Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-q9hcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-10T20:08:19.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can Economic Theory Demystify North Korea?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2025

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The starting point of this paper is the assumption that North Korea is de facto a well-defined nation-state, home to a national economy and inhabited by individuals that bear the same basic economic and social characteristics as individuals elsewhere. Despite the obvious specifics of the economic system and institutional structure of the country, standard economic theory should be applicable to the question of North Korean economic development. The article seeks to prove this as broadly as possible, showing that economic theory as diverse as classical and neoclassical, Marxist, Keynesian, institutional, developmentalist, neo-liberal or structuralist, dependency analysis-based and many others, including regionally centered approaches, can be utilized to explain the North Korean case with useful results, although the latter will inevitably vary depending on the chosen framework. Without arguing against or in favor of any of the available theoretical methods, this article advocates further research on North Korea as another case of development in East Asia, rather than as a mystical exception to the rule. This is particularly important in light of the tendency to describe North Korea as unpredictable, bizarre, and incomprehensible. This is clearly not the case.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2007

References

Amsden, Alice. Asia's New Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Ayres, Clarence. “Economic Development: An Institutionalist Perspective,” in Dietz, James ed.): Latin America's Economic Development, London and Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999: 8997.Google Scholar
Ayres, Clarence E.The Co-ordinates of Institutionalism,” in American Economic Review XLI, May 1951: 4755.Google Scholar
Balaam, David N., and Veseth, Michael. Readings in International Political Economy, Prentice Hall, 1996.Google Scholar
Balassa, Bela. The Newly Industrializing Countries in the World Economy, Elmsford (N.Y.): Pergamon Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Baran, Paul. The Political Economy of Growth, New York: Monthly Review Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Blanchard, Olivier. The Economics of Post-Communist Transition, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchill, Scott et al. Theories of International Relations, London: Palgrave, 2001.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrigue and Faletto, Enzo. Dependency and Development in Latin America, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. “Force and Opinion,” in Z Magazine, July-August 1991,.Google Scholar
Cypher, James M. and Dietz, James L.. The Process of Economic Development, New York and London: Routledge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Xiaoping. We Can Develop a Market Economy under Socialism, interview with Gibney, Frank B., Nov. 26, 1979.Google Scholar
Dixon, Chris. “State, Party, and Political Change in Vietnam,” in McCargo, Duncan (ed.): Rethinking Vietnam, London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004: 1526.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Tim. “Industrialization in Vietnam: Social Change and Environment in Transitional Developing Countries,” in Auty, Richard M. and Brown, Katrina (eds.): Approaches to Sustainable Development, London: Pinter, 1997: 247267.Google Scholar
Frank, Andre Gunder. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America, New York: Monthly Review Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Frank, Andre Gunder. Underdevelopment or Revolution, New York: Monthly Review Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Frank, Ruediger. Die DDR und Nordkorea: Der Wiederaufbau der Stadt Hamhùng 1954-1962, Aachen: Shaker, 1996.Google Scholar
Frank, Ruediger. “The End of Socialism and a Wedding Gift for the Groom? The True Meaning of the Military First Policy,” in NAPSNET Special Report and DPRK Briefing Book, 2003,.Google Scholar
Frank, Ruediger. “The Political System of North Korea,” in Kern, Thomas and Köllner, Patrick (Eds., 2005). South and North Korea: An Introduction to History, Politics, Economy and Society, Frankfurt and New York: Campus, 2005a: 216234.Google Scholar
Frank, Ruediger. “Economic Reforms in North Korea (1998-2004): Systemic Restrictions, Quantitative Analysis, Ideological Background,” in Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy (Routledge), 10(3), 2005b: 278311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Ruediger. “Food Aid to North Korea or How to Ride a Trojan Horse to Death,” in Nautilus Institute Policy Forum Online 05-75 A, 13.09.2005c,.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man, New York: Free Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Ghatak, Subrata: Introduction to Development Economics, London and New York: Routledge, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Noland, Marcus. Hunger and Human Rights: The Politics of Famine in North Korea, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, 2005.Google Scholar
Hahn, Erich. Historischer Materialismus und marxistische Soziologie, Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1968.Google Scholar
Heberer, Thomas. “Das Politische System der VR China im Prozess des Wandels,” in Derichs, Claudia and Heberer, Thomas (eds.): Einführung in die Politischen Systeme Ostasiens, Opladen: Leske und Budrich, 2003.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. The Strategy of Economic Development, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O.The rise and decline of development economics,” in Essays in Trespassing: Economics to Politics and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael and Meckling, William. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3, 1976: 305360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, Yeonsik. “The Rise of State Corporatism in Vietnam.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 19, 1997: 153171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Zemin: Speech at the Party School of the Communist Party of China, 2002.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorganson, John. “Tan'gun and the Legitimization of a Threatened Dynasty: North Korea's Rediscovery of Tan'gun.” Korea Observer XXVII/2, 1996: 273306.Google Scholar
Kane, Anthony J. (ed.). China Briefing 1989, Boulder, San Francisco, and London: Westview Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Kern, William S. (ed.). From Socialism to Market Economy: The Transition Problem, Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Daejung. “Is Culture Destiny? The Myth of Asia's Anti-Democratic Values.” Foreign Affairs, November/December 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Ilsung. On Eliminating Dogmatism and Formalism and Establishing Juche in Ideological Work, Pyeongyang: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1973.Google Scholar
Kim, Jongil. Let us defend our Style of Socialism and Exalt its Brilliance under the Banner of the Juche Idea, Talk with the Senior Officials of the Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea, January 21, 1990.Google Scholar
Kim, Jongil. Giving Priority to Ideological Work is Essential for Accomplishing Socialism, P'yóngyang, June 19, 1995.Google Scholar
Kim, Jongil. “On Preserving the Juche Character and National Character of the Revolution and Construction,” in The People's Korea, 06.05.1998,.Google Scholar
Kim, Jongil. “The 21st Century is a Century of Great Change and Creation,” in Rodong Sinmun, Jan. 04, 2001:2.Google Scholar
Kim, Youngsam. Korea's Quest for Reform and Globalization, Selected Speeches, Seoul: Office of the President, 1997.Google Scholar
Klinger, Fred. “The Price of Unity: Economic and Social Consequences of German Unification,” in Pfennig, Werner: United We Stand, Divided We Are, Hamburg: Abera. 1998: 111138.Google Scholar
Kornai, János. The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne O. Trade and Employment in Developing Countries, Volume 3: Synthesis and Conclusions, National Bureau of Economic Research Monograph, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Lardy, Nicholas R. Foreign Trade and Economic Reform in China:1978 - 1990, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Lenin, Wladimir I.Staat und Revolution Teil 2,” in Lenin Werke 25, Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1972: 393507.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. Arthur. “Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour.” The Manchester School 22, 1954: 139191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, List. Das Nationale System der Politischen Ökonomie, Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1922.Google Scholar
Lutz, Matthias G.A General Test of the Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis.” Review of Development Economics, Blackwell Publishing. 3(1), 1999: 4457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahathir, Mohammad and Ishihara, Shintaro. The Voice of Asia - Two Leaders Discuss the Coming Century, Japan: Kodansha International, 1995.Google Scholar
Martin, Bradley K. Under the Loving Care of the Fatherly Leader: North Korea and the Kim Dynasty, Thomas Dunne/St. Martin's, 2004.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei, Berlin: Verlag Junge Welt, 1890/1983.Google Scholar
Masina, Pietro E. (ed.). Rethinking Development in East Asia, Richmond, Surrey: Curzon, 2002.Google Scholar
McCargo, Duncan (ed.). Rethinking Vietnam, London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Dennis L. The Colonial Origins of Korean Enterprise 1910-1945, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montevideo Convention. Encyclopædia Britannica, Retrieved January 29, 2006, from Encyclopædia Britannica Premium Service, http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?tocId=9389459.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. Economic Theory and Under-Developed Regions, London: Duckworth, 1957.Google Scholar
Nurkse, Ragnar. Problems of Capital-Formation in Underdeveloped Countries, 1962 edition, New York: Oxford University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Chunghee. Major Speeches, Seoul: Samhwa Publishing Co., 1974.Google Scholar
Pomeranz, Kenneth. Is There an East Asian Development Path? Long-term Comparisons, Constraints, and Continuities, 2005, available here.Google Scholar
Prebisch, Raúl. The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems, New York: United Nations, 1950.Google Scholar
Richter, Rudolf and Furubotn, Eirik G.. Neue Institutionenökonomik, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999.Google Scholar
Ronnas, Per. “Introduction,” in Ronnas, Per and Ramamurthy, Bhargavi (eds.): Entrepreneurship in Vietnam: Transformation and Dynamics, Copenhagen: NIAS Press, 2001: 128.Google Scholar
Rosenstein-Rodan, Paul. “Notes on the Theory of the Big Push.” In Ellis, H.S. and Wallich, H.C. (eds.), Economic Development in Latin America, New York: Macmillan, 1961.Google Scholar
Rosenstein-Rodan, Paul. “The Theory of the Big Push,” in Meier, Gerald (ed.): Leading Issues in Economic Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976: 632636.Google Scholar
Rostow, Walt. The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Segert, Dieter. Die Grenzen Osteuropas, Frankfurt and New York: Campus, 2002.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. The Wealth of Nations, Book I, Fifth edition, London: Methuen and Co., Ltd., 1904.Google Scholar
Sugihara, Kaoru. The East Asian Path of Economic Development: A Long-Term Perspective, Discussion Paper 00-17 Graduate School of Economics and Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University, 2000.Google Scholar
UNDP. Human Development Report 2004: Cultural Liberty in Today's Diverse World, New York: United Nations Development Program, 2005.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Woo, Jungen. Race to the Swift. State and Finance in Korean Industrialization, New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
World Bank. The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy, World Bank Policy Research Report, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Yechury, Sitaram. “The Road to Socialism in China,” in The Marxist 15(04), Oct.-Dec. 1999.Google Scholar
Yi, Changhui. “Chuch'e Oriented Opinion on the Realm of Circulation of the Meansof Production in Socialist Societies.” Gyeongje Yeongu 1, Feb. 10, 2002:2224.Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed. Culture Is Destiny; A Conversation with Lee Kuan Yew, Foreign Affairs, March/April, 1994.Google Scholar
Zhang, Weiwei. Transforming China: Economic Reform and its Political Implications, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Shulian. “Reform of the Economic Structure,” in Totten, George and Shulian, Zhou (eds.): China's Economic Reform: Administering the Introduction of the Market Mechanism, 1992: 118.Google Scholar