Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T03:20:57.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Instructional Assistance in First Grade Remedial Group Instruction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Barry A. Fields
Barry A. Fields*
Affiliation:
Darling Downs Institute of Advanced Education
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Several recent reviews of research on teaching and in particular research on teacher effectiveness have identified three variables: pupil engaged time, direct instruction and efficient classroom management as the most significant instructional factors related to pupil achievement (Barnes, 1981; Brophy, 1979, 1980; Good, 1979, 1982; and Rosenshine, 1976, 1979). While these findings, within the context of basic skill instruction, are unequivocal and now largely accepted within the educational community, their overemphasis to the virtual exclusion of other important classroom variables has led a number of researchers and teacher educators to express some concern (Griffin, Webb and Confrey, 1981; Roehler and Duffy, 1981).

Type
Research and Review
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , May 1984 , pp. 13 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, S. Synthesis of selected research on teaching findings. Austin, Texas: The University of Texas at Austin, Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, September 1981.Google Scholar
Brophy, J. Teacher behaviour and its effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979, 71 (6), 733–750 Google Scholar
Brophy, J. Recent research on teaching (Occasional Paper No. 40). East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching, November 1980.Google Scholar
Brophy, J., Rohrkemper, M., Rashid, H. and Goldberger, M. Relationships between teachers’ presentations of classroom tasks and students’ engagement in those tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1983, 75 (4), 544–552.Google Scholar
Bush, A., Kennedy, J. &Cruickshank, D. An empirical investigation of teacher clarity. Journal of Teacher Education, 1977, 28, 53–58.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, D., Myers, B. & Moenjak, T. Statements of clear teacher behaviors provided by 1009 students in grades 6–9. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio State University, 1975.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, D., Kennedy, J., Bush, A. & Myers, B. Clear teaching: what is it? British Journal of Teacher EducationalAh, 5 (1), 27–33.Google Scholar
Doyle, W. Student mediating responses in teaching effectiveness (Final Report NIE-G-76–0099). Denton Texas: North Texas State University, 1980.Google Scholar
Duffy, G. From turn taking to sense making: Broad ening the concept of reader teacher effectiveness. Journal of Educational Research, 1983, 76 (3), 134–139.Google Scholar
Duffy, G. & Mclntyre, L. A naturalistic study of instructional assistance in primary grade reading. The Elementary School Journal 1982, 83 (1) 15–23.Google Scholar
Durkin, D. What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 1979, 14, 481–533.Google Scholar
Good, T. Teacher effectiveness in the elementary school: What we know about it now. Journal of Teacher Education, 1979, 32 (2), 52–54.Google Scholar
Good, T. Classroom research: What we know and what we need to know. Austin, Texas: The University of Texas at Austin, Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, February, 1982.Google Scholar
Griffin, G., Webb, N. & Confrey, J. Time to learn: Reviews from three perspectives. The Elementary School Journal, 1981, 82, 76–94.Google Scholar
Haring, N. & Bateman, B. Teaching the learning disabled child. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1977.Google Scholar
Roehler, L. & Duffy, G. Classroom teaching is more than opportunity to learn. Journal of Teacher Education, 1981, 32(6), 7–11.Google Scholar
Rosenshine, B. Classroom instruction. In Gage, N. (Ed.), The Psychology of Teaching Methods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Rosenshine, B. Content, time and direct instruction. In Peterson, P. and Walberg, H. (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1979.Google Scholar
Rosenshine, B. & Furst, N. Research in teacher performance, in Smith, B. O. (Ed.) Research in teacher education: a symposium. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall, 1971.Google Scholar
Skillman, L., Garcia, L. & Witcher, C. Direct instruction model implementation manual II Guidebook for supervisors. Follow Through Project, Division of Teacher Education, University of Oregon, Eugene, 1977.Google Scholar