Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:48:21.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grund to Hrof: Aspects of the Old English Semantics of Building and Architecture1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2016

C. P. Biggam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The paper ‘builds’ two Anglo-Saxon virtual buildings, a stone church and a timber house or small hall, using Old English vocabulary. At each phase of the construction, certain of the vocabulary is discussed, drawing on evidence from archaeology and surviving buildings, from etymology, and from contemporary translation from Latin. The aim is to investigate the potential of interdisciplinary studies in the field of Anglo-Saxon architecture and building processes.

On first consideration, it would seem highly productive to combine the forces of archaeological and semantic research to elucidate the subject of Anglo-Saxon buildings. More detailed investigation, however, often leads to disappointment, as Old English lexemes, usually occurring without elaborate explanation, are difficult to link to excavated structural remains which are not, of course, conveniently labelled with Old English technical building terms. Nevertheless, it has been found profitable to link evidence from the two disciplines in certain cases, and the aim of this article is to explore the possibilities for interdisciplinary research in this area.

Type
Research Article
Information
Architectural History , Volume 45 , 2002 , pp. 49 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 © 2000 John Benjamins. Reprinted with permission from Lexicology, Semantics and Lexicography: Selected Papers from the Fourth G. L. Brook Symposium, Manchester, August 1998, ed. Coleman, Julie and Kay, Christian J., Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 194 (Amsterdam, 2000), pp. 103–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar An earlier version of this paper was read to the School of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, at the kind invitation of Prof. Jacek Fisiak.

2 Old English (OE) is used throughout this paper to indicate that phase of English, sometimes called Anglo-Saxon, which dates to before c. A.D.1100. It is followed by Middle English (ME), and Modern English (ModE).

3 Grundy, Lynne and Roberts, Jane, ‘Shapes in the Landscape: Some Words’, in Names, Places and People: an Onomastic Miscellany in Memory of John McNeal Dodgson, ed. Rumble, Alexander R. and Mills, A. D. (Stamford, 1997), pp. 96–110.Google Scholar

4 Roberts, Jane, Christian Kay with Lynne Grundy, A Thesaurus of Old English in Two Volumes, 2 vols (London, 1995) I, pp. 231–41.Google Scholar

5 Taylor, H. M. and Taylor, Joan, Anglo-Saxon Architecture, 3 vols (Cambridge, 1965–78).Google Scholar

6 Old English dictionary definitions in this paper are taken from Clark Hall, J. R., A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary, 4th edn (Cambridge, 1960)Google Scholar, except for those which appear in the published fascicles of the Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto, Dictionary of Old English (Toronto, 1986-) which is currently in process of publication. Where the DOE has been used, this abbreviation will appear after the definition.

7 Line references to Old English poetry throughout this article are taken from Krapp, George Philip and Dobbie, Elliott van Kirk (eds), The Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records: a Collective Edition, 6 vols (New York, 1931–42).Google Scholar

8 Bradley, S. A. J., Anglo-Saxon Poetry: an Anthology of Old English Poems in Prose Translation with Introduction and Headnotes (London, 1982), p. 130.Google Scholar

9 Skeat, Walter W (ed.), The Holy Gospels in Anglo-Saxon, Northumbrian, and Old Mercian Versions Synoptically Arranged, with Collations Exhibiting all the Readings of all the MSS, Together with the Early Latin Version as Contained in the Lindisfarne MS, Collated with the Latin Version in the Rushworth MS (Cambridge, 1871–87), Luke, p. 71.Google Scholar

10 Gregory, I, King Alfred's West Saxon Version of Gregory's ‘Pastoral Care’, ed. Sweet, Henry, 2 vols, Early English Text Society: Original Series 45 and 50 (London, 1871), 11, p. 308.Google Scholar

11 Brotanek, Rudolf (ed.), Texte und Untersuchungen zur altenglischen Literatur und Kirchengeschichte (Halle, 1913), p. 14, lines 8–9.Google Scholar

12 Backhouse, Janet, Turner, D. H. and Webster, Leslie (eds), The Golden Age of Anglo-Saxon Art 966–1066 (London, 1984), pl. XXIX.Google Scholar

13 This argument refers to the wall's appearance from Late Saxon times to the present. It is not suggested that the ‘base-wall’ is of separate build from the upper part, nor is any opinion expressed here on the controversial date and history of this and other features of this church's external walls.

14 Taylor, H. M., ‘Repton Reconsidered: a Study in Structural Criticism’, in England Before the Conquest: Studies in Primary Sources Presented to Dorothy Whitelock, ed. Clemoes, Peter and Hughes, Kathleen (Cambridge, 1971), pp. 351–89 (pp 365–69).Google Scholar

15 Alcock, Leslie, in collaboration with Stevenson, S. J. and Musson, C. R., Cadbury Castle, Somerset: the Early Medieval Archaeology (Cardiff, 1995), p. 46 Google Scholar, illus. 2.1 and 3.1.

16 Taylor and Taylor, III, p. 806.

17 Healey, Antonette diPaolo and Venezky, Richard L., A Microfiche Concordance to Old English (Toronto, 1980).Google Scholar

18 Healey, and Venezky, ; Latham, R. E., Revised Medieval Latin Word-List from British and Irish Sources (London, 1965).Google Scholar

19 Glare, P. G. W., Oxford Latin Dictionary (Oxford, 1982).Google Scholar Where the OLD has been used, this abbreviation will appear.

20 Oliphant, R. T. (ed.), The Harley Latin-Old English Glossary, Janua Linguarum: Series Practica 20 (The Hague, 1966), p. 70, line 794.Google Scholar

21 Taylor and Taylor, III, p. 761.

22 Rodwell, Warwick, ‘Anglo-Saxon Church Building: Aspects of Design and Construction’, in The Anglo-Saxon Church: Papers on History, Architecture, and Archaeology in Honour of Dr H. M. Taylor, ed. Butler, L. A. S. and Morris, R. K., Council for British Archaeology Research Report 60 (London, 1986), pp. 156–75 (p. 157).Google Scholar

23 Addyman, P. V., ‘The Anglo-Saxon House: a New Review’, Anglo-Saxon England, 1 (1972), pp. 273–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 Rahtz, Philip, ‘Buildings and Rural Settlement’, in The Archaeology of Anglo-Saxon England, ed. Wilson, David M. (Cambridge, 1976), pp. 49–98 (p. 82).Google Scholar

25 Greene, Kevin, Archaeology, an Introduction: the History, Principles and Methods of Modern Archaeology, 3rd edn (London, 1995), p. 67, fig. 3.12.Google Scholar

26 Roberts and Kay, II, p. 233.

27 Milne, Gustav and Milne, Chrissie, ‘Catalogue of Waterfront Installations’, in Timber Building Techniques in London c. 900–1400: an Archaeological Study of Waterfront Installations and Related Material, ed. Milne, Gustav, London and Middlesex Archaeological Society Special Paper 15 (London, 1992), pp. 23–77 (P.45)Google Scholar

28 Taylor and Taylor, 11, p. 570.

29 Byrhtferth, , Byrhtferth's Manual (A.D.1011) Now Edited for the First Time from MS. Ashmole 328 in the Bodleian Library, ed. Crawford, S. J., Early English Text Society: Original Series 177 (London, 1929), p. 90 Google Scholar lines 29–31, p. 91, fig. opposite p. 90.

30 Kerr, Mary and Kerr, Nigel, Anglo-Saxon Architecture (Princes Risborough, 1983), p. 38 Google Scholar, fig. 21.

31 Taylor and Taylor, III, pp. 941–43.

32 Taylor and Taylor, II, pp. 940–41.

33 Ælfric, , The Sermones Catholici, or Homilies of Ælfric in the Original Anglo-Saxon with an English Version, ed. Thorpe, Benjamin, 2 vols (London, 1844–46), 1, p. 106.Google Scholar

34 Kerr and Kerr, p. 39.

35 Pocock, Michael and Wheeler, Hazel, ‘Excavations at Escomb Church, County Durham, 1968’, Journal of the British Archaeological Association, 34 (1971), pp. 11–29 Google Scholar (plate IV).

36 Sutherland, Diana S. and Parsons, David, ‘The Petrological Contribution to the Survey of All Saints’ Church Brixworth, Northamptonshire: an Interim Study’, Journal of the British Archaeological Association, 137 (1985 for 1984), pp. 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37 Bosworth, Joseph and Toller, T. Northcote with Alistair Campbell, An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary Based on the Manuscript Collections of the hate Joseph Bosworth, ed. and enlarged by Toller, T. Northcote, with revised and enlarged addenda by Alistair Campbell, 2 vols (Oxford, 1898–1921).Google Scholar

38 Rodwell, Warwick and Rodwell, Kirsty, ‘St Peter's Church, Barton-Upon-Humber: Excavation and Structural Study, 1978–81’, Antiquaries Journal, 62.2 (1982), pp. 283–315 (p. 297).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39 The virtual timber building in this paper is a house or hall. The type of building known variously as a grubenhaus,(grub-)hut, or sunken-featured building, has not been specifically considered, although some of the discussion is also relevant to this type. The grubenhaus has a floor excavated below the ground surface, although, in some cases, this may simply have provided a ventilation space beneath a wooden floor, and its ‘roof’ rests on the ground, or very nearly so, thus obviating the need for vertical walls of any great height except at the two gable ends. Stanley West discusses the evidence for grubenhauser from West Stow in West Stow: the Anglo-Saxon Village, East Anglian Archaeology Report 24, 2 vols (Ipswich, 1985), 1, pp. 113–21Google Scholar, and this is provided in summary form by Martin Welch in English Heritage Book of Anglo-Saxon England (London, 1992), pp. 21–26.Google Scholar

40 Webster, Leslie E. and Cherry, John, ‘Medieval Britain in 1974’, Medieval Archaeology, 19 (1975), pp. 220–60 (pp. 226–27).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41 Hall, Richard, English Heritage Book of Viking Age York (London, 1994), p. 60 and pl. 8.Google Scholar

42 Hall, p. 60, figs 37 and 39, pl. 8.

43 Christie, Håkon, Olsen, Olaf and Taylor, H. M., ‘The Wooden Church of St Andrew at Greensted, Essex’, Antiquaries Journal, 59.1 (1979), pp. 92–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar The surviving stave construction at Greensted may not be pre-Conquest in date, although it is Anglo-Saxon in type. According to recent dendrochronological dating, the timbers were felled in 1063, and the church is estimated to have been built between then and the end of the century (see Tyers, I., ‘Tree-Ring Analysis of Timbers from the Stave Church at Greensted, Essex’, Ancient Monuments Laboratory Reports, 20 (1996), no. 14/96).Google Scholar

44 Mawer, A. and Stenton, F. M., The Place-Names of Buckinghamshire, English Place-Name Society 2 (Cambridge, 1925), p. 194.Google Scholar

45 Beresford, Guy, ‘The Reconstruction of Some Saxon Buildings at Goltho, Lincolnshire’, in Structural Reconstruction: Approaches to the Interpretation of the Excavated Remains of Buildings, ed. Drury, P. J., British Archaeological Reports: British Series 110 (Oxford, 1982), pp. 113–23 (figs 6.2 and 6.3).Google Scholar

46 Millett, Martin with James, Simon, ‘Excavations at Cowdery's Down, Basingstoke, Hampshire, 1978–81’, Archaeological Journal, 140 (1984 for 1983), pp. 151–279 (pp. 228–34,figs 59–63).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47 Hall, pp. 56–57.

48 Healey and Venezky.

49 Hope-Taylor, Brian, Yeavering: an Anglo-British Centre of Early Northumbria, Department of the Environment Archaeological Reports 7 (London, 1977), p. 197, fig. 93.Google Scholar

50 Cramp, Rosemary, ‘Excavations at the Saxon Monastic Sites of Wearmouth and Jarrow, Co. Durham: an Interim Report’, Medieval Archaeology, 13 (1971 for 1969), pp. 21–66 (p. 48).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51 Taylor and Taylor, II, p. 507.

52 Millett, pp. 242–43, figs 57, 64 and 68.

53 Healey and Venezky.

54 Bede, , Venerabilis Baedae historiam ecclesiasticam gentis Anglorum, historiam abbatum, epistolam ad Ecgberctum una cum historia abbatum auctore anonymo, ed. Plummer, Charles (Oxford, 1896), p. 160 Google Scholar (Historia ecclesiastica, book 3, chap. 17).

55 Kerr and Kerr, p. 42, fig. 25.

56 Brown, G. Baldwin, The Arts in Early England: Anglo-Saxon Architecture, 2nd edn (London, 1925),p. 27, figs 9–10.Google Scholar

57 Rodwell, pp. 166–67.

58 Crawford, S. J. (ed.), The Old English Version of the Heptateuch, Ælfric's Treatise on the Old and New Testament, and his Preface to Genesis …, Early English Text Society: Original Series 160 (London, 1922), p. 245. See Exodus 12.22.Google Scholar

59 Addyman, P. V., Leigh, D. and Hughes, M. J., ‘Anglo-Saxon Houses at Chalton, Hampshire’, Medieval Archaeology, 16 (1972), pp. 13–31 (p. 23).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

60 Hope-Taylor, p. 64, fig. 22.

61 Crawford, p. 245. See Exodus 12.22.

62 Taylor and Taylor, III, pp. 836–68.

63 Taylor and Taylor, II, pl. 377.

64 Roberts and Kay, I, p. 236.

65 Brown, p. 141, figs 65A and 65B.

66 Cramp, Rosemary, ‘Window Glass from the Monastic Site of Jarrow’, Journal of Glass Studies, 17 (1975), pp. 88–96.Google Scholar

67 Bede, p. 368 (Historia abbatum, section 5).

68 Hecht, Hans (ed.), Bischofs Wserferth von Worcester Übersetzung der Dialoge Gregors des Grossen über das Leben und die wunderthaten italienischer Väter und über die Unsterblichkeit der Seelen, Bibliothek der angelsächsischen Prosa 5 (Leipzig, 1900), p. 220, lines 15 and 22.Google Scholar

69 Harden, D. B., ‘Domestic Window Glass: Roman, Saxon and Medieval’, in Studies in Building History: Essays in Recognition of the Work of B. H. St. J. O'Neil, ed. Jope, E. M. (London, 1961), pp. 39–63 (pl. V).Google Scholar

70 Kerr and Kerr, pp. 26–28, figs 10–12; Fisher, E. A., Anglo-Saxon Towers: an Architectural and Historical Study (Newton Abbot, 1969).Google Scholar

71 Taylor, H. M., ‘Some Little-Known Aspects of English Pre-ConquestiChurches’, in The Anglo-Saxons: Studies in Some Aspects of their History and Culture Presented to Bruce Dickins, ed. Clemoes, Peter (London, 1959), pp. 137–58 (pp.152–55, pls I–II).Google Scholar

72 Kerr and Kerr, p. 25, fig. 9.

73 Roberts and Kay, I, p. 236.

74 Cherry, Bridget, ‘Ecclesiastical Architecture’, in The Archaeology of Anglo-Saxon England, ed. Wilson, David M. (Cambridge, 1976), pp. 151–200 (pp. 163–69).Google Scholar

75 Taylor and Taylor, I, p. 147, fig. 64.

76 Rahtz, Philip and Watts, Lorna, with the late Taylor, Harold and Butler, Lawrence, St Mary's Church, Deerhurst, Gloucestershire: Fieldwork, Excavations and Structural Analysis 1971–1984, Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London 55 (Woodbridge, 1997), p. 180, fig. 106.Google Scholar

77 Brady, Niall, ‘ De oratorio: Hisperica famina and Church Building’, Peritia, 11 (1997), pp. 327–35 (pp. 330–33)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Herren, Michael W., The Hisperica famina, I: the A-Text: a New Critical Edition with English Translation and Philological Commentary, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies: Studies and Texts 31 (Toronto, 1974), pp. 108–09.Google Scholar

78 Morris, R. (ed.), The Blickling Homilies with a Translation and Index of Words Together with the Blickling Glosses, Early English Text Society: Original Series 58, 63 and 73 (London, 1967), pp. 124–25.Google Scholar

79 Cherry, p. 190, fig. 4.11.

80 Millett, pp. 245–46, figs 70 and 71.

81 Millett, pp. 236–40.

82 Millett, pp. 245–55, figs 70–71.

83 Bede, , On the Temple, trans, with notes by Seán Connolly, with an introduction by Jennifer O'Reilly, Translated Texts for Historians 21 (Liverpool, 1995), p. 34.Google Scholar

84 The illustration of the Temptation of Christ in the Book of Kells shows a gabled Temple (Manuscript: Dublin, Trinity College Library, MS 58, fol. 202v). This may mean that the style of Near Eastern architecture was not universally understood within early medieval insular Christianity, or it may simply denote artistic licence.

85 In spite of speculation, there is no evidence that spires were constructed in Anglo-Saxon England; see Gem, Richard, ‘Staged Timber Spires in Carolingian North-East France and Late Anglo-Saxon England’, Journal of the British Archaeological Association, 148 (1995), pp. 29–54 (p. 50).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

86 I do not understand Brady's equating of ‘pinnacle’ with ‘flagpole’: ‘Browne’s choice of “pinnacles” is equally unsatisfactory, since the thought of a flagpole rising from the roof of any Irish building in this early period is quite unimaginable …’ (p. 333). The Oxford English Dictionary, ed. Simpson, J. A. and Werner, E. S. C., 2nd edn, 20 vols (Oxford, 1989)Google Scholar interprets ‘pinnacle’ as ‘a small ornamental turret’.

87 Keene, Derek, ‘Shingles’, in Object and Economy in Medieval Winchester, ed. Biddle, Martin, Winchester Studies 7.ii, 2 vols (Oxford, 1990), 1, pp. 320–26 (p. 323, fig. 73).Google Scholar

88 Wilson, David, The Bayeux Tapestry: the Complete Tapestry in Colour (London, 1985), pls 3–4.Google Scholar

89 The evidence from manuscript illustrations for shingles and tiles is classified by Carver, M. O. H., ‘Contemporary Artefacts Illustrated in Late Saxon Manuscripts’, Archaeologia, 108 (1986), pp. 117–45 (pp. 121 and 125, fig. 2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

90 Beresford, p. 119.

91 Cramp, fig. 24.4.

92 Backhouse, Turner and Webster, pp. 136–37.

93 Cramp, p. 56, fig. 24.2–3.

94 Bede, p. 181 (Historia ecclesiastica, book 3, chap. 25).

95 James, Simon, Marshall, Anne and Millert, Martin, ‘An Early Medieval Building Tradition’, Archaeological journal, 141 (1985 for 1984), pp. 182–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

96 Dixon, Philip, ‘How Saxon is the Saxon House?’, Structural Reconstruction: Approaches to the Interpretation of the Excavated Remains of Buildings, ed. Drury, P. J., British Archaeological Reports: British Series 110 (Oxford, 1982), pp. 275–87.Google Scholar