Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-q9hcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-10T19:16:45.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

China, Rice, and GMOs: Navigating the Global Rift on Genetic Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2025

Ron Herring
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A recent article in Nature asked provocatively: Is China ready for GM rice? The title reflects widely shared anxiety over genetic engineering in agriculture. The use of the term “GM” specifically conjures a politically charged object: “GMOs” or “genetically modified organisms.” Is anyone ready for FrankenFoods? Strawberries with fish genes? Human cloning? The question has an ominous overtone, though both reporter and venue are identified with science. The question derives its energy from the decision of the Chinese Government to go full speed ahead with genetically engineered rice to confront what the state constructs as a gathering Malthusian crisis of hunger. What the article does not tell the reader is that the farmers are way ahead of the government: ready and able. Transgenic rice – officially unauthorized within China – has for several years been showing up in exports from China to Europe, to Japan, to New Zealand – and probably many other places that simply are not checking.

Type
Research Article
Information
Asia-Pacific Journal , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , January 2009 , e2
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

References

Barboza, D. 2003, “Development of Biotech Crops is Booming in Asia,” New York Times, February 21. p A3.Google Scholar
Batista, Rita, Saibo, Nelson, Lourenc, Tiago, and Oliveira, Maria Margarida. 2008 “Microarray analyses reveal that plant mutagenesis may induce more transcriptomic changes than transgene insertion.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science March 4. 2008 vol. 105 no. 9.Google ScholarPubMed
Bouis, H. 2007. “The Potential of Genetically Modified Food Crops to Improve Human Nutrition in Developing Countries.” Journal of Development Studies vol 43 No 1.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. I. 2005. “Poor nations turn to publicly developed GM crops.” Nature Biotechnology, 23(1), Pp. 27–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EB64.3 2006 “Europeans and Biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and Trends,” A report to the European Commission's Directorate-General for Research. Final report on Eurobarometer 64.3. EU Commission. Brussels. Government of India, 2001 Ministry of Science and Technology, Department of Biotechnology, Biotechnology: A Vision. New Delhi.Google Scholar
Herring, RJ 2007a. “The Genomics Revolution and Development Studies: Science, Politics and Poverty,” Journal of Development Studies vol 43 No 1.Google Scholar
Herring, RJ 2007b. Stealth Seeds: Biosafety, Bioproperty, Biopolitics.” Journal of Development Studies. vol 43 No 1.Google Scholar
Herring, RJ 2007c Suicide Seeds? Biotechnology Meets the Developmental State. India in Transition. Center for the Advanced Study of India University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Herring, RJ 2008 “Opposition to Transgenic Technologies: Ideology, Interests, and Collective Action Frames,” Nature Reviews Genetics London. Nature Publishing Group vol 9 June 2008.Google ScholarPubMed
Herring, RJ ms Cognitive Blockages, Politics, and Adaptability: Fallout from the Great EU U-Turn, For the workshop “Politics of Adaptation to Environmental Challenges in South Asia in the 21st Century” Oslo, Norway. November 6–9.Google Scholar
Huang, J. and Hu, R. 2008. Genetically modified rice, yields, and pesticides: Assessing Farm Level productivity effects in china. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 56(2), 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J., Pray, C. and Rozell, S. 2002. Enhancing the crops to feed the poor. Nature 418: 678–684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, J., Roselle, S., Pray, C.E., and Wang, Q. 2002. “Plant Biotechnology in China” Science 295: pp 674–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haung, J., Hu, Ruifa, Fan, Cuihui, Pray, Carl E., and Rozelle, Scott. “Bt Cotton Benefits, Costs, and Impacts in China,” Agbioforum, Vol. 5, No. 4 (2002), Pp. 153–166.Google Scholar
Huang, J. and Wang, Q. 2002. Agricultural Biotechnology Development and Policy in China. AgBioForum, 5(4): 122–135.Google Scholar
James, C. 2002. Global Review of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 2001 Feature: Bt Cotton. ISAAA Briefs No. 26. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Pray, C.E., Huang, J., Hu, R., and Rozelle, S.. 2002. Five Years of Bt Cotton in China – the Benefits Continue. The Plant Journal 31 (4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naim, Moises. 2005. Illicit: How Smugglers, Traffickers and Copycats are Hijacking the Global Economy. New York: Doubleday.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paarlberg, R. L. 2008. Starved for Science: How Biotechnology is Being Kept Out of Africa. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinstrup-Anderson, Per and Schioler, Ebbe. 2000. Seeds of Contention: World Hunger and the Global Controversy over GM Crops. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Weighardt, F. 2006. European GMO labeling thresholds impractical and unscientific Nature Biotechnology 24, 23–25 (2006) doi: 10.1038/nbt0106-23b.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winston, M. 2002. Travels in Genetically Modified Zone. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar