Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T09:54:10.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Edu-Kinesthetics: Fact or fiction? A preliminary Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Rosalind Murray-Harvey*
Affiliation:
South Australian College of Advanced Education, Sturt Campus

Abstract

Edu-Kinesthetics or Educational Kinesiology (E.K.), is becoming increasingly popular as an intervention treatment for children with learning difficulties. This paper reviews the claims of E.K. in the light of concepts and findings from contemporary neuropsychological and learning disabilities literature suggesting caution is needed in accepting claims for the success of E.K. without supporting research data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benson, D.F. & Zaidel, E. (Eds.). (1985). The dual brain: Hemispheric specialization in humans. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, W. (1986).An interview with Paul and Gail Dennison. S.A.N.E.T. Glen Osmond, S.A.: The E.K. Learning Centre.Google Scholar
Corballis, M.C. (1980). Laterality and myth. American Psychologist, 5, 284195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, R.A. (1988). The neurologically impaired child: Doman-Delacato techniques reappraised. London: Croom-Helm.Google Scholar
Dennison, P.E. (1981). Switching on: A guide to Edu-Kinesthetics. Glendale, CA: Edu-Kinesthetics.Google Scholar
Dennison, P.E., & Hargrove, G. (1985a). Personalized whole brain integration, deridale, CA: Edu-Kinesthetics.Google Scholar
Dennison, P.E., & Hargrove, G. (1985b). E.K. for kids. Glendale, CA: Edu-Kinesthetics.Google Scholar
Dennison, P.E., & Dennison, G.E. (1986). Brain gym: Simple activities for whole brain learning. Glendale, CA: Edu-Kinesthetics.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, A.W., & Young, A.W. (1988). Human Cognitive neuropsychology. Hove, U.K.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gaddes, W.H. (1985). Learning disabilities and brain function: A neuropsychological approach (2nd ed.), New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiscock, M., & Kinsbourne, M. (1987). Specialization of the cerebral hemispheres: Implications for learning. Journal of Learning Disablities, 20, 130–143.Google ScholarPubMed
Joseph, R. (1988). The right cerebral hemisphere: Emotion, music, visual-spatial skills, body image, dreams, and awareness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 630–673.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalsa, G.K., & Sifft, J.M. (1987, April). The effects of Educational Kinesiology upon the static balance of learning disabled boys and girls. Paper presented at the National Convention of the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I.Q. (1985). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (2nd ed.). New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Lester, F.K. & Garofalo, J. (1987, April). The influence of affects, beliefs, and metacognition on problem solving behavior: Some tentative speculations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Lindsey, J. (1984). Balancing the mind/body for reading writing learning in special education. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
McGregor, T. (1987).E.K. at school. E.K. Centre News, No. 7, March. Glen Osmond, S.A.: E.K. Learning Centre.Google Scholar
Milberg, W. (1988).Representation, control and interaction: What would a theory of right-hemisphere lexical semantics look like? In Chiarello, C. (Ed.), Right hemisphere contributions to lexical semantics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Morrison, D.C. (1985). Neurobehavioral and perceptual dysfunction in learning disabled children. New York: CJ. Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Newell, D., & Rugel, R.P. (1981).Hemispheric specialization in normal and disabled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 296297.Google Scholar
Nicholson, T. (1982). A review of the Doman-Delacato ‘Patterning’ method. Adelaide: Research & Planning Branch, S.A. Education Department.Google Scholar
Nord, L. (1984). An investigation into the effects of Edu-Kinesthetics on the performance of reading disabled elementary grade boys: A pilot study. Unpublished manuscript. Kristiansand, Norway.Google Scholar
Ottoson, D. (Ed.). (1987). Duality and unity of the brain. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Powers, H.W.S. (1977). A reply to Robert L. Sieben’s critique. Academic Therapy, 13, 197203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochlitz, S. (1987).Is TFH scientific? Is western medicine? A physicist’s view. E.K. Centre News, No.8, June. Glen Osmond, S.A.: E.K. Learning Centre.Google Scholar
Scarborough, C. (1988). E.K. in schools. E.K. Centre News, No. 13, September. Glen Osmond, S.A.: E.K. Learning Centre.Google Scholar
Sieben, R.L. (1977). Controversial medical treatments of learning disabilities. Academic Therapy, 13, 133147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, L.B. (1987). The “Magic Cure”: A review of the current controversial approaches for treating learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 498504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Springer, S.P., & Deutsch, G. (1985). Left brain, right brain (rev. ed.), New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Summerfield, L. (Ed.). (1985). E.K. at school. S.A.N.E.T. Newsletter, September.Google Scholar
Summerfield, B. (Ed). (1986). E.K. Centre News, December. Glen Osmond, S.A.: E.K. Learning Centre.Google Scholar
Thie., J.F. (1979). Touch f or health (rev. ed.). Marina del Rey, CA: DeVorss.Google Scholar
Whetton, P. (1987).Report from an adaptive remedial teacher in a metropolitan high school. E.K. Centre News, No. 9, September. Glen Osmond, S.A.: E.K. Learning Centre.Google Scholar