Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:03:49.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Student Focussed Teacher Inservice on the Progress of Mainstreamed Kindergarten Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Ivy Green  and
Coral Kemp
Ivy Green
Affiliation:
Macquarie University Special Education Centre
Coral Kemp*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University Special Education Centre
*
Address for: Coral Kemp, Macquarie Special Education Centre, Ryda NSW 2112.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A quasi‐experimental matched pre‐test, post‐test control group design was used to investigate the impact of individual student focussed teacher inservice on the progress of students with disabilities enrolled in mainstream kindergarten classes. Twelve student pairs in one district of the NSW Department of Education and Training were matched on pre‐test scores collected at the end of the term prior to kindergarten entry. The kindergarten teachers of each student pair were assigned to a training and non‐training group. Teachers in the training group were involved in a 2 day inservice training program which focussed on the assessed needs of the students with disabilities in their classes. Teachers in both groups were surveyed to gauge their perceptions of the support they received in the identified students’ transitions to school and of their efforts to include the students. The students were reassessed at the end of kindergarten. Although the students as a whole made gains in all areas assessed, there were no statistically significant differences in the post‐test scores of the students in the classes of the teachers in the training versus the non‐training group. The implications of these findings and the results of the teacher survey are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , 1999 , pp. 158 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algozzine, B., & Ysseldyke, J., & Campbell, P. (1994). Strategies and tactics for effective instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 26, 34–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, W., & Bandy, H. (1993, October). The impact of students with special needs on rural teachers in British Columbia. Paper presented at National Rural Educators Association Convention, Burlington, Vermont. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 366 487).Google Scholar
Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1993). Recognition phoneme invariance by beginning readers: confounding effects of global similarity. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 315–324.Google Scholar
Carlberg, C., & Kavale, K. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 14, 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center, Y., Ward, J., & Ferguson, C. (1991). Towards an index to evaluate the integration of children with disabilities into regular classes. Educational Psychology, 11, 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee of Review of New South Wales Schools (1989). Report of the committee of review of New South Wales schools. Sydney: Author (the ‘Carrick Report’).Google Scholar
Commonwealth Project of National Significance - Special Education (1993). Including students with disabilities in regular classrooms. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.Google Scholar
Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1997). PPVT-III Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Third Edition. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service, Inc.Google Scholar
Giangreco, M., Dennis, R., Cloninger, C., Edelman, S., & Schattman, R. (1993). “I’ve counted Jon”: Transformational experiences of teachers educating students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 359–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, I., & Kemp, C. (1998). Transition: Support issues for teachers integrating young children with disabilities into mainstream classes. Special Education Perspectives, 7, 4–16.Google Scholar
Hollowood, T.M., Salisbury, C.L., Rainforth, B., & Palombaro, M.M. (1994). Use of instructional time in classrooms serving students with and without severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 61 242–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huck, S., & Cormier, W. (1996). Reading statistics and research. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.Google Scholar
Hudson, A., & Clunies-Ross, G. (1984). A study of the integration of children with intellectual handicaps into regular schools. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 10, 165–177.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, J., & Gow, L. (1989). Integration in Australia: A research perspective. Australian Journal of Education, 33, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, C. (1997). Teacher interview form used in 1997 transition research. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Kemp, C. (1998). Quality enhancement grant report. The transition of children from early intervention services into regular schools. Early Links. The Newsletter of MUSEC Early Intervention Network, No. 1, p.4. Google Scholar
Kemp, C., Murphy, M., & Driscoll, C. (1995). Transition from early intervention to school: An exercise in collaborative planning. In Communicating “Now We’re Really Talking”. 12th State Conference Papers of the Australian Early Intervention Association (NSW Chapter) INC.Google Scholar
Klein, N. & Sheehan, R. (1987). Staff development: A key issue in meeting the needs of young handicapped children in day care centres. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 7,13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsky, D. & Gartner, A. (1995). The evaluation of inclusive education programs. NCERI Bulletin, 2, 2-8. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 385 042).Google Scholar
McDonnell, A., & Hardman, M. (1989). The desegregation of America’s special schools; Strategies for change. JASH, 14, 68–74.Google Scholar
McRae, D. (1996). The integration / inclusion feasibility study. Sydney: NSW Department of School Education.Google Scholar
Maxwell, T. (1993). Support structures for inschoot professional development. The Practising Administrator, 15, 30–33.Google Scholar
Mok, M., & Wheldall, K. (1995). Some reservations about the use of the analysis of covariance in educational research: A response to Dugard and Todman. Educational Psychology, 15, 199–201.Google Scholar
Muir, G. (1991). A review of the key issues in integration for the NSW Department of School Education. Unpublished.Google Scholar
NSW Department of School Education (1997). Enrolment of students in government schools: A summary and consolidation of policy. Sydney: Executive Services Directorate.Google Scholar
NSW Department of School Education (1997). Transition to school for young children with special learning needs. Sydney: Special Education Directorate.Google Scholar
O’Neil, J. (1995). Can inclusion work? A conversation with Jim Kauffman and Mara Sapon-Shevin. Educational Leadership, 42, 7–11.Google Scholar
Pieterse, M., & Center, Y. (1984). The integration of eight Down’s syndrome children into regular schools. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 10, 11–20.Google Scholar
Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In Wittrock, M.C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 376–391). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sapon-Shevin, M. (1987). The national education reports and special education: Implications for students. Exceptional Children, 53, 300–306.Google Scholar
Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. (1996). Teacher perceptions of mainstreaming/inclusion, 1958-1995: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 63, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. (1995). Responsible inclusion for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 264–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, F., & Thompson, S. (1993). Assumptions about staff development based on research and best practice. Journal of Staff Development, 14, 52–57.Google Scholar
Yates, G., & Yates, S. (1990). Teacher effectiveness research: Towards describing user-friendly classroom instruction. Educational Psychology, 10, 225–238.Google Scholar