Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:10:32.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving Inclusive Practices in Secondary Schools: Moving from Specialist Support to Supporting Learning Communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Joanne Deppeler ,
Tim Loreman  and
Umesh Sharma
Joanne Deppeler*
Affiliation:
Monash University
Tim Loreman
Affiliation:
Concordia University College of Alberta
Umesh Sharma
Affiliation:
Monash University
*
Joanne Deppeler, Faculty of Education, Monash University, PO Box S, Clayton, Victoria 3800. Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Much of current inclusive education provision in Australian secondary schools relies on ‘specialist’ support from outside the classroom. Students with diverse abilities are placed within the regular classroom and additional specialist services such as therapy, counselling, psychological assessment and special education teaching are required to support their placement. This form of support often relies upon a diagnostic – prescriptive approach where the specialist assumes responsibility for and has a central role in shaping practices. In this paper, we raise issues regarding this model of specialist support in enacting effective inclusive practices in secondary schools. We suggest that one alternative is to shift the focus from the students who are different, to the community of learners in the school. This alternative approach uses collaborative and evidence-based practices to support inclusive ideals and grounds improvement efforts in changes in teachers’ knowledge as well as the cultural and organisational conditions of the school. The purpose of this paper is to prompt further discussion amongst professional community regarding the unique challenges and issues of inclusive practices in secondary schools.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , 2005 , pp. 117 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainscow, M. (1999). Understanding the development of inclusive schools. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2004). Understanding and developing inclusive practices in schools: A collaborative action research network. Working with the Index for inclusion across diverse contexts [Special Issue], The International Journal Of Inclusive Education, 8, 125–139.Google Scholar
Artiles, A. J. (2003). Special Education’s changing identity: Paradoxes and dilemmas in views of culture and space. Harvard Educational Review, 73, 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, T. (2000). Inclusion in education: Participation of disabled learners. Executive summary: Thematic study for the EFA2000 assessment. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Cardno, C. (2002). Team learning: Opportunities and challenges for school leaders. School Leadership and Management, 22, 211–223.Google Scholar
Clarke, C., Dyson, A., Millward, A., & Robson, S. (1999). Theories of inclusion, theories of schools: Deconstructing and reconstructing the ‘inclusive school’. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 157–176.Google Scholar
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305.Google Scholar
Cohen, D., & Hill, H. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102, 294–343.Google Scholar
Comber, B., & Kamler, B. (2004). Getting out of deficit: Pedagogies of reconnection. Teaching Education, 15, 294–310.Google Scholar
Creemers, B. (1994). The effective classroom, London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. (2004). Standards, accountability, and school reform. Teachers College Record, 106, 1047–1085.Google Scholar
Deppeler, J. M. (2004). Learning Improves In Networking Communities (LINC): A university and school system professional development project report. Clayton, Australia: Monash University.Google Scholar
Emihovich, C., & Battaglia, C. (2000). Creating cultures for collaborative inquiry: New challenges for school leaders. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3, 225–238.Google Scholar
Englelbrecht, P. (2004). Changing roles for educational psychologists within inclusive education in South Africa. School Psychology International, 25, 20–29.Google Scholar
Farrell, P., & Kalambouka, A. (2000). Teachers views of school psychologists in different countries. World Go Round, 27, 8–9.Google Scholar
Flores, M. A. (2004). The impact of school culture and leadership on new teachers’ learning in the workplace, International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7, 297–318.Google Scholar
Foreman, P. (2005). Inclusion in action. Victoria, Australia: Thompson, Nelson.Google Scholar
Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform, Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Fullan, M. (2002) The change leader. Educational Leadership, 59, 16–20.Google Scholar
Fullan, M. (2003). The role of leadership in the promotion of knowledge management in schools. In Mackay, T. (Ed.) Leading the education debate: Selected papers from a decade of the IARTV seminar series (pp. 281–290). Jollimont, Victoria: Incorporated Association of Registered Teachers of Victoria (IARTV).Google Scholar
Hargreaves, A. (1992). Cultures of teaching: A focus for change. In Hargreaves, A. & Fullan, M. (Eds.). Understanding teacher development, New York: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
Hemsley-Brown, J., & Sharp, C. (2003). The use of research to improve professional practice: A systematic review of the literature. Oxford Review of Education, 29, 449–470.Google Scholar
Hill, P. (2003). Toward high standards for all students: Victorian research and experience. In Mackay, T. (Ed.) Leading the education debate: Selected papers from a decade of the IARTV seminar series (pp. 186–199), Jollimont, Victoria: Incorporated Association of Registered Teachers of Victoria (IARTV). Google Scholar
Hopkins, D., & Harris, A. (2000). Creating the conditions for teaching and learning, London: Fulton Publishers.Google Scholar
Hord, S. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Lab.Google Scholar
Huffman, D., & Kalnin, J. (2003). Collaborative inquiry to make data-based decisions in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 569–580.Google Scholar
Humphrey, J. C. (2000). Researching disability politics, or some problems with the social model in practice. Disability & Society, 15, 63–85.Google Scholar
Ingvarson, L. (2003). A professional development system fit for a profession. In Mackay, T. (Ed.) Leading the education debate: Selected papers from a decade of the IARTV seminar series (pp. 391–408). Jollimont, Victoria: Incorporated Association of Registered Teachers of Victoria (IARTV).Google Scholar
Jenni, R. W., & Mauriel, J. (2004). Cooperation and collaboration: Reality or rhetoric? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7, 181–195.Google Scholar
Jordon, A. (2001). Special education in Ontario, Canada: A case study of market-based reforms. Cambridge Journal of Education, 31, 349–371.Google Scholar
Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (2000), History, rhetoric and reality: Analysis of the inclusion debate, Remedial and Special Education, 21, 279–296.Google Scholar
Keefe, E. B., & Moore, V. (2004). The challenge of co-teaching in inclusive classrooms at the high school level: What the teachers told us, American Secondary Education, 32, 77–88.Google Scholar
Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loreman, T., & Deppeler, J.M., (2001). Working towards full inclusion in education. Access: The National Issues Journal for People with a Disability, 3(6), 5–8.Google Scholar
Loreman, T., Deppeler, J.M., & Harvey, D.H.P. (2005). Inclusive Education: A practical guide to supporting diversity in the classroom. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Losardo, A., & Notari-Syverson, A. (2001). Alternative approaches to assessing young children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 757–798.Google Scholar
Luke, A., Elkins, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Beyond the middle: A report about literacy and numeracy development of target group students in the middle years of schooling: Vol. 1. Queensland, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training and The University of Queensland.Google Scholar
Marks, H. M., & Louis, L. K. (1999). Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organisational learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 707–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, D. D. (2003). Leading learning: An international perspective on directions. In Mackay, T. (Ed.) Leading the education debate: Selected papers from a decade of the IARTV seminar series (pp. 349–360). Jollimont, Victoria: Incorporated Association of Registered Teachers of Victoria (IARTV).Google Scholar
Marshall, G. (2003). What leaders can do to improve their schools: A framework for school improvement. In Mackay, T. (Ed.) Leading the education debate: Selected papers from a decade of the IARTV seminar series (pp. 291–300). Jollimont, Victoria: Incorporated Association of Registered Teachers of Victoria (IARTV).Google Scholar
McGregor, G., & Vogelsberg, R.T. (1998). Inclusive schooling practices: Pedagogical and research foundations. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Meijer, C. J. W., Pijl, S. J., & Waslander, S. (1999). Special education funding and integration: Cases from Europe. In Parrish, T. B., Chambers, J. G., & Guarino, C.. (Eds.). Funding special education. Nineteenth annual yearbook of the American Education Finance Association. CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. H. (2001). Meyer Report: Review of the program for students with disabilities and impairments. In D.O.E. Office of School Education, Employment and Training. (Ed.). Better services, better outcomes in Victorian government schools: A review of educational services for students with special educational needs (pp 29–45). Melbourne: Victorian Department of Education, Employment and Training.Google Scholar
Mitchell, I. J. (Ed.). (2005). Teaching for effective learning: The complete book of PEEL teaching procedures. Melbourne: PEEL Publishing.Google Scholar
Morrow, R., & Torres, C.A. (2002). Reading Freire and Habermas: Critical pedagogy and transformative social change. NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Moss, J. (2003). Inclusive schooling policy: An educational detective story? The Australian Educational Researcher, 30, 63–81.Google Scholar
Peters, J. (2002). University-school collaboration: Identifying faulty assumptions. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 30, 229–242.Google Scholar
Polloway, E. A., Patton, J. R., Smith, J., & Smith, T. (1996). Historic changes in mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 31, 3–12.Google Scholar
Reschly, D. J. (2004). Commentary: Paradigm shift, outcomes criteria, and behavioral interventions: Foundations for the future of school psychology. School Psychology Review, 33, 408–416.Google Scholar
Rowe, K., Holmes-Smith, P., & Hill, P. (1993, November). The link between school effectiveness research policy and school improvement. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Freemantle, Western Australia.Google Scholar
Rosenau, N. (2002). Individual funding: Flavour of the day or sea change? Policy Research Briefs: Paper 2, August 2002. Melbourne: Disability Foundation of Australia.Google Scholar
Sarason, S. B. (1996). Barometers of change: Individual, educational, and social transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Saunders, L., & Adams, C. (2003). The future of teaching and learning: Towards an agenda for the general teaching council for England. In Mackay, T. (Ed.) Leading the education debate: Selected papers from a decade of the IARTV seminar series (pp. 409–419). Jollimont, Victoria: Incorporated Association of Registered Teachers of Victoria (IARTV).Google Scholar
Senge, P. (2000). The industrial age system of education. In Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (Eds.). A fifth discipline: Schools that learn (pp. 27–58). London: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar
Skrtlc, T. M. (1991). Students with special education needs: Artifacts of the traditional curriculum. In Alnscow, M. (Ed.). Effective schools for all (pp. 20–42). London: Fulton.Google Scholar
Slee, R. (Ed.). (2004). Working with the Index for Inclusion over diverse contexts [Special Issue], International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8 (2), 123–124.Google Scholar
Slee, R., & Allan, J. (2001). Excluding the included: A reconsideration of inclusive education. International Studies in the Sociology of Education, 11(2), 173–191.Google Scholar
Smylie, M. (1994). Redesigning teachers’ work: Connections to the classroom. In Darling-Hammond, L. (Ed.). Review of research in education, Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Supovitz, J. A., & Mayer, D. P. (2000). Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice: The longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reform. Educational Policy, 14, 331–359.Google Scholar
Tschannen-Moren, M., Uline, C., Woolfolk, H.A., & Mackley, T. (2000). Creating smarter schools through collaboration. Journal of Educational Administration, 38, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on special education needs. Paris: United Nations.Google Scholar
Vaughn, S., Klingner, J., & Hughes, M. (2000). Sustalnability of research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 66, 163–171.Google Scholar
Visscher, A. J., & Witziers, B. (2004). Subject departments as professional communities? British Educational Research Journal, 30, 785–800.Google Scholar
West, M., Alnscow, M., & Stanford, J. (2005). Sustaining Improvement in schools in challenging circumstances: A study of successful practice. School Leadership and Management, 25, 77–93.Google Scholar
Zech, L. K., & Gause-Vega, C. L. (2000). Content-based collaborative inquiry: A professional development model for sustaining educational reform. Educational Psychologist, 35, 207–217.Google Scholar