Berryman, J.D. & Neal, N.R. (1980). The cross validation of the attitudes toward mainstreaming scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 469–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, M.K. (1984). Integration in Victorian Education. Report of the Ministerial Review of Educational Services for the Disabled. Melbourne: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, W.J. (1981). BMDP statistical software. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Green, K., Rock, D.L., & Weisenstein, G.R. (1983). Validity and reliability of scale assessing attitudes toward mainstreaming. Exceptional Children, 50, 182–183.Google Scholar
Gresham, F.M. (1982). Misguided mainstreaming: The case for social skills training with handicapped children. Exceptional Children, 48, 422–433.Google Scholar
Hudson, A., & Clunies-Ross, G. (1984). A study of the integration of children with intellectual handicaps into regular schools. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 10, 165–177.Google Scholar
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1986). Mainstreaming and cooperative learning strategies. Exceptional Children, 52, 553–561.Google Scholar
Kaufman, M., Agard, J.A., & Semmel, M.I. (1985). Mainstreaming: Learners and their environments. Cambridge, MA.: Brookline Books.Google Scholar
Kim, J.O., & Mueller, C.W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Larrivee, B. (1981). Effects of inservice training intensity on teacher’s attitude toward mainstreaming. Exceptional Children, 48, 34–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larrivee, B. (1982). Factors underlying regular classroom teacher’s attitude toward mainstreaming. Psychology in the Schools, 19. 374–379.Google Scholar
Larrivee, B. & Cook, L. (1979). Mainstreaming: A study of the variables affecting teacher attitude. The Journal of Special Education, 13, 315–324.Google Scholar
Reynolds, W.M. & Greco, V.T. (1980). The reliability and factorial validity of a scale for measuring teacher’s attitudes toward mainstreaming. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 463–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. & Pratt, C. (1987). The attitudes of primary school staff toward the integration of mildly disabled children. In Bartnick, E.A., Lewis, G.M., & O’Connor, P.A. (Eds.), Technology, resources and consumer outcomes: Proceedings of the Twenty Third National Conference of the Australian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability. Perth: P.E. Publications.Google Scholar
Schmelkin, L.P. (1981). Teachers’ and non-teachers’ attitudes toward mainstreaming. Exceptional Children, 48, 42–47.Google Scholar