Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:38:57.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of Inclusive Education: The Reality of Professional Experience Placements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2020

Kerry Therese Aprile  and
Bruce Allen Knight
Kerry Therese Aprile
Affiliation:
Central Queensland University, Australia
Bruce Allen Knight*
Affiliation:
Central Queensland University, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Developing the knowledge and practical skills for implementing inclusive education is a legislative and policy imperative for contemporary graduate teachers. In this qualitative study, the authors investigated the experiences of 18 preservice teachers during their practical school placements in primary and secondary school settings and the impact of these experiences on their attitudes towards students with special needs and their readiness to teach in mainstream inclusive settings. Sixteen of the participants had completed 2 or more placements. Data were collected using semistructured interviews and analysed to categorise the observed and enacted practices and define themes that contribute to a deeper understanding of preservice teachers’ learning about inclusion through their practice in schools. The 4 identified themes show that contact, responsibility for instruction, modelled practices, and expectations for student learning all have significant impacts on the quality and outcomes of preservice teachers’ placements. Findings suggest that placement settings do not consistently represent contexts where aspiring teachers are exposed to the types of meaningful contact or successful experiences claimed to be fundamental preparation for inclusive practice. The implications for the preservice teachers themselves and for their future practice are discussed.

Keywords

preservice teachersinclusionattitudespractice
Type
Original Articles
Information
Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , December 2020 , pp. 88 - 101
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

This manuscript was accepted under the Editorship of Umesh Sharma.

References

Arthur-Kelly, M., Sutherland, D., Lyons, G., Macfarlane, S., & Foreman, P. (2013). Reflections on enhancing pre-service teacher education programmes to support inclusion: Perspectives from New Zealand and Australia. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28, 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2013.778113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2019). Student diversity. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/resources/student-diversity/ Google Scholar
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2011). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/teach/standards Google Scholar
Bannister-Tyrrell, M., Mavropoulou, S., Jones, M., Bailey, J., O’Donnell-Ostini, A., & Dorji, R. (2018). Initial teacher preparation for teaching students with exceptionalities: Pre-service teachers’ knowledge and perceived competence. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(6), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n6.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beacham, N., & Rouse, M. (2012). Student teachers’ attitudes and beliefs about inclusion and inclusive practice. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12, 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01194.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burn, K., Mutton, T., & Hagger, H. (2017). Towards a principled approach for school-based teacher educators: Lessons from research. In Peters, M. A., Cowie, B., & Menter, I. (Eds.), A companion to research in teacher education (pp. 105–120). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4075-7_7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrington, S., MacArthur, J., Kearney, A., Kimber, M., Mercer, L., Morton, M., & Rutherford, G. (2012). Towards an inclusive education for all. In Carrington, S. & MacArthur, J. (Eds.), Teaching in inclusive school communities (pp. 3–38). Milton, Australia: Wiley.Google Scholar
Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. London, UK: SAGE.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia. (2006). Disability standards for education 2005. Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2005L00767/Download Google Scholar
Forlin, C., Loreman, T., Sharma, U., & Earle, C. (2009). Demographic differences in changing pre-service teachers’ attitudes, sentiments and concerns about inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13, 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110701365356 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education: Interaction and practice. London, UK: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209670 Google Scholar
Gigante, J., & Gilmore, L. (2018). Australian preservice teachers’ attitudes and perceived efficacy for teaching in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1545875 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Hamman, D., Lechtenberger, D., Griffin-Shirley, N., & Zhou, L. (2013). Beyond exposure to collaboration: Preparing general-education teacher candidates for inclusive practice. The Teacher Educator, 48, 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2013.796030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, I., & Woodcock, S. (2015). Inclusive education policies: Discourses of difference, diversity and deficit. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19, 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2014.908965 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemmings, B., & Woodcock, S. (2011). Preservice teachers’ views of inclusive education: A content analysis. Australian Journal of Special Education, 35, 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajse.35.2.103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskin, J., Boyle, C., & Anderson, J. (2015). Inclusive education in pre-schools: Predictors of pre-service teacher attitudes in Australia. Teachers and Teaching, 21, 974–989. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1005867 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jobling, A., & Moni, K. B. (2004). ‘I never imagined I’d have to teach these children’: Providing authentic learning experiences for secondary pre-service teachers in teaching students with special needs. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866042000206026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loreman, T. (2010). A content-infused approach to pre-service teacher preparation for inclusive education. In Forlin, C. (Ed.), Teacher education for inclusion: Changing paradigms and innovative approaches (pp. 56–64). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (2005). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). South Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mergler, A., Carrington, S., Kimber, M., & Bland, D. (2016). Inclusive values: Exploring the perspectives of pre-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n4.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Retrieved from http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/National_Declaration_on_the_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf Google Scholar
Peebles, J. L., & Mendaglio, S. (2014). The impact of direct experience on preservice teachers’ self-efficacy for teaching in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18, 1321–1336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2014.899635 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, U., Forlin, C., & Loreman, T. (2008). Impact of training on pre-service teachers’ attitudes and concerns about inclusive education and sentiments about persons with disabilities. Disability and Society, 23, 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590802469271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangen, D., & Beutel, D. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of self as inclusive educators. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1184327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group (TEMAG). (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Canberra, ACT: Department of Education. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au Google Scholar
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/SALAMA_E.PDF Google Scholar
Varcoe, L., & Boyle, C. (2014). Pre-service primary teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education. Educational Psychology, 34, 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.785061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfensberger, W. (1995). An “if this, then that” formulation of decisions related to social role valorization as a better way of interpreting it to people. Mental Retardation, 33, 163–169.Google Scholar
Woodcock, S., & Reupert, A. (2016). Inclusion, classroom management and teacher self-efficacy in an Australian context. In Garvis, S. & Pendergast, D. (Eds.), Asia-Pacific perspectives on teacher self-efficacy (pp. 87–102). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-521-0_6 Google Scholar
Woodcock, S., & Vialle, W. (2016). An examination of pre-service teachers’ attributions for students with specific learning difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar