Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:39:27.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methods of Teaching Word Identification to Backward Third Grade Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Peter Cole  and
Jeanette Connolly
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an attempt to improve the word identification of backward readers, three methods of instruction and three different forms of orthography were compared. There were no differences among read and say, read and spell, and read, trace and spell methods. There were also no differences among treatments that compared a coloured orthography, syllabified words and traditional orthography. However, in a second experiment, it was found that a mastery learning method was superior to a traditional method of instruction, though the validity of the mastery learning procedures was questioned in this context.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , May 1983 , pp. 5 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allington, R. L. “Color as an attentional cue in discrimination learning”. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 1976, 8, 183 192.Google Scholar
Benz, D., and Rosemier, R. “Word analysis and comprehension”. In Dawson, M. A. (Ed.) Teaching Word Recognition Skills. Newark, IRA, 1971.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. Human Characteristics and School Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.Google Scholar
Canney, G., and Schreiner, R. “A study of the effectiveness of selected syllabication rules and phonogram patterns for word attack”. Reading Research Quarterly, 1976–1977, 12, 2, 102 – 124.Google Scholar
Downing, J. “How society creates reading disability”. The Elementary School Journal, 1977, 77, 274 – 279.Google Scholar
Engelmann, S., and Bruner, E. Distar. Reading Level. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1974.Google Scholar
Fernald, G. Remedial Techniques in the Basic School Subjects. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1943.Google Scholar
Gattegno, C. Words in Color. Chicago: Learning Materials, 1962.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L., and Rosen, P. “Teaching reading by use of syllabary”. Reading Research Quarterly, 1973, 8, 447 – 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, K. S. “The 13th way to make learning to read more difficult: a reaction to Gleitman and Rozin”. Reading Research Quarterly, 1973, 8, 4, 184 – 493.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., and Tyler, S. J. “Cognition and instruction of poor readers”. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 1978, 10, 1, 57–78.Google Scholar
Haring, N. G., and Bateman, B. Teaching the Learning Disabled Child. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1977.Google Scholar
Knafle, J. D. “Word perception: cues aiding structure detection”. Reading Research Quarterly, 1973, 8, 502 – 523.Google Scholar
Martin, J. G., and Meltzer, R. H. ‘Rhythms: report on a method for facilitating the teaching of reading.’ Journal of Reading Behaviour, 1976, 8, 153 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otto, W., McMenemy, R. A., and Smith, R. J. Corrective and Remedial Teaching, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1973.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W. “Rebuses as a medium in beginning reading instruction”. IMRID, V, 4, Nashville: George Peabody College, 1968.Google Scholar
Wong, B. “The effects of directive cues on the organization of memory and recall in good and poor readers”. Journal of Educational Research, 1978, 72, 32 – 38.Google Scholar