Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:13:45.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Not Taking it Personally”: “Performing” the Teacher’s “Role” and Responding to Challenging Behaviours

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Gwyn Symonds
Gwyn Symonds*
Affiliation:
Rowland Hassall School for Specific Purposes, Department of Education and Training, New South Wales University of Sydney, New South Wales
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be Addressed to : Gwyn Symonds. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper views the teacher’s role as “performance,”; as Acting theory defines it. This paradigm for teacher reflection allows practitioners working with students with challenging behaviours to mark out a space in which to operate where teacher response can avoid negative emotionalism, stress and personalisation of conflict with the student. This approach recognises that there is a “role”; that is played by teachers which is both professional and adopted, separate from the sense of self and personal identity that can be wounded by student oppositional behaviour, particularly if it is abusive. Being alert to aspects of performing that role enables teacher response to challenging behaviours to be de-personalised, thus increasing the teacher’s sense of self-efficacy, the effectiveness of interventions that defuse oppositional behaviour and effective student learning. Some of the delivery techniques of the craft of acting (body awareness, tone, breathing), and the concepts of the classroom as “stage”; and positive reinforcement as “script”; are discussed to assist teachers to bridge the gap between knowledge of the skills of positive reinforcement and positive correction and their implementation. The paradigm under discussion has been developed from my own professional experience in ED/BD classes, from imparting training and development on de-stressing the management of challenging behaviours to teachers and teaching assistants, as well as to practicum students under my supervision, and from the delivery of parent education courses to parents of students with oppositional behaviours. The methodological comparison between aspects of Acting theory and the performance of teaching is offered as an aid to enhance a professional, calm, and astute approach to the implementation of positive reinforcement and positive correction techniques. The use of Acting theory enables a professional mind shift for teacher reflection so that negative stimuli to student behaviour problems from teacher responses can be avoided.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 2003 , pp. 29 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberto, P., & Troutman, A. (2003). Applied behavior analysis for teachers. (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Merrill.Google Scholar
Billingsley, B., Pyecha, J., Smith-Davis, J., Murray, K., & Hendricks, M. (1995). Improving the retention of special education teachers. Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 379860).Google Scholar
Blake, C., & Gamer, P. (2000). We may give advice but we can never prompt behaviour: Lessons from Britain in teaching students whose behaviour causes concern. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 442209).Google Scholar
Blum, P. (1998). Surviving and succeeding in difficult classrooms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, K. (2000). Classroom strategies for students with behaviour disorders. Katoomba N.S.W: Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (1999). Teacher burnout, perceived self-efficacy in classroom management and student disruptive behaviour in secondary education. Curriculum and Teaching 14(2), 7–26.Google Scholar
Cavin, C. (1998). Maintaining sanity in an insane classroom: How a teacher of students with emotional disturbances can keep from becoming an emotionally disturbed teacher. Education and Treatment of Children, 2, 370–384.Google Scholar
Cooper, P., Smith, C., & Upton, G. (1994). Emotional and behavioural difficulties: Theory to practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Corrie, L. (2002). Investigating troublesome classroom behaviour: Practical tools for teachers. London & New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
Cullinan, D. (2002). Students with emotional and behavior disorders: An introduction for teachers and other helping professionals. NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall Google Scholar
Evans, D. (2001) Editorial. The Australasian Journal of Special Educatlon, 25, p. 3.Google Scholar
Finn, P. (1999). Literacy with an attitude. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
Fo, D. (1991). Tricks of the trade. (Farrell, J., Trans.) London: Methuen Drama.Google Scholar
Gardill, M., DuPaul, G., & Kyle, K. (1996). Classroom strategies for managing students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Intervention in School and Clinic, 32, 206–212.Google Scholar
Homer, R. (1997). Behavioural support for students with severe disabilities: Functional assessment and comprehensive intervention. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 84–104.Google Scholar
Houseman, B. (2002). Finding your voice: A step-by-step guide for actors. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Izard, J., & Evans, J. (Eds) (1996). Student behaviour: Policies, interventions and evaluations: Selected papers from the 1996 national conference on behaviour management and behaviour change of children and youth with emotional and/or behaviour problems. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).Google Scholar
Kaiser, B., & Rasminsky, J. (2003). Challenging behaviour: Understanding, preventing, and responding effectively. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
Kamps, D. & Tankersley, M. (1996) Prevention of behavioural and conduct disorders: Trends and research issues. Behavioural Disorders, 22, 41–48.Google Scholar
Kirby, M. (2002). On acting and not acting. In Zarilli, P.B. (Ed.), Acting (re)considered: A theoretical and practical guide, (2nd ed., pp. 40–52). London & New York: Routledge,Google Scholar
Konijn, E. (2001). The actor’s emotions reconsidered: A psychological task-based perspective. In Zarilli, P.B. (Ed.), Acting (re)considered: A theoretical and practical guide, (2nd ed.), (pp. 62–81). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Konza, D., Grainger, J., & Bradshaw, K. (2001). Classroom management: A survival guide. Katoomba N.S.W: Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Lane, K., Gresham, F., & O’Shaughnessy, T. (2002). Interventions for children with or at risk for emotional and behavioural disorders. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Luckhurst, M., & Veltman, C. (2001). On acting: Interviews with actors. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Maag, J. (2001). Rewarded by punishment: Reflections on the disuse of positive reinforcement in education. Exceptional Children, 67, 173–186.Google Scholar
Macauley, A. (2003). Don’t tell me, show me. Sydney: Currency Press.Google Scholar
Marchel, C. (2002). Job stress in perspective: Behavioral disabilities, teachers and student aggression. Boone, NC. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 470523).Google Scholar
Martin, A., Linfoot, K., & Stephenson, J. (1999). How teachers respond to concerns about misbehaviour in their classroom, Psychology in the Schools, 36, 347–358.Google Scholar
Mitter, S. (1992). Systems of rehearsal: Stanislavsky, Brecht, Grotowski and Brook. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nelson, J., Maculan, A., Roberts, M., & Ohlund, B. (2001). Sources of occupational stress for teachers of students with emotional and behavioural disorders, Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9, 123–130.Google Scholar
Olsen, J., & Cooper, P. (2001). Dealing with disruptive students in the classroom. London: Times Educational Supplement, Kogan Page.Google Scholar
O’Neill, R., Homer, R., Albin, R., Sprague, J., Storey, K., & Newton, J. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavour: A practical handbook.(2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.Google Scholar
Parsons, L. (2002). Current trends in the management of emotional and behavioural difficulties. In Rogers, B. (Ed.), Teacher leadership and behaviour management, (pp. 102–112). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
Richmond, C. (2002). Behaviour management: A no-friils approach, Professional Educator, 1, 6–7.Google Scholar
Rodenburg, P. (1997). The actor speaks: Voice and the performer. London: Methuen Drama.Google Scholar
Rogers, B. (1994). Managing behaviour: Positive correction [Video]. Australia: Quartas Productions Google Scholar
Rogers, B. (1998). Cracking the hard class: Strategies for managing the harder than average class. Sydney: Scholastic.Google Scholar
Rogers, B. (2002a). Asking questions in a discipline context, Classroom, 22(32), 28–29.Google Scholar
Rogers, B. (2002b). Teacher leadership and behaviour management. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
Rogers, B. (2002c). What changes and what stays the same in behaviour management? In Rogers, B. (Ed.), Teacher leadership and behaviour management, (pp. 4–19). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
Rogers, B. (2003). Should we Ignore bad behaviour? Classroom, 23(1), 22–23.Google Scholar
Shores, R., Gunter, P., Denny, R., & Jack, S. (1993). Classroom influences on aggressive and disruptive behaviours of students with emotional and behavioural disorders, Focus on Exceptional Children, 26, 1–10.Google Scholar
Shores, R., & Wehby, J. (1999). Analyzing the classroom social behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 7, 194–199.Google Scholar
Simmons, D., & Kameenui, E. (1996). A focus on curriculum design: When children fail. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28, 1–16.Google Scholar
Singh, K., & Billingsley, B. (1996). Intent to stay in teaching: Teachers of students with emotional disorders versus other special educators. Remedial and Special Educations 7, 37–47.Google Scholar
Smith, G. (1999). Local emotions, global moods , and film structure. In Plantinga, C. & Smith, G.M. (Eds) Baltimore: Passionate views: Film, cognition and emotion. Baltimore & London: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sonenberg, J. (1996). The actor speaks: Twenty-four actors talk about process and technique. New York: Crown Trade Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Stephenson, J., Linfoot, K., & Martin, A. (2000). How teachers of young children respond to problem behaviour in the classroom, Australasian Journal of Special Education, 24, 21–31.Google Scholar
Sugai, G., & Lewis, T. (1996). Preferred and promising practices for social skills instruction. Focus on Exceptional Children, 29, 1–22.Google Scholar
Thomson, P. 2002). Schooling the rustbelt kids: Making a difference in changing times. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Wagener, G. (2001). Safe and effective schools: Combatting behavioural problems through good practice, Practising Administrator, 23(1), 20–21.Google Scholar
Wanjura, C. (2000). Teacher perceptions regarding inclusion of children with behavioural and emotional disorders in their classrooms. In Sydney 2000 papers and abstracts [computer-file] Conference of the Australian Association for Research and Education, 4th-7th December 2000. Melbourne. Australian Association for Research in Education. Retrieved November 12, 2003 from http://www.aare.edu.au/00pap/wan00469.htm Google Scholar
Woodward, K. (2002). Understanding identity. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Welch, M., & Sheridan, S. (1995). Educational partnerships: Serving students at risk. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
Zarrilli, P. (2002). On the edge of breath, looking: Cultivating the actor’s bodymind through Asian martial/arts meditation.” In Zarilli, P.B., Ed. Acting (re)considered: A theoretical and practical guide (2nd ed., pp. 181–99). London & New York. Routledge.Google Scholar