Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:49:05.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Chinese Domestic Architectural Heating System [Kang]: Origins, Applications and Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2016

Extract

In northern China, heating is represented by kang. The kang is a living and sleeping platform, a heated bed. It is constructed of brick, adobe or stone and consists of three parts: a fireplace, a kang proper and a chimney. Beneath the flat surface of the kang are flues, which conduct hot air from the fireplace through to the room. The kang allows energy to be conserved; its surface temperature of about 40 degrees C can largely be maintained overnight. It is used as a bed at night; bedding is laid out for sleeping but is put away in the morning. During the day it provides a large warm platform upon which people undertake many household activities. The kang usually occupies from one-third to one-half of the area of a room; but the entire floor of a room can be constructed and heated in this manner, in which case it is called dikang, literally a heated floor (di meaning floor). The heated bed and the heated floor are technically similar, but each developed in conjunction with a distinctive way of life, either sitting on the floor or sitting on furniture.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 These heating practices have persisted over large parts of northern Eurasia. Manchuria was a vast area. Through four Sino-Russia Treaties, made between 1689 and 1860, the north-east part of the territory became Russian domain.

2 In the whole world, there are two highly developed heating systems, the Chinese in the East and the Roman in the West. The former is still in use today, and the latter disappeared long time ago. It is unknown whether there was any connexion between the two systems, since the Silk Road between China and Rome has received only cursory study.

3 Guo, Qinghua, ‘Tile and Brick Making in China: a Study of the Yingzao Fashi’, Construction History, 16 (2000), pp. 311.Google Scholar

4 Pingji refers to a wooden frame used to support the arm when one is sitting on the floor. A related piece of furniture, quji, roughly semicircular in plan, serves as a backrest.

5 Evidence in relief form includes stamped bricks and engraved stones of the Han dynasty [Shandong Hanxiang Shi Xuanji] (Jinan, 1982). Evidence in the form of paintings includes ‘Kanshu Tu’ (by Huang Quan, 903–965), ‘Tangren Gongle Tu (painter unknown, late Fong) and ‘Jinwengong Fuguo Tu (Li Tang, 1085–1165) and also mural paintings (See Temple murals in Shanxi Province[Shanxi Signan Bihua] (Beijing, 1997)).

6 (a) Kyong-cho, Chang, Traditional Korean architecture [Hanguk ui chontong konchuk] (Seoul, 1993), pp. 524–31Google Scholar. (b) Young-taek, Choi, Floor heating system [Gudul Kwang Ondol] (Seoul, 1989), pp. 6063.Google Scholar

7 Ke, Xu, Illustrated Record of Gaoli[Gaoli Tujing], Vol. [juan] 28: Beds, 1123 (reprinted Seoul 1972), p. 156.Google Scholar

8 Dunzhen, Liu, Chinese vernacular architecture [Zhongguo Zhuzhai Gaishuo] (Beijing, 1957), p. 73.Google Scholar

9 Pile dwellings and granaries were introduced to Japan from China together with wet-rice cultivation in the Yayoi period (300 B.C.-A.D. 300).

10 Traditionally, the heated floor has been used in northern Korea, and the timber floor in southern Korea. Following the Japanese invasion (1592–98), large numbers of people fled from the south. After the war, the northern and southern architectural styles converged in the middle of the country. In heating terms, the ondol and the maru were merged in a single building.

11 Shen, Xu, Interpretations of characters and words [Shuowen Jiezi], Vol. 10, A.D. 121 (13th reprinting Beijing, 1994), p. 210.Google Scholar

12 Daoyuan, Li, Commentary on the classic writings on waterways [Shui Jing Zhu], Vol. 14 [Baoqiu Shui], late fifth or early sixth century (reprinted Taipei, 1965), Vol. 2, p. 13.Google Scholar

13 Mengshen, Xu, Collected Records of the Northern Alliance during three reigns [Sanchao Beimeng Huibian], Vol. 3,1196 (reprinted Taipei, 1962), Vol. 1, p. 33 (also reprinted Shanghai, 1987).Google Scholar

14 Maozhao, Yuwen, The History of the Great Jin [Da Jin Guo Zhi], Vol. 39, Song Dynasty (reprinted Taipei, 1968), Vol. 2, p. 463 (also reprinted Beijing, 1986).Google Scholar

15 Xueqin, Cao, Dream of the Red Chamber [Honglou Meng], 1763 (reprinted Beijing, 1982), Chapter (hui) 49, p. 680.Google Scholar

16 Xun, Liu, Old Historical Book of the Tang Dynasty [Jiu Tangshu], Vol. 199 [Gaogouli], A.D. 945 (reprinted Beijing, 1975), Vol. 16, p. 5319 Google Scholar.

17 Xiu, Ou'yang, New Historical Book of the Tang Dynasty [Xin Tangshu], Vol. 220,1061 (reprinted Beijing, 1975), Vol. 20, p. 6186.Google Scholar

18 (a) Veritable records of the Jungjong [Jungjongsilrok], Vol. 29, Choson Dynasty, (b) Lee Dahu, Danlun Ji, Subheading (tiao): Customs, 1653.

19 Yugu, Seo, Home management and economics [Sanlim Gyengjie Ji], Vol. 1 [Construction principles of service buildings and facilities], 1823 (reprinted Seoul, 1983), pp. 380–81.Google Scholar

20 (a) Shenyang Office for Preservation of Antiquities, ‘Excavation of Neolithic Village at Xinle, Shengang’, Journal of Archaeology [Kaogu Xuebao], 2 (1985), pp. 209–22Google Scholar. (b) Shenyang Office for Preservation of Antiquities, ‘Excavation of Neolithic Village at Xinle, Shengang’, Journal of Archaeology, 4 (1978), pp. 449–66.Google Scholar

21 Institute of Archaeology of Academia Sinica, The neolithic village at Banpo, Xi'an (Beijing, 1963), pp. 1617, 27.Google Scholar

22 Jisheng, Miao et al., ‘Preliminary Investigation of Cementing Material Used in Ancient China’, Journal of the Chinese Silicate Society [Guisuanyan Xuebao], 2, (1981), pp. 234–40.Google Scholar

23 Xu, , Analytical dictionary of characters, Vol. 10.Google Scholar

24 Institute of Literature of Academia Sinica (ed.), Selected poems of the Tang Dynasty, 2 (Beijing, 1978), p. 4. Author's translation, as for other translations in the paper.Google Scholar

25 (a) Heilongjiang Antiquities Investigation Team and Archaeological School of Jilin University, ‘Excavation Report on Cultural Antiquities at Tuanjie, Dongning’, in Proceedings of the 1st conference of the Archaeologists Society of Jilin (1979)Google Scholar. (b) Taixiang, Zhang, ‘Architectural Remains at Tuanjie, Dongning’, Guangming Daily [Guangming Ribao], 23 July 1978.Google Scholar

26 Exhibition of Recent Archaeological Excavations in Heilongjiang, Provincial Museum, Harbin, 2000.

27 Museum, Jilin, ‘Architectural Remains of the Gaogoli period renovated at Ji'an, Jilin’, Archaeology [Kaoku], 1 (1961), pp. 5055.Google Scholar

28 The Japanese archaeologists and historians were curious to know about ancient Chinese architecture and its heating systems, and carried out several excavations in Manchuria during the period of Japanese Wartime Empire (1895–1945). Japan occupied Manchuria in 1931, and colonized Korea in 1895. (a) Tung-ching-cheng: Report on the excavation of the site of the capital of Bohai[Tonkinjo: Bokkaikoku jokei ryosenfu ato no hakkutsu chosa] (Tokyo, 1939)Google Scholar. (b) Jiro, Murata, ‘The Origins of the Ondol and the Kang (Part I)’, Architectural Studies [Kenchikugaku kenkyu], 9 (1929), pp. 116 Google Scholar; (Part II) [Kenchikugaku kenkyu], 10 (1929), pp. 1–16.

29 Cuncheng, Wei, ‘Bohai Architecture’, Heilongjiang antiquities [Heilongjiang Wenwu Congkan], 4 (1984), pp. 3643, 72.Google Scholar

30 (a) Kyong-cho, Chang, ‘A Study of the formation and development of Korean heating System’, Art and Archaeology [Kogo Misul], 12 (1984), pp. 925 Google Scholar. (b) Dianfu, Li, Archaeological research in northeast China [Dongbei Kaogu Yanjiu], 2 (Zhenzhou, 1994), p. 134.Google Scholar

31 (a) Institute of Archaeology, Shaanxi Province, Excavation of Tang Kiln-sites at Huangpu in Tongchuan, Shaanxi [Tangdai Huangpu Yaozhi], 2 vols (Beijing, 1992), p. 12.Google Scholar (b) Institute of Archaeology, Shaanxi Province and Yaozhou Kiln Museum, The Yaozhou kiln site of the Song Period [Songdai Yaozhou Yaozhi] (Beijing, 1998), pp. 2931.Google Scholar

32 Guo, Qinghua, ‘The Formation and Early Development of Architecture in Northern China’, Construction History, 18 (2002), pp. 115.Google Scholar

33 (a) Qianying, Hu, Hu Qianying selected works on archaeological research of Zhou culture (Chengdu, 2000), pp. 299324 Google Scholar. (b) Xingpeng, Liang and Miao, Li, ‘Reconstruction of Building Remains at Wugong, Shaanxi Province’, Archaeology [Kaogu], 3 (1991), pp. 245–51.Google Scholar

34 Xianyang Archaeological Division, ‘Brief excavation report on Number One Palace remains in the Qin capital Xianyang’, Antiquities [Wenwu], 11 (1976), pp. 1224.Google Scholar

35 History of the Han Dynasty[Han Shu], and the Illustration of the Imperial District[Sanfu Huangtu] (c. third century). References are to Zongxiang, Zhou, An edited and annotated version of the Illustration of the Imperial District [Jiaozheng Sanfu Huangtu] (Beijing, 1958).Google Scholar

36 Guo, Qinghua, ‘Shenyang: the Manchurian Ideal Capital City and Imperial Palace, 1625–43’, Urban History, 27, 3 (2000), pp. 344–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37 Yuguang, Fu and Huiying, Meng, Manchurian Shamanism [Manzu Samanjiao Yanjiu] (Beijing, 1991).Google Scholar

38 (1) Lijuan, Bai, ‘Techniques of Floor-heating Systems’, Traditional Chinese architecture and gardens [Gujian Yuanlin Jishu], 4 (1996), pp. 1415 Google Scholar. (2) Yuhuan, Zhang (ed.), History and development of ancient Chinese architectural techniques [Zhongguo Gidai Jianzhu Kishu Shi] (Beijing, 1986), p. 326.Google Scholar

39 The circular brick was made from a square one by cutting off its corners diagonally.

40 Gudul is an old word, lacking any written form in Chinese characters.

41 When the Qing ruler moved the government to Beijing in 1644, Shenyang retained a special status as an auxiliary capital, and its palace received eleven visits from the emperors.